World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 7107 6676 3732 3455 432 35539

Frederick W. Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frederick W. Miller between 1965 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frederick W. Miller published across 62 years, from 1965 to 2026, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2022. 15 of the 475 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2022. 1965: 4 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 4 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 5 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 2 publications
1965 2026

475 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frederick W. Miller: publications per year, 1965 to 2026
Year Publications
1965 4
1966 0
1967 0
1968 1
1969 1
1970 0
1971 2
1972 0
1973 1
1974 1
1975 2
1976 3
1977 7
1978 3
1979 1
1980 4
1981 6
1982 3
1983 1
1984 5
1985 7
1986 0
1987 13
1988 8
1989 12
1990 9
1991 6
1992 8
1993 8
1994 12
1995 10
1996 8
1997 6
1998 4
1999 8
2000 10
2001 7
2002 7
2003 5
2004 14
2005 5
2006 11
2007 9
2008 13
2009 15
2010 9
2011 13
2012 13
2013 13
2014 20
2015 8
2016 10
2017 13
2018 9
2019 3
2020 18
2021 10
2022 24
2023 21
2024 16
2025 13
2026 2
Total 475
Download as CSV

Frederick W. Miller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 432 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 432
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Frederick W. Miller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick W. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Frederick W. Miller is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on the study of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, particularly examining idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and related immunological conditions.

They have contributed to multiple publications in the field of medicine, with a significant emphasis on epidemiology, immunology, and rheumatology. Their scholarly output frequently addresses complex interactions within immune cell function, genetic factors, and muscle-related pathologies.

Recent notable papers by Miller include:

  • The increasing prevalence of autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases: an urgent call to action for improved understanding, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, 2022, Current Opinion in Immunology
  • Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Machine learning algorithms reveal unique gene expression profiles in muscle biopsies from patients with different types of myositis, 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Neutrophil dysregulation is pathogenic in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, 2020, JCI Insight
  • Retracted: Increasing Prevalence of Antinuclear Antibodies in the United States, 2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology

Frederick W. Miller collaborates frequently with other researchers in the field. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Lisa G. Rider
  • Andrew L. Mammen (20 co-authored papers)
  • Adam Schiffenbauer (20 co-authored papers)
  • Christine G. Parks (18 co-authored papers)
  • Ingrid E. Lundberg (17 co-authored papers)

Their work is regularly published in the following venues:

  • Arthritis & Rheumatology (11 publications)
  • Lara D. Veeken (10 publications)
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (8 publications)
  • Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology (7 publications)
  • Frontiers in Immunology (6 publications)

Miller's primary fields of study are medicine-focused, with subfields concentrated in:

  • Epidemiology (48 publications)
  • Immunology (35 publications)
  • Rheumatology (26 publications)
  • Genetics (16 publications)
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine (16 publications)

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis (90 publications)
  • Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (22 publications)
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (22 publications)
  • Celiac Disease Research and Management (20 publications)
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (18 publications)
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders (16 publications)
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction (16 publications)

Best Publications

  • 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups

    Ingrid E Lundberg;Anna Tjärnlund;Matteo Bottai;Victoria P Werth

  • A new approach to the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: myositis-specific autoantibodies define useful homogeneous patient groups.

    Lori A. Love;Richard L. Leff;David D. Fraser;Ira N. Targoff

  • 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Their Major Subgroups.

    Ingrid E Lundberg;Anna Tjärnlund;Matteo Bottai;Victoria P Werth

  • Measuring Therapeutic Response in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. Response Criteria Working Group Report

    Stephanie J. Lee;Daniel Wolff;Carrie Kitko;John Koreth

  • Changes in the pattern of DNA methylation associate with twin discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Biola M. Javierre;Agustin F. Fernandez;Julia Richter;Fatima Al-Shahrour

  • Aristolochic acid and the etiology of endemic (Balkan) nephropathy

    Arthur P. Grollman;Shinya Shibutani;Masaaki Moriya;Frederick Miller

  • Rituximab in the Treatment of Refractory Adult and Juvenile Dermatomyositis and Adult Polymyositis: A Randomized, Placebo-phase Trial

    Chester V. Oddis;Ann M. Reed;Rohit Aggarwal;Lisa G. Rider

  • A novel autoantibody to a 155-kd protein is associated with dermatomyositis.

    Ira N. Targoff;Ira N. Targoff;Gulnara Mamyrova;Edward P. Trieu;Osvaldo Perurena

  • In vivo targeting of inducible NO synthase with oligodeoxynucleotides protects rat kidney against ischemia.

    E Noiri;T Peresleni;F Miller;M S Goligorsky

  • Potential mechanism of emphysema: alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor recovered from lungs of cigarette smokers contains oxidized methionine and has decreased elastase inhibitory capacity.

    Harvey Carp;Frederick Miller;John R. Hoidal;Aaron Janoff

  • Prevalence and Sociodemographic Correlates of Antinuclear Antibodies In the United States

    Minoru Satoh;Edward K. L. Chan;Lindsey A. Ho;Kathryn M. Rose

  • Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis.

    Lisa G. Rider;Victoria P. Werth;Adam M. Huber;Helene Alexanderson

  • Controlled trial of plasma exchange and leukapheresis in polymyositis and dermatomyositis.

    Frederick W. Miller;Susan F. Leitman;Mary E. Cronin;Jeanne E. Hicks

  • CHARACTERIZATION OF A HUMAN MACROGLOBULIN. I. THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF ITS SUBUNIT.

    Frederick Miller;Henry Metzger

  • Current concepts in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and related disorders.

    Paul H. Plotz;Marinos Dalakas;Richard L. Leff;Lori A. Love

  • Drug therapy of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: predictors of response to prednisone, azathioprine, and methotrexate and a comparison of their efficacy

    Marshall M. Joffe;Lori A. Love;Richard L Leff;David D. Fraser

  • Epidemiology of Environmental Exposures and Human Autoimmune Diseases: Findings from a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Expert Panel Workshop

    Frederick W. Miller;Lars Alfredsson;Karen H. Costenbader;Diane L. Kamen

  • CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA FOR THE IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES

    Ira N. Targoff;Frederick W. Miller;Thomas A. Medsger;Chester V. Oddis

  • Proposed preliminary core set measures for disease outcome assessment in adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

    F. W. Miller;F. W. Miller;L. G. Rider;Y.‐L. Chung;R. Cooper

  • HLA-A, -B, -Cw, -DQA1 and -DRB1 alleles in a Caucasian population from Bethesda, USA

    S.J. Chanock;C.B. Foster;F.W. Miller;T.P. O’Hanlon

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa G. Rider
Lisa G. Rider National Institutes of Health
Ira N. Targoff
Ira N. Targoff University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Paul H. Plotz
Paul H. Plotz National Institutes of Health
Ingrid E. Lundberg
Ingrid E. Lundberg Karolinska University Hospital
Brian M. Feldman
Brian M. Feldman University of Toronto
Lauren M. Pachman
Lauren M. Pachman Northwestern University
Victoria P. Werth
Victoria P. Werth University of Pennsylvania
Janine A. Lamb
Janine A. Lamb University of Manchester
Anthony A. Amato
Anthony A. Amato Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Peter K. Gregersen
Peter K. Gregersen Feinstein Institute for Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine today offers more flexibility than ever, thanks to a growing range of accredited online programs. Many healthcare professionals seek advancement through specialized bridge programs, such as asn to nurse practitioner programs, which are designed to help registered nurses gain advanced credentials efficiently. These programs often blend online coursework with clinical placements and are a popular choice for working nurses.

If you are interested in promoting wellness and preventive care, consider online degrees in the rapidly growing field of nutrition. Accredited online degrees in nutrition cover topics like healthy eating, research in dietetics, and public health education, opening doors to diverse career paths.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing one of the best mha programs can set you on the path to managing hospitals, clinics, or healthcare systems. These flexible online programs are vital for professionals aiming to move into administrative roles.

Additionally, nurses looking to expand their qualifications may consider rn to bsn online no clinicals programs. These allow working professionals to earn a bachelor’s degree without the time commitment of on-site clinicals, making career advancement more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick W. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles