World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
10320
World Ranking
16146
National Ranking
6689

Janet A. Fairley publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet A. Fairley sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 131 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Janet A. Fairley D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet A. Fairley sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janet A. Fairley is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work spans several subfields, including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Rheumatology, Dermatology, and Immunology.

The scientist's primary topics of study cover a range of conditions and mechanisms related to skin diseases and immunological disorders. These include:

  • Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
  • Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
  • Urticaria and Related Conditions
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases

Janet A. Fairley has contributed to multiple publications during recent years. Some of the notable papers include:

  • Expert recommendations for the management of autoimmune bullous diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020), Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • Updated international expert recommendations for the management of autoimmune bullous diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • Evaluation of a Case Series of Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis in the United States (2021), JAMA Dermatology
  • Mixed Individual-Aggregate Data on All-Cause Mortality in Bullous Pemphigoid (2021), JAMA Dermatology
  • TSST-1+ Staphylococcus aureus in Bullous Pemphigoid (2021), Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Their frequent coauthors comprise scholars contributing collaboratively within similar research areas. These include Kelly N. Messingham, P. Joly, Enno Schmidt, Aimee Payne, and Detlef Zillikens.

Fairley's publications have appeared predominantly in a range of peer-reviewed journals, with repeated contributions to:

  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • JAMA Dermatology
  • UNC Libraries
  • JID Innovations

Best Publications

  • The detection of monkeypox in humans in the Western Hemisphere.

    Kurt D. Reed;John W. Melski;Mary Beth Graham;Russell L. Regnery

  • A passive transfer model of the organ-specific autoimmune disease, bullous pemphigoid, using antibodies generated against the hemidesmosomal antigen, BP180.

    Zhi Liu;Luis A. Diaz;James L. Troy;James L. Troy;Ann F. Taylor

  • Epitope spreading : Lessons from autoimmune skin diseases

    Lawrence S. Chan;Carol J. Vanderlugt;Takashi Hashimoto;Takeji Nishikawa

  • Calcifying disorders of the skin

    John S Walsh;John S Walsh;Janet A Fairley;Janet A Fairley

  • Definitions and outcome measures for bullous pemphigoid: Recommendations by an international panel of experts

    Dedee F. Murrell;Benjamin S. Daniel;Pascal Joly;Luca Borradori

  • The role of complement in experimental bullous pemphigoid.

    Zhi Liu;George J. Giudice;Susan J. Swartz;Janet A. Fairley;Janet A. Fairley

  • Mucosal and Mucocutaneous (Generalized) Pemphigus Vulgaris Show Distinct Autoantibody Profiles

    Xiang Ding;Xiang Ding;Valeria Aoki;Valeria Aoki;Jose M. Mascaro;Jose M. Mascaro;Angelia Lopez-Swiderski;Angelia Lopez-Swiderski

  • A major role for neutrophils in experimental bullous pemphigoid

    Zhi Liu;George J. Giudice;Xiaoye Zhou;Susan J. Swartz

  • Multistate outbreak of Monkeypox: Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin, 2003

    J. Melski;K. Reed;E. Stratman;M. B. Graham

  • A pathogenic role for IgE in autoimmunity: bullous pemphigoid IgE reproduces the early phase of lesion development in human skin grafted to nu/nu mice.

    Janet A. Fairley;Christopher T. Burnett;Chang-Ling Fu;David L. Larson

  • A critical role for neutrophil elastase in experimental bullous pemphigoid

    Zhi Liu;Steven D. Shapiro;Xiaoye Zhou;Sally S. Twining

  • Development and characterization of desmoglein-3 specific T cells from patients with pemphigus vulgaris

    Mong Shang Lin;Sue J. Swartz;Argelia Lopez;Xiang Ding

  • Omalizumab therapy for bullous pemphigoid.

    Kenneth K. Yu;Ashley B. Crew;Kelly A.N. Messingham;Janet A. Fairley;Janet A. Fairley

  • Pathogenicity of IgE in autoimmunity: Successful treatment of bullous pemphigoid with omalizumab

    Janet A. Fairley;Janet A. Fairley;Christian L. Baum;Debra S. Brandt;Kelly A.N. Messingham

  • Normal and gene-corrected dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa fibroblasts alone can produce type VII collagen at the basement membrane zone.

    David T. Woodley;Gerald G. Krueger;Cynthia M. Jorgensen;Janet A. Fairley

  • Identification of a potential effector function for IgE autoantibodies in the organ-specific autoimmune disease bullous pemphigoid

    Otobia G. Dimson;George J. Giudice;Chang Ling Fu;Francoise Van den Bergh

  • Definitions and outcome measures for mucous membrane pemphigoid: recommendations of an international panel of experts

    Dedee F. Murrell;Branka Marinovic;Frederic Caux;Catherine Prost

  • Subepidermal blistering induced by human autoantibodies to BP180 requires innate immune players in a humanized bullous pemphigoid mouse model.

    Zhi Liu;Wen Sui;Minglang Zhao;Zhuowei Li

  • The anti-desmoglein 1 autoantibodies in pemphigus vulgaris sera are pathogenic

    Xiang Ding;Luis A. Diaz;Luis A. Diaz;Janet A. Fairley;Janet A. Fairley;George J. Giudice

  • Pemphigus foliaceus and pemphigus vulgaris autoantibodies react with the extracellular domain of desmoglein-1

    Daryl J. Emery;Luis K. Diaz;Luis K. Diaz;Janet A. Fairley;Janet A. Fairley;Argelia Lopez

Frequent Co-Authors

Luis A. Diaz
Luis A. Diaz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
George J. Giudice
George J. Giudice University of Iowa
Zhi Liu
Zhi Liu University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
David T. Woodley
David T. Woodley University of Southern California
Detlef Zillikens
Detlef Zillikens University of Lübeck
Mei Chen
Mei Chen University of Southern California
Victoria P. Werth
Victoria P. Werth University of Pennsylvania
Pascal Joly
Pascal Joly University of Rouen
Masayuki Amagai
Masayuki Amagai Keio University
Nandakumar S. Narayanan
Nandakumar S. Narayanan University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to diverse roles in research, healthcare, and industry. Many students now look to flexible online programs to gain advanced expertise or broaden their options. For those interested in the intersection of life sciences and nutrition, an online degree in nutrition can prepare you for critical roles in wellness, food safety, or health education.

If your interests lean toward healthcare management, consider cahme accreditation mha programs for essential leadership and administrative skills. Aspiring nurse practitioners can benefit from flexible best online dnp programs that often do not require in-person clinicals.

Those looking to reach executive roles in healthcare should also explore doctoral programs for healthcare administration. Whichever path you choose, online programs offer adaptability and allow you to tailor your studies for career advancement in the biosciences and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Janet A. Fairley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles