D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Computer Science D-index 31 Citations 5,477 68 World Ranking 7603 National Ranking 125
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 35 Citations 5,405 79 World Ranking 2986 National Ranking 106

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Statistics
  • Management

His primary areas of investigation include Citation, Bibliometrics, Operations research, Citation analysis and Data science. His work deals with themes such as Social science, Field and Positive economics, which intersect with Citation. His Social science study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Normalization and Econometrics.

His Bibliometrics research integrates issues from Quality, Actuarial science, Data collection and Scientific communication. His Operations research research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Regional science, Science Citation Index, Management science and Dimension. His work carried out in the field of Citation analysis brings together such families of science as Ranking, Citation impact, Relevance and Identification.

His most cited work include:

  • New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (418 citations)
  • Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (351 citations)
  • Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (332 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Citation, Data science, Citation analysis, Bibliometrics and Bibliometric analysis. Many of his research projects under Citation are closely connected to Scientific literature with Scientific literature, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His research integrates issues of Field, Open science and Scientific communication in his study of Data science.

His Citation analysis research includes themes of Scientometrics and Operations research. His Operations research research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Interdisciplinarity, Management science and Journal Impact Factors. His research links Data collection with Bibliometrics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Citation (36.15%)
  • Data science (20.00%)
  • Citation analysis (20.00%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Data science (20.00%)
  • Citation (36.15%)
  • Open science (5.38%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Thed N. van Leeuwen mainly focuses on Data science, Citation, Open science, Knowledge management and Ranking. He combines subjects such as Social media and Scientometrics with his study of Data science. His Citation study incorporates themes from Regional science, Information retrieval, Productivity, Sample and Subject.

His Information retrieval research focuses on Self-archiving and how it connects with Bibliometrics. His study looks at the intersection of Bibliometrics and topics like Medical school with Citation impact. His Altmetrics research incorporates elements of Citation analysis, Datasets as Topic and Management science.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Evidence of Open Access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: a large-scale analysis (42 citations)
  • Using altmetrics for contextualised mapping of societal impact: from hits to networks (31 citations)
  • A scientometric overview of CORD-19 (23 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social science
  • Management
  • Statistics

His main research concerns Citation, Social media, Open science, Information retrieval and Public relations. His work often combines Citation and Societal impact of nanotechnology studies. His Social media research incorporates themes from Higher education, Corporate governance and Dominance.

His Open science research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Ranking and Knowledge management. His work deals with themes such as Penetration and Scientometrics, which intersect with Knowledge management. His study looks at the relationship between Information retrieval and fields such as Subject, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications

Henk F. Moed;R. E. De Bruin;Thed N. van Leeuwen.
Scientometrics (1995)

629 Citations

Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance

Thed N. Van Leeuwen;Henk F. Moed;Robert J. W. Tijssen;Martijn S. Visser.
Scientometrics (2001)

504 Citations

Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations

Ludo Waltman;Nees Jan van Eck;Thed N. van Leeuwen;Martijn S. Visser.
Journal of Informetrics (2011)

418 Citations

The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation

Ludo Waltman;Clara Calero-Medina;Joost Kosten;Ed C.M. Noyons.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2012)

388 Citations

Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?

Robert J. W. Tijssen;Martijn S. Visser;Thed N. van Leeuwen.
Scientometrics (2002)

281 Citations

The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence

Thed N. Van Leeuwen;Martijn S. Visser;Henk F. Moed;T. O. N. J. Nederhof.
Scientometrics (2003)

267 Citations

Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis

Ludo Waltman;Nees Jan Eck;Thed N. Leeuwen;Martijn S. Visser.
Scientometrics (2011)

235 Citations

The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible

Thed N. van Leeuwen.
Scientometrics (2006)

230 Citations

A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact

Rodrigo Costas;Thed N. van Leeuwen;María Bordons.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2010)

210 Citations

Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator

Ludo Waltman;Nees Jan van Eck;Thed N. van Leeuwen;Martijn S. Visser.
Journal of Informetrics (2013)

189 Citations

Editorial Boards

Research Evaluation
(Impact Factor: 2.8)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Thed N. van Leeuwen

Lutz Bornmann

Lutz Bornmann

Max Planck Society

Publications: 178

Loet Leydesdorff

Loet Leydesdorff

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 132

Mike Thelwall

Mike Thelwall

University of Wolverhampton

Publications: 103

Giovanni Abramo

Giovanni Abramo

National Research Council (CNR)

Publications: 82

Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

University of Rome Tor Vergata

Publications: 79

Vincent Larivière

Vincent Larivière

University of Montreal

Publications: 72

Rodrigo Costas

Rodrigo Costas

Leiden University

Publications: 68

Ludo Waltman

Ludo Waltman

Leiden University

Publications: 47

Wolfgang Glänzel

Wolfgang Glänzel

KU Leuven

Publications: 37

Ronald Rousseau

Ronald Rousseau

KU Leuven

Publications: 34

Henk F. Moed

Henk F. Moed

Sapienza University of Rome

Publications: 31

Ismael Rafols

Ismael Rafols

Leiden University

Publications: 31

Nees Jan van Eck

Nees Jan van Eck

Leiden University

Publications: 28

Félix de Moya-Anegón

Félix de Moya-Anegón

Spanish National Research Council

Publications: 27

Hans-Dieter Daniel

Hans-Dieter Daniel

ETH Zurich

Publications: 24

Yves Gingras

Yves Gingras

University of Quebec at Montreal

Publications: 22

Something went wrong. Please try again later.