World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
33512
World Ranking
14441
National Ranking
7305

Victoria P. Werth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victoria P. Werth sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 670 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Victoria P. Werth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victoria P. Werth sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Victoria P. Werth is a researcher affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States, specializing in medicine with a strong focus on rheumatology and dermatology. Their research spans multiple subfields, including immunology, epidemiology, pathology and forensic medicine, and dermatology. The scientist has contributed extensively to systemic lupus erythematosus research, inflammatory myopathies and dermatomyositis, autoimmune bullous skin diseases, eosinophilic disorders and syndromes, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, T-cell and B-cell immunology, as well as urticaria and related conditions.

Their publication record includes numerous articles in prominent journals with a focus on dermatological and rheumatological conditions. Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • British Journal of Dermatology
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Lupus Science & Medicine

Werth's recent papers highlight involvement in key clinical and translational research studies. Important publications include:

  • "2021 DORIS definition of remission in SLE: final recommendations from an international task force," 2021, Lupus Science & Medicine
  • "Deucravacitinib, a Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibitor, in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial," 2022, Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • "Unmet Medical Needs in Chronic, Non-communicable Inflammatory Skin Diseases," 2022, Frontiers in Medicine
  • "A systematic review and meta-analysis to inform cancer screening guidelines in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies," 2021, Lara D. Veeken
  • "Trial of Anti-BDCA2 Antibody Litifilimab for Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus," 2022, New England Journal of Medicine

The scientist collaborates regularly with a network of coauthors, indicating an extensive collaborative research environment. Frequent coauthors include Rui Feng, Thomas Vazquez, DeAnna Diaz, Josef Symon S. Concha, and Madison Grinnell.

Best Publications

  • Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Michelle Petri;Ana Maria Orbai;Graciela S. Alarcõn;Caroline Gordon

  • 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups

    Ingrid E Lundberg;Anna Tjärnlund;Matteo Bottai;Victoria P Werth

  • 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Their Major Subgroups.

    Ingrid E Lundberg;Anna Tjärnlund;Matteo Bottai;Victoria P Werth

  • Anifrolumab, an Anti–Interferon-α Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, in Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    Richard Furie;Munther Khamashta;Joan T. Merrill;Victoria P. Werth

  • Consensus statement on definitions of disease, end points, and therapeutic response for pemphigus

    Dedee F. Murrell;Sarah Dick;A. R. Ahmed;Masayuki Amagai

  • The CLASI (Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index): An Outcome Instrument for Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

    Joerg Albrecht;Lynne Taylor;Jesse A. Berlin;Samuel Dulay

  • Sifalimumab, an anti-interferon-α monoclonal antibody, in moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    Munther Khamashta;Joan T Merrill;Victoria P Werth;Victoria P Werth;Richard Furie

  • European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for monitoring patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in clinical practice and in observational studies

    Marta Mosca;C. Tani;M. Aringer;S. Bombardieri

  • Update on morphea: Part I. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and pathogenesis

    Nicole Fett;Victoria P. Werth

  • Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis.

    Lisa G. Rider;Victoria P. Werth;Adam M. Huber;Helene Alexanderson

  • Definitions and outcome measures for bullous pemphigoid: Recommendations by an international panel of experts

    Dedee F. Murrell;Benjamin S. Daniel;Pascal Joly;Luca Borradori

  • A framework for remission in SLE: consensus findings from a large international task force on definitions of remission in SLE (DORIS)

    Ronald van Vollenhoven;Alexandre Voskuyl;George Bertsias;Cynthia Aranow

  • Diagnosis and management of pemphigus: Recommendations of an international panel of experts

    Dedee F. Murrell;Sandra Peña;Sandra Peña;Pascal Joly;Branka Marinovic

  • Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, an IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor, in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a multicentre, double-blind, phase 2, randomised, controlled study

    Ronald F van Vollenhoven;Ronald F van Vollenhoven;Bevra H Hahn;George C Tsokos;Carrie L Wagner

  • International consensus outcome measures for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Development and initial validation of myositis activity and damage indices in patients with adult onset disease.

    D. A. Isenberg;E. Allen;V. Farewell;M. R. Ehrenstein

  • Classification of myositis

    Ingrid E. Lundberg;Ingrid E. Lundberg;Marianne de Visser;Victoria P. Werth

  • Prevention and treatment of systemic glucocorticoid side effects

    Siamak Moghadam-Kia;Victoria P. Werth

  • Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and treatment.

    Lauren G. Okon;Victoria P. Werth

  • Nomenclature of Cutaneous Vasculitis: Dermatologic Addendum to the 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides.

    Cord H. Sunderkötter;Bernhard Zelger;Ko Ron Chen;Luis Requena

  • Reliability and convergent validity of two outcome instruments for pemphigus.

    Misha Rosenbach;Dedee F. Murrell;Jean Claude Bystryn;Sam Dulay

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa G. Rider
Lisa G. Rider National Institutes of Health
Frederick W. Miller
Frederick W. Miller National Institutes of Health
Joan T. Merrill
Joan T. Merrill Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Ingrid E. Lundberg
Ingrid E. Lundberg Karolinska University Hospital
Pascal Joly
Pascal Joly University of Rouen
Kenneth C. Kalunian
Kenneth C. Kalunian University of California, San Diego
Munther A. Khamashta
Munther A. Khamashta King's College London
Kevin Jon Williams
Kevin Jon Williams Temple University
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven University of Amsterdam
Ian N. Bruce
Ian N. Bruce University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. For those interested in patient care but seeking a shorter or more flexible route, becoming a nurse is a popular option. You can even find a nursing school that doesn't require teas, which may reduce entry barriers and help you get started more quickly.

For students interested in the business and management side of healthcare, earning a health care administration degree online is an efficient way to prepare for leadership roles. If you’re already a registered nurse, you might want to advance your career by considering adn to np bridge programs. These bridge programs allow you to move toward a nurse practitioner role while continuing to work.

Alternatively, those passionate about food science and community wellness can enroll in online degrees in nutrition. Whichever path you choose, online programs offer flexibility, making it easier to fit your studies into your busy schedule and reach your career goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Victoria P. Werth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles