World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6101
World Ranking
9364
National Ranking
3972

Andy Podgurski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andy Podgurski sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 98 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andy Podgurski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andy Podgurski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andy Podgurski is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Software, Signal Processing, and Information Systems.

The core topics of Podgurski's research focus on several areas related to software and data analysis. These topics include:

  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques

Podgurski has contributed scholarly articles that address challenges in medical robotics and fault localization in software systems. Recent publications include:

  • Detection and Prediction of Adverse and Anomalous Events in Medical Robots, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Improving Fault Localization by Integrating Value and Predicate Based Causal Inference Techniques, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their research has been published in venues such as the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and arXiv, reflecting engagement with leading conferences and preprint servers in the computing field.

Among frequent collaborators are researchers including Kai Liang, Feng Cao, Zhuofu Bai, Mark Renfrew, and M. Çavuşoğu. These coauthors have contributed to shared research endeavors primarily in software reliability, debugging, and artificial intelligence applications.

Best Publications

  • A formal model of program dependences and its implications for software testing, debugging, and maintenance

    A. Podgurski;L.A. Clarke

  • Automated support for classifying software failure reports

    Andy Podgurski;David Leon;Patrick Francis;Wes Masri

  • A formal evaluation of data flow path selection criteria

    L.A. Clarke;A. Podgurski;D.J. Richardson;S.J. Zeil

  • A comparison of coverage-based and distribution-based techniques for filtering and prioritizing test cases

    D. Leon;A. Podgurski

  • The Probabilistic Program Dependence Graph and Its Application to Fault Diagnosis

    G K Baah;A Podgurski;M J Harrold

  • jRapture: A Capture/Replay tool for observation-based testing

    John Steven;Pravir Chandra;Bob Fleck;Andy Podgurski

  • Retrieving reusable software by sampling behavior

    Andy Podgurski;Lynn Pierce

  • Causal inference for statistical fault localization

    George K. Baah;Andy Podgurski;Mary Jean Harrold

  • Dex: a semantic-graph differencing tool for studying changes in large code bases

    S. Raghavan;R. Rohana;D. Leon;A. Podgurski

  • Pursuing failure: the distribution of program failures in a profile space

    William Dickinson;David Leon;Andy Podgurski

  • Big bad data: law, public health, and biomedical databases.

    Sharona Hoffman;Andy Podgurski

  • E-Health Hazards: Provider Liability and Electronic Health Record Systems

    Sharona Hoffman;Andy Podgurski

  • In Sickness, Health, and Cyberspace: Protecting the Security of Electronic Private Health Information

    Sharona Hoffman;Andy Podgurski

  • A comparison of data flow path selection criteria

    Lori A. Clarke;Andy Podgurski;Debra J. Richardson;Steven J. Zeil

  • Tree-based methods for classifying software failures

    P. Francis;D. Leon;M. Minch;A. Podgurski

  • Estimation of software reliability by stratified sampling

    Andy Podgurski;Wassim Masri;Yolanda McCleese;Francis G. Wolff

  • Detecting and debugging insecure information flows

    W. Masri;A. Podgurski;D. Leon

  • An Empirical Study of Test Case Filtering Techniques Based on Exercising Information Flows

    W. Masri;A. Podgurski;D. Leon

  • The use and misuse of biomedical data: is bigger really better?

    Sharona Hoffman;Andy Podgurski

  • An agile manufacturing workcell design

    Roger D. Quinn;Greg C. Causey;Frank L. Merat;David M. Sargent

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Leon
David A. Leon London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Lori A. Clarke
Lori A. Clarke University of Massachusetts Amherst
Mary Jean Harrold
Mary Jean Harrold Georgia Institute of Technology
Roger D. Quinn
Roger D. Quinn Case Western Reserve University
Leon Sterling
Leon Sterling Swinburne University of Technology
Charles Yang
Charles Yang University of Pennsylvania
Eleni Stroulia
Eleni Stroulia University of Alberta
Elaine J. Weyuker
Elaine J. Weyuker University of Central Florida
Michael S. Branicky
Michael S. Branicky University of Kansas
James C. Williams
James C. Williams The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in computer science in the USA offers a range of flexible options for both new and returning learners. Many students start with an associate degree online, which delivers foundational skills and paves the way for further study or entry-level jobs in IT.

For those seeking to maximize earning potential and job opportunities, advanced credentials can make a significant difference. There are several masters degrees that are worth it in the tech sector, especially in fields like artificial intelligence, data science, and cybersecurity.

Budget is a common concern, but there are many cheap online college classes that let you gain valuable knowledge without a huge upfront investment. Additionally, students who might not have the highest academic records can find a college that accepts low gpa, ensuring that more individuals have access to quality computer science education and online degree programs.

Best Scientists Citing Andy Podgurski

Trending Scientists