World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
35539
World Ranking
7108
National Ranking
3733

Frederick W. Miller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 432 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frederick W. Miller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick W. Miller is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on the study of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, particularly examining idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and related immunological conditions.

They have contributed to multiple publications in the field of medicine, with a significant emphasis on epidemiology, immunology, and rheumatology. Their scholarly output frequently addresses complex interactions within immune cell function, genetic factors, and muscle-related pathologies.

Recent notable papers by Miller include:

  • The increasing prevalence of autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases: an urgent call to action for improved understanding, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, 2022, Current Opinion in Immunology
  • Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Machine learning algorithms reveal unique gene expression profiles in muscle biopsies from patients with different types of myositis, 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Neutrophil dysregulation is pathogenic in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, 2020, JCI Insight
  • Retracted: Increasing Prevalence of Antinuclear Antibodies in the United States, 2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology

Frederick W. Miller collaborates frequently with other researchers in the field. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Lisa G. Rider
  • Andrew L. Mammen (20 co-authored papers)
  • Adam Schiffenbauer (20 co-authored papers)
  • Christine G. Parks (18 co-authored papers)
  • Ingrid E. Lundberg (17 co-authored papers)

Their work is regularly published in the following venues:

  • Arthritis & Rheumatology (11 publications)
  • Lara D. Veeken (10 publications)
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (8 publications)
  • Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology (7 publications)
  • Frontiers in Immunology (6 publications)

Miller's primary fields of study are medicine-focused, with subfields concentrated in:

  • Epidemiology (48 publications)
  • Immunology (35 publications)
  • Rheumatology (26 publications)
  • Genetics (16 publications)
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine (16 publications)

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis (90 publications)
  • Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (22 publications)
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (22 publications)
  • Celiac Disease Research and Management (20 publications)
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (18 publications)
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders (16 publications)
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction (16 publications)

Best Publications

  • 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups

    Ingrid E Lundberg;Anna Tjärnlund;Matteo Bottai;Victoria P Werth

  • A new approach to the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: myositis-specific autoantibodies define useful homogeneous patient groups.

    Lori A. Love;Richard L. Leff;David D. Fraser;Ira N. Targoff

  • 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Their Major Subgroups.

    Ingrid E Lundberg;Anna Tjärnlund;Matteo Bottai;Victoria P Werth

  • Measuring Therapeutic Response in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. Response Criteria Working Group Report

    Stephanie J. Lee;Daniel Wolff;Carrie Kitko;John Koreth

  • Changes in the pattern of DNA methylation associate with twin discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Biola M. Javierre;Agustin F. Fernandez;Julia Richter;Fatima Al-Shahrour

  • Aristolochic acid and the etiology of endemic (Balkan) nephropathy

    Arthur P. Grollman;Shinya Shibutani;Masaaki Moriya;Frederick Miller

  • Rituximab in the Treatment of Refractory Adult and Juvenile Dermatomyositis and Adult Polymyositis: A Randomized, Placebo-phase Trial

    Chester V. Oddis;Ann M. Reed;Rohit Aggarwal;Lisa G. Rider

  • A novel autoantibody to a 155-kd protein is associated with dermatomyositis.

    Ira N. Targoff;Ira N. Targoff;Gulnara Mamyrova;Edward P. Trieu;Osvaldo Perurena

  • In vivo targeting of inducible NO synthase with oligodeoxynucleotides protects rat kidney against ischemia.

    E Noiri;T Peresleni;F Miller;M S Goligorsky

  • Potential mechanism of emphysema: alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor recovered from lungs of cigarette smokers contains oxidized methionine and has decreased elastase inhibitory capacity.

    Harvey Carp;Frederick Miller;John R. Hoidal;Aaron Janoff

  • Prevalence and Sociodemographic Correlates of Antinuclear Antibodies In the United States

    Minoru Satoh;Edward K. L. Chan;Lindsey A. Ho;Kathryn M. Rose

  • Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis.

    Lisa G. Rider;Victoria P. Werth;Adam M. Huber;Helene Alexanderson

  • Controlled trial of plasma exchange and leukapheresis in polymyositis and dermatomyositis.

    Frederick W. Miller;Susan F. Leitman;Mary E. Cronin;Jeanne E. Hicks

  • CHARACTERIZATION OF A HUMAN MACROGLOBULIN. I. THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF ITS SUBUNIT.

    Frederick Miller;Henry Metzger

  • Current concepts in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and related disorders.

    Paul H. Plotz;Marinos Dalakas;Richard L. Leff;Lori A. Love

  • Drug therapy of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: predictors of response to prednisone, azathioprine, and methotrexate and a comparison of their efficacy

    Marshall M. Joffe;Lori A. Love;Richard L Leff;David D. Fraser

  • Epidemiology of Environmental Exposures and Human Autoimmune Diseases: Findings from a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Expert Panel Workshop

    Frederick W. Miller;Lars Alfredsson;Karen H. Costenbader;Diane L. Kamen

  • CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA FOR THE IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES

    Ira N. Targoff;Frederick W. Miller;Thomas A. Medsger;Chester V. Oddis

  • Proposed preliminary core set measures for disease outcome assessment in adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

    F. W. Miller;F. W. Miller;L. G. Rider;Y.‐L. Chung;R. Cooper

  • HLA-A, -B, -Cw, -DQA1 and -DRB1 alleles in a Caucasian population from Bethesda, USA

    S.J. Chanock;C.B. Foster;F.W. Miller;T.P. O’Hanlon

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa G. Rider
Lisa G. Rider National Institutes of Health
Ira N. Targoff
Ira N. Targoff University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Paul H. Plotz
Paul H. Plotz National Institutes of Health
Ingrid E. Lundberg
Ingrid E. Lundberg Karolinska University Hospital
Brian M. Feldman
Brian M. Feldman University of Toronto
Lauren M. Pachman
Lauren M. Pachman Northwestern University
Victoria P. Werth
Victoria P. Werth University of Pennsylvania
Janine A. Lamb
Janine A. Lamb University of Manchester
Anthony A. Amato
Anthony A. Amato Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Peter K. Gregersen
Peter K. Gregersen Feinstein Institute for Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine today offers more flexibility than ever, thanks to a growing range of accredited online programs. Many healthcare professionals seek advancement through specialized bridge programs, such as asn to nurse practitioner programs, which are designed to help registered nurses gain advanced credentials efficiently. These programs often blend online coursework with clinical placements and are a popular choice for working nurses.

If you are interested in promoting wellness and preventive care, consider online degrees in the rapidly growing field of nutrition. Accredited online degrees in nutrition cover topics like healthy eating, research in dietetics, and public health education, opening doors to diverse career paths.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing one of the best mha programs can set you on the path to managing hospitals, clinics, or healthcare systems. These flexible online programs are vital for professionals aiming to move into administrative roles.

Additionally, nurses looking to expand their qualifications may consider rn to bsn online no clinicals programs. These allow working professionals to earn a bachelor’s degree without the time commitment of on-site clinicals, making career advancement more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick W. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles