World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
82
Citations
26686
World Ranking
962
National Ranking
521

Joel H. Saltz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel H. Saltz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 575 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joel H. Saltz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel H. Saltz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joel H. Saltz is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research spans significant contributions in medicine and computer science, with a particular focus on applications of artificial intelligence and medical imaging.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Computer Science

Within these broader areas, their subfields of expertise include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Oncology
  • Biophysics

Joel H. Saltz's research themes and topics concentrate on:

  • AI in cancer detection
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Their publication record includes articles in notable venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Cancer Research

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Joel H. Saltz include:

  • AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions, 2020, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Clinical Characterization and Prediction of Clinical Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among US Adults Using Data From the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Characterizing Long COVID: Deep Phenotype of a Complex Condition, 2021, EBioMedicine
  • Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer, 2020, npj Breast Cancer

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include:

  • Tahsin Kurç
  • Rajarsi Gupta
  • Christopher G. Chute
  • Mary Saltz
  • Melissa Haendel

Best Publications

  • Analysis of the clustering properties of the Hilbert space-filling curve

    B. Moon;H.V. Jagadish;C. Faloutsos;J.H. Saltz

  • Spatial Organization and Molecular Correlation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Using Deep Learning on Pathology Images.

    Joel Saltz;Rajarsi Gupta;Le Hou;Tahsin Kurc

  • Patch-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Whole Slide Tissue Image Classification

    Le Hou;Dimitris Samaras;Tahsin M. Kurc;Yi Gao

  • Hadoop GIS: a high performance spatial data warehousing system over mapreduce

    Ablimit Aji;Fusheng Wang;Hoang Vo;Rubao Lee

  • Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.

    William R. Hersh;Mark G. Weiner;Peter J. Embi;Judith R. Logan

  • Active disks: programming model, algorithms and evaluation

    Anurag Acharya;Mustafa Uysal;Joel Saltz

  • AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions

    Andreas S. Panayides;Amir Amini;Nenad D. Filipovic;Ashish Sharma

  • The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, Design, Infrastructure, and Deployment.

    Melissa A Haendel;Melissa A Haendel;Christopher G Chute;Tellen D Bennett;David A Eichmann

  • MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: Multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set

    David A. Gutman;Lee A.D. Cooper;Scott N. Hwang;Chad A. Holder

  • Run-time parallelization and scheduling of loops

    J.H. Saltz;R. Mirchandaney;K. Crowley

  • Communication optimizations for irregular scientific computations on distributed memory architectures

    Raja Das;Mustafa Uysal;Joel Saltz;Yuan-Shin Hwang

  • Sumatra: A Language for Resource-Aware Mobile Programs

    Anurag Acharya;M. Ranganathan;Joel H. Saltz

  • Run-time scheduling and execution of loops on message passing machines

    Joel Saltz;Kathleen Crowley;Kathleen Crowley;Ravi Mirchandaney;Ravi Mirchandaney;Harry Berryman

  • Methods for Segmentation and Classification of Digital Microscopy Tissue Images.

    Quoc Dang Vu;Simon Graham;Tahsin Kurc;Minh Nguyen Nhat To

  • Computer-aided prognosis of neuroblastoma on whole-slide images: Classification of stromal development

    O. Sertel;J. Kong;H. Shimada;U. V. Catalyurek

  • Distributed processing of very large datasets with DataCutter

    Michael D. Beynon;Tahsin Kurc;Umit Catalyurek;Chialin Chang

  • Twenty Years of Digital Pathology: An Overview of the Road Travelled, What is on the Horizon, and the Emergence of Vendor-Neutral Archives.

    Liron Pantanowitz;Ashish Sharma;Alexis B Carter;Tahsin Kurc

  • PanCancer insights from The Cancer Genome Atlas: the pathologist's perspective.

    Lee Alex Donald Cooper;Lee Alex Donald Cooper;Elizabeth G. Demicco;Joel H. Saltz;Reid T. Powell

  • Clinical Characterization and Prediction of Clinical Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among US Adults Using Data From the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative.

    Tellen D. Bennett;Richard A. Moffitt;Janos G. Hajagos;Benjamin Amor

  • DataCutter: Middleware for Filtering Very Large Scientific Datasets on Archival Storage Systems.

    Michael D. Beynon;Renato Ferreira;Tahsin M. Kurç;Alan Sussman

  • Digital dynamic telepathology--the Virtual Microscope.

    Asmara Afework;Michael D. Beynon;Fabian E. Bustamante;Soon Cho

  • Histopathological Image Analysis Using Model-Based Intermediate Representations and Color Texture: Follicular Lymphoma Grading

    Olcay Sertel;Jun Kong;Umit V. Catalyurek;Gerard Lozanski

  • Run-Time Parallelization and Scheduling of Loops. Revision

    Joel H. Saltz;Ravi Mirchandaney;Kay Crowley

Frequent Co-Authors

Tahsin Kurc
Tahsin Kurc Stony Brook University
Ümit V. Çatalyürek
Ümit V. Çatalyürek Georgia Institute of Technology
Alan Sussman
Alan Sussman University of Maryland, College Park
Lee Cooper
Lee Cooper Northwestern University
Fusheng Wang
Fusheng Wang Stony Brook University
Dimitris Samaras
Dimitris Samaras Stony Brook University
Daniel J. Brat
Daniel J. Brat Northwestern University
Metin N. Gurcan
Metin N. Gurcan Wake Forest University
P. Sadayappan
P. Sadayappan University of Utah
Carlos S. Moreno
Carlos S. Moreno Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up numerous online degree opportunities and specialized career paths. It's important to choose online degree programs accredited by recognized agencies to ensure credibility and wider job prospects.

For students interested in the creative side of tech, pursuing a game art degree online can lead to roles in game design, animation, or interactive media. Cybersecurity is another rapidly growing field; earning a cybersecurity masters online prepares graduates to secure networks and prevent cyber threats across industries.

Alternatively, combining tech skills with project management can lead to leadership positions in construction and infrastructure. An online construction management degree blends computing knowledge with practical management skills to oversee major projects using the latest technologies.

Exploring these online degree pathways allows you to tailor your education and career to match your passions and industry demand.

Best Scientists Citing Joel H. Saltz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles