World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
81
Citations
28948
World Ranking
1008
National Ranking
538

Mary Jean Harrold publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Jean Harrold sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mary Jean Harrold D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Jean Harrold sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary Jean Harrold was affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. The data available does not include specific details about their recent papers, co-authors, or main fields of study.

No information is provided regarding frequent publication venues, book publications, or main topics covered by Mary Jean Harrold during their career.

Details about awards won by Mary Jean Harrold are not present in the data, and there is no record of specific years or citations attached to possible recognitions.

The scientist is deceased. The overview therefore reflects the past contributions and affiliations associated with Mary Jean Harrold.

Best Publications

  • Prioritizing test cases for regression testing

    G. Rothermel;R.H. Untch;Chengyun Chu;M.J. Harrold

  • Empirical evaluation of the tarantula automatic fault-localization technique

    James A. Jones;Mary Jean Harrold

  • Visualization of test information to assist fault localization

    James A. Jones;Mary Jean Harrold;John Stasko

  • Analyzing regression test selection techniques

    G. Rothermel;M.J. Harrold

  • A safe, efficient regression test selection technique

    Gregg Rothermel;Mary Jean Harrold

  • A methodology for controlling the size of a test suite

    M. Jean Harrold;Rajiv Gupta;Mary Lou Soffa

  • An orchestrated survey of methodologies for automated software test case generation

    Saswat Anand;Edmund K. Burke;Tsong Yueh Chen;John Clark

  • Test case prioritization: an empirical study

    G. Rothermel;R.H. Untch;Chengyun Chu;M.J. Harrold

  • Test‐data generation using genetic algorithms

    Roy P. Pargas;Mary Jean Harrold;Robert R. Peck

  • Test-suite reduction and prioritization for modified condition/decision coverage

    J.A. Jones;M.J. Harrold

  • An empirical study of regression test selection techniques

    Todd L. Graves;Mary Jean Harrold;Jung-Min Kim;Adam Porter

  • Automated concolic testing of smartphone apps

    Saswat Anand;Mayur Naik;Mary Jean Harrold;Hongseok Yang

  • Testing: a roadmap

    Mary Jean Harrold

  • An empirical study of regression test selection techniques

    T.L. Graves;M.J. Harrold;J. Kim;A. Porters

  • Regression test selection for Java software

    Mary Jean Harrold;James A. Jones;Tongyu Li;Donglin Liang

  • An empirical study of the effects of minimization on the fault detection capabilities of test suites

    G. Rothermel;M.J. Harrold;J. Ostrin;C. Hong

  • Performing data flow testing on classes

    Mary Jean Harrold;Gregg Rothermel

  • Slicing object-oriented software

    Loren Larsen;Mary Jean Harrold

  • Lightweight fault-localization using multiple coverage types

    Raul Santelices;James A. Jones;Yanbing Yu;Mary Jean Harrold

  • An approach to regression testing using slicing

    R. Gupta;M.J. Harrold;M.L. Soffa

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Orso
Alessandro Orso Georgia Institute of Technology
Gregg Rothermel
Gregg Rothermel North Carolina State University
James M. Rehg
James M. Rehg University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joel H. Saltz
Joel H. Saltz Stony Brook University
John Stasko
John Stasko Georgia Institute of Technology
Tahsin Kurc
Tahsin Kurc Stony Brook University
Richard Vuduc
Richard Vuduc Georgia Institute of Technology
Mauro Pezzè
Mauro Pezzè Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Mary Lou Soffa
Mary Lou Soffa University of Virginia
Nancy J. Nersessian
Nancy J. Nersessian Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring advanced education options in computer science can open many doors for your career. Many students are now choosing online degrees for their affordability and flexibility.

If you are looking to deepen your expertise without breaking the bank, consider one of the affordable master degree programs available online. For those aiming for leadership roles in tech companies or academia, pursuing an online phd leadership can expand your impact and career opportunities.

If you prefer a quicker and more accessible start, there are easy online associate degrees that can help you enter the field faster. Educators or those interested in administrative roles in education technology may benefit from online ed programs, which focus on leadership and innovation in education.

Choosing the right online degree path depends on your career goals, budget, and preferred learning pace. With such a variety of flexible options, it’s easier than ever to start or advance your computer science career.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Jean Harrold

Recently Published Articles