World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David E.J. Armstrong

David E.J. Armstrong

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 43 12303 11897 503 484 149 7341

David E.J. Armstrong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David E.J. Armstrong between 1959 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David E.J. Armstrong published across 68 years, from 1959 to 2026, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2020. 9 of the 185 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2020. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1959 2026

185 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David E.J. Armstrong: publications per year, 1959 to 2026
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 1
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 2
2009 4
2010 0
2011 2
2012 5
2013 15
2014 4
2015 13
2016 11
2017 14
2018 8
2019 14
2020 20
2021 12
2022 13
2023 16
2024 13
2025 8
2026 1
Total 185
Download as CSV

David E.J. Armstrong publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E.J. Armstrong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 50–69 to 1,163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 891. Most scientists, 891, have 190–209 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 130–149 publications, is where this scientist sits. 50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50–69 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 149 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
50–69 28
70–89 152
90–109 356
110–129 487
130–149 723 149
150–169 835
170–189 850
190–209 891
210–229 862
230–249 766
250–269 726
270–289 665
290–309 593
310–329 537
330–349 477
350–369 440
370–389 356
390–409 321
410–429 256
430–449 246
450–469 216
470–489 212
490–509 174
510–529 194
530–549 162
550–569 131
570–589 111
590–609 103
610–629 99
630–649 77
650–669 92
670–689 56
690–709 53
710–729 53
730–749 38
750–769 52
770–789 43
790–809 38
810–829 34
830–849 25
850–869 18
870–889 20
890–909 24
910–929 27
930–949 20
950–969 17
970–989 10
990–1,009 16
1,010–1,029 13
1,030–1,049 12
1,050–1,069 9
1,070–1,089 8
1,090–1,109 7
1,110–1,129 9
1,130–1,149 2
1,150–1,162 5
1,163+ 100
Download as CSV

David E.J. Armstrong D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E.J. Armstrong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 165+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 667. Most scientists, 667, have 52–53 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 211
42–43 450 43
44–45 612
46–47 612
48–49 598
50–51 657
52–53 667
54–55 621
56–57 597
58–59 610
60–61 587
62–63 606
64–65 533
66–67 490
68–69 469
70–71 378
72–73 421
74–75 359
76–77 323
78–79 299
80–81 230
82–83 210
84–85 195
86–87 203
88–89 175
90–91 175
92–93 142
94–95 121
96–97 117
98–99 107
100–101 88
102–103 85
104–105 68
106–107 62
108–109 57
110–111 45
112–113 49
114–115 50
116–117 34
118–119 38
120–121 37
122–123 29
124–125 28
126–127 24
128–129 33
130–131 28
132–133 21
134–135 20
136–137 23
138–139 17
140–141 12
142–143 17
144–145 21
146–147 13
148–149 11
150–151 14
152–153 13
154–155 9
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 4
162–163 4
164 3
165+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David E.J. Armstrong is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans key areas within engineering and materials science, with a concentration on materials chemistry, mechanical engineering, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The scholar has contributed extensively to topics such as fusion materials and technologies, metal and thin film mechanics, advanced ceramic materials synthesis, advanced materials characterization techniques, nuclear materials and properties, high-temperature coating behaviors, and advanced materials and composites.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Dendrite initiation and propagation in lithium metal solid-state batteries" (2023, Nature)
  • "Amorphization in extreme deformation of the CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy" (2021, Science Advances)
  • "High-Entropy Alloys for Advanced Nuclear Applications" (2021, Entropy)
  • "The effects of irradiation on CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy and its derivatives" (2021, Progress in Materials Science)
  • "2020 roadmap on solid-state batteries" (2020, Journal of Physics Energy)

Their work has appeared frequently in several publication venues, including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
  • Materialia
  • Materials & Design

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David E.J. Armstrong are:

  • Michael P. Moody
  • Junliang Liu
  • Kay Song
  • Paul A.J. Bagot
  • Patrick S. Grant

Their academic contributions highlight an integration of advanced material sciences with engineering disciplines, focusing heavily on the behavior and characterization of materials under various conditions. This includes work on high-entropy alloys, solid-state batteries, and nuclear materials, indicating a multidisciplinary approach.

Throughout their career, the scientist has shown a consistent engagement with both theoretical and applied research within the materials science and engineering fields, reflected in their publication record and active collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Recent progress in research on tungsten materials for nuclear fusion applications in Europe

    M. Rieth;S. L. Dudarev;S. M. Gonzalez De Vicente;J. Aktaa

  • Dendrite initiation and propagation in lithium metal solid-state batteries

    Unknown

  • Hybrid electrolytes with 3D bicontinuous ordered ceramic and polymer microchannels for all-solid-state batteries

    Stefanie Zekoll;Cassian Marriner-Edwards;A. K. Ola Hekselman;Jitti Kasemchainan

  • Amorphization in extreme deformation of the CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy

    Shiteng Zhao;Zezhou Li;Chaoyi Zhu;Wen Yang

  • High-Entropy Alloys for Advanced Nuclear Applications

    Ed J. Pickering;Alexander W. Carruthers;Paul J. Barron;Simon C. Middleburgh

  • High temperature nanoindentation: The state of the art and future challenges

    J.M. Wheeler;D.E.J. Armstrong;W. Heinz;R. Schwaiger

  • Environmentally-assisted grain boundary attack as a mechanism of embrittlement in a nickel-based superalloy

    A.A.N. Németh;D.J. Crudden;D.E.J. Armstrong;D.M. Collins

  • Lattice swelling and modulus change in a helium-implanted tungsten alloy: X-ray micro-diffraction, surface acoustic wave measurements, and multiscale modelling

    F. Hofmann;D. Nguyen-Manh;M.R. Gilbert;C.E. Beck

  • Solid-state lithium battery cathodes operating at low pressures

    Unknown

  • Short communication: ‘Low activation, refractory, high entropy alloys for nuclear applications’

    A. Kareer;J.C. Waite;B. Li;A. Couet

  • Measuring anisotropy in Young's modulus of copper using microcantilever testing

    David E. J. Armstrong;Angus J. Wilkinson;Steve G. Roberts

  • Hardening of self ion implanted tungsten and tungsten 5-wt% rhenium

    D.E.J. Armstrong;X. Yi;E.A. Marquis;E.A. Marquis;S.G. Roberts

  • How oxidized grain boundaries fail

    Helen Dugdale;David E.J. Armstrong;Edmund Tarleton;Steve G. Roberts

  • Ion-irradiation-induced clustering in W–Re and W–Re–Os alloys: A comparative study using atom probe tomography and nanoindentation measurements

    Alan Xu;Christian Beck;David E.J. Armstrong;Krishna Rajan

  • The effects of irradiation on CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy and its derivatives

    Zhouran Zhang;David E.J. Armstrong;Patrick S. Grant

  • Ion-irradiation induced clustering in W-Re-Ta, W-Re and W-Ta alloys: An atom probe tomography and nanoindentation study

    Alan Xu;Alan Xu;David E.J. Armstrong;Christian Beck;Michael P. Moody

  • 2020 roadmap on solid-state batteries

    Mauro Pasta;David Armstrong;Zachary L. Brown;Junfu Bu

  • Sodium/Na β″ Alumina Interface: Effect of Pressure on Voids.

    Dominic Spencer Jolly;Ziyang Ning;James E. Darnbrough;Jitti Kasemchainan

  • Effects of sequential tungsten and helium ion implantation on nano-indentation hardness of tungsten

    D. E. J. Armstrong;P. D. Edmondson;S. G. Roberts

  • Small-scale characterisation of irradiated nuclear materials: Part II nanoindentation and micro-cantilever testing of ion irradiated nuclear materials

    D.E.J. Armstrong;C.D. Hardie;C.D. Hardie;J.S.K.L. Gibson;A.J. Bushby

  • Micro-mechanical measurements of fracture toughness of bismuth embrittled copper grain boundaries

    D.E.J. Armstrong;A.J. Wilkinson;S.G. Roberts

  • A nanoindentation investigation of local strain rate sensitivity in dual-phase Ti alloys

    Tea-Sung Jun;David E.J. Armstrong;T. Benjamin Britton

Frequent Co-Authors

Angus J. Wilkinson
Angus J. Wilkinson University of Oxford
Michael P. Moody
Michael P. Moody University of Oxford
Peter Hosemann
Peter Hosemann University of California, Berkeley
Thomas James Marrow
Thomas James Marrow University of Oxford
Sergei L. Dudarev
Sergei L. Dudarev Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
Gerald Pintsuk
Gerald Pintsuk Forschungszentrum Jülich
Sergio Lozano-Perez
Sergio Lozano-Perez University of Oxford
Ch. Linsmeier
Ch. Linsmeier Forschungszentrum Jülich
Peter G. Bruce
Peter G. Bruce University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David E.J. Armstrong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles