World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Luciano Serafini

Luciano Serafini

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
9143
World Ranking
6479
National Ranking
150

Luciano Serafini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luciano Serafini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 270 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Luciano Serafini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luciano Serafini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luciano Serafini is affiliated with the Fondazione Bruno Kessler in Italy and has an extensive research profile primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their work covers a range of subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Molecular Biology.

Serafini's recent publications reflect a focus on topics such as Topic Modeling, Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Machine Learning and Algorithms, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques.

Examples of their recent papers include:

  • Knowledge Enhanced Neural Networks for Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation, 2023, Remote Sensing
  • Online Learning of Reusable Abstract Models for Object Goal Navigation, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Aligning and linking entity mentions in image, text, and knowledge base, 2022, Data & Knowledge Engineering
  • Knowledge Graph OLAP, 2020, Semantic Web
  • Refining neural network predictions using background knowledge, 2023, Machine Learning

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Alessandro Daniele, Sagar Malhotra, Lamberto Ballan, Alessandro Sperduti, and Tommaso Campari. Collaboration counts indicate multiple joint works, with Daniele and Malhotra each having twelve co-authored publications with Serafini.

Serafini has published notably in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), where there are 23 publications, as well as in journals and conferences like Artificial Intelligence, the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Neural Computing and Applications, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Best Publications

  • Distributed Description Logics: Assimilating Information from Peer Sources.

    Alexander Borgida;Luciano Serafini

  • C-OWL: contextualizing ontologies

    Paolo Bouquet;Fausto Giunchiglia;Frank Van Harmelen;Luciano Serafini

  • Data Management for Peer-to-Peer Computing: A Vision

    Philip A. Bernstein;Fausto Giunchiglia;Anastasios Kementsietsidis;John Mylopoulos

  • Multilanguage hierarchical logics, or: how we can do without modal logics

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Luciano Serafini

  • Semantic coordination: a new approach and an application

    Paolo Bouquet;Luciano Serafini;Stefano Zanobini

  • Contextualizing ontologies

    Paolo Bouquet;Fausto Giunchiglia;Frank van Harmelen;Luciano Serafini

  • DRAGO: distributed reasoning architecture for the semantic web

    Luciano Serafini;Andrei Tamilin

  • Web service composition as planning

    Mark Carman;Jose Luis Ambite;Luciano Serafini;Craig Knoblock

  • Toward an architecture for quantum programming

    S. Bettelli;T. Calarco;L. Serafini

  • Logic tensor networks for semantic image interpretation

    Ivan Donadello;Luciano Serafini;Artur S. d'Avila Garcez

  • Specification of a Common Framework for Characterizing Alignment

    Paolo Bouquet;Jérôme Euzenat;Enrico Franconi;Luciano Serafini

  • Model Checking Multiagent Systems

    Massimo Benerecetti;Fausto Giunchiglia;Luciano Serafini

  • Logic Tensor Networks: Deep Learning and Logical Reasoning from Data and Knowledge.

    Luciano Serafini;Artur S. d'Avila Garcez

  • Towards an Economy-Based Optimisation of File Access and Replication on a Data Grid

    M. Carman;F. Zini;L. Serafini;K. Stockinger

  • Distributed Description Logics: Directed Domain Correspondences in Federated Information Sources

    Alexander Borgida;Luciano Serafini

  • A Robust Logical and Computational Characterisation of Peer-to-Peer Database Systems

    Enrico Franconi;Gabriel M. Kuper;Andrei Lopatenko;Andrei Lopatenko;Luciano Serafini

  • Aspects of distributed and modular ontology reasoning

    Luciano Serafini;Alex Borgida;Andrei Tamilin

  • Towards content-oriented patent document processing

    Leo Wanner;Leo Wanner;Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Sören Brügmann;Joan Codina

  • Logic Tensor Networks.

    Samy Badreddine;Artur d'Avila Garcez;Luciano Serafini;Michael Spranger

  • Neural-symbolic computing: An effective methodology for principled integration of machine learning and reasoning

    Artur S. d'Avila Garcez;Marco Gori;Luís C. Lamb;Luciano Serafini

  • Comparing formal theories of context in AI

    Luciano Serafini;Paolo Bouquet

Frequent Co-Authors

Fausto Giunchiglia
Fausto Giunchiglia University of Trento
Bernardo Magnini
Bernardo Magnini Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Artur S. d'Avila Garcez
Artur S. d'Avila Garcez City, University of London
Heiner Stuckenschmidt
Heiner Stuckenschmidt University of Mannheim
Alexander Borgida
Alexander Borgida Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ioannis Kompatsiaris
Ioannis Kompatsiaris Information Technologies Institute, Greece
Paolo Traverso
Paolo Traverso Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Enrico Giunchiglia
Enrico Giunchiglia University of Genoa
Ari Karppinen
Ari Karppinen Finnish Meteorological Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open diverse career pathways beyond a traditional Computer Science program in the USA. For those seeking cost-effective options, many students consider affordable online masters programs to enhance their expertise without incurring massive debt. Additionally, education professionals and leaders can advance by pursuing the cheapest online doctorate in organizational leadership, which is especially useful for managerial roles in tech-driven organizations.

If you're just starting your journey, earning the easiest associate degree to get online can be a practical step, providing foundational skills and a quicker entry into the workforce. For those specifically interested in educational leadership within technology, pursuing an ed d degree may lead to influential roles in academic or training environments.

Each pathway offers unique advantages, from affordability and flexibility to access to specialist careers. Carefully weigh your career interests, commitment level, and budget when choosing the right online degree in the field of computer science or related areas.

Best Scientists Citing Luciano Serafini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles