World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
22350
World Ranking
15736
National Ranking
7918

Neuroscience

D-Index
83
Citations
22361
World Ranking
1468
National Ranking
733

Michael J. Aminoff publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Aminoff sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 487 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael J. Aminoff D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Aminoff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Aminoff is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on medicine and arts and humanities. Within these broad areas, their work is concentrated in neurology, history, clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and physiology.

The scientist's research topics encompass:

  • History of Medical Practice
  • Medical History and Innovations
  • Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
  • History of Medicine Studies
  • Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Michael J. Aminoff has contributed to various types of scholarly publications. They have been involved in the publication of books, including one titled Victor Horsley published by Cambridge University Press in 2022. Their recent papers include:

  • "Fostering Inclusivity in Research Engagement for Underrepresented Populations in Parkinson's Disease: The FIRE-UP PD study," 2024, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • "Foreword," 2022, Handbook of clinical neurology
  • "Index," 2022, Cambridge University Press eBooks
  • "Foreword," 2020, Handbook of clinical neurology
  • "Foreword," 2020, Handbook of clinical neurology

Their publications frequently appear in the following venues:

  • Handbook of clinical neurology
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Collaboration is evident in their coauthorship with several researchers, including:

  • François Boller
  • Dick F. Swaab
  • Juliana M. Ison
  • Jonathan Jackson
  • Helen Hemley

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials

    G. Cruccu;M.J. Aminoff;G. Curio;J.M. Guerit

  • A controlled trial of rasagiline in early Parkinson disease: The tempo study

    Andrew Siderowf;Matthew Stern;Ira Shoulson;Karl Kieburtz

  • Status epilepticus: Causes, clinical features and consequences in 98 patients

    Michael J. Aminoff;Roger P. Simon

  • Safety and tolerability of putaminal AADC gene therapy for Parkinson disease

    C. W. Christine;P. A. Starr;P. S. Larson;J. L. Eberling

  • Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology

    Michael J. Aminoff

  • THE PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH SPINAL VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS

    M. J. Aminoff;Valentine Logue

  • The pathophysiology of spinal vascular malformations

    M.J. Aminoff;R.O. Barnard;Valentine Logue

  • Results from a phase I safety trial of hAADC gene therapy for Parkinson disease

    J. L. Eberling;W. J. Jagust;C. W. Christine;P. Starr

  • Clinical features of spinal vascular malformations.

    M. J. Aminoff;Valentine Logue

  • Long-term evaluation of a phase 1 study of AADC gene therapy for Parkinson's disease.

    Gabriele Mittermeyer;Chadwick W. Christine;Kathryn H. Rosenbluth;Suzanne L. Baker

  • Melatonin for sleep disturbances in Parkinson's disease.

    Glenna A. Dowling;Judith Mastick;Eric Colling;Julie H. Carter

  • AAEM Minimonograph 32: The electrodiagnostic examination in patients with radiculopathies

    Asa J. Wilbourn;Michael J. Aminoff

  • A randomized clinical trial of coenzyme Q10 and GPI-1485 in early Parkinson disease

    Karl Kieburtz;Bernard Ravina;Bernard Ravina;Wendy R. Galpern;Barbara Tilley

  • Electrophysiological differences between subtypes of dementia.

    Douglas S. Goodin;Michael J. Aminoff

  • VASCULAR ANOMALIES IN THE INTRACRANIAL DURA MATER

    M. J. Aminoff

  • Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.

    Steven A. Lukes;Lawrence E. Crooks;Michael J. Aminoff;Leon Kaufman

  • Heterozygosity for a mutation in the parkin gene leads to later onset Parkinson disease

    Tatiana Foroud;S. K. Uniacke;L. Liu;Nathan D Pankratz

  • IFCN recommended standards for short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Report of an IFCN committee

    Marc R. Nuwer;Michael Aminoff;John Desmedt;Andrew A. Eisen

  • Magnetoencephalography in partial epilepsy : Clinical yield and localization accuracy

    R. C. Knowlton;K. D. Laxer;M. J. Aminoff;T. P.L. Roberts

  • Principles of Neural Science. 4th edition

    Michael J. Aminoff

  • Handbook of clinical neurology

    Pierre J. Vinken;George W. Bruyn;Michael J. Aminoff;François Boller

  • Evoked potentials in clinical medicine.

    Michael J. Aminoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas S. Goodin
Douglas S. Goodin University of California, San Francisco
Dick F. Swaab
Dick F. Swaab Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
Robert A. Hauser
Robert A. Hauser University of South Florida
Anthony E. Lang
Anthony E. Lang University of Toronto
David Simon
David Simon Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Rajesh Pahwa
Rajesh Pahwa University of Kansas
Christopher Kennard
Christopher Kennard University of Oxford
Timothy A. Pedley
Timothy A. Pedley Columbia University
Ivan Bodis-Wollner
Ivan Bodis-Wollner SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Richard T. Johnson
Richard T. Johnson Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online neuroscience degrees offers great flexibility and multiple pathways to a rewarding career. Many students choose accelerated programs to complete their studies faster, saving both time and tuition costs. These intensive tracks are ideal for ambitious learners ready to jumpstart their careers.

When considering future earning potential, it’s smart to look at the best bachelor’s degrees and easiest college majors with high pay. Neuroscience is often associated with roles in healthcare, research, and technology, many of which consistently rank among high-paying, in-demand options.

For those worried about tuition, there are many accessible cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa in usa. These schools broaden access to quality education, making your neuroscience degree and future career opportunities more attainable.

Ultimately, choosing the right online program can set you on a clear path toward both personal fulfillment and professional success in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Aminoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles