World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark D. B. Eldridge

Mark D. B. Eldridge

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
9782
World Ranking
4382
National Ranking
344

Mark D. B. Eldridge publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. B. Eldridge sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 219 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark D. B. Eldridge D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. B. Eldridge sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. B. Eldridge is affiliated with the Australian Museum in Australia. Their research spans multiple domains within environmental science and molecular biology, focusing extensively on wildlife ecology and conservation, genetic diversity, and species distribution in the context of climate change.

The main fields of study for Eldridge include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, their work further concentrates on several subfields:

  • Ecology
  • Genetics
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Molecular Biology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Key topics addressed in Eldridge's research include:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Their frequent co-authors reflect ongoing collaborative efforts in these areas and include:

  • Greta J. Frankham
  • Sally Potter
  • Linda E. Neaves
  • Rebecca N. Johnson
  • Anna J. MacDonald

Eldridge has published numerous papers in a variety of scientific journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities" (2022) in Journal of Biogeography
  • "AnimalTraits - a curated animal trait database for body mass, metabolic rate and brain size" (2022) in Scientific Data
  • "Sequence Capture From Historical Museum Specimens: Maximizing Value for Population and Phylogenomic Studies" (2022) in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Limited Introgression between Rock-Wallabies with Extensive Chromosomal Rearrangements" (2021) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • "Future-proofing the koala: Synergising genomic and environmental data for effective species management" (2022) in Molecular Ecology

The scientist's frequent publication venues further illustrate their research focus. These venues include:

  • Molecular Ecology
  • Australian Journal of Zoology
  • Records of the Australian Museum
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Australian Zoologist

Best Publications

  • Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression

    Richard Frankham;Richard Frankham;Jonathan D. Ballou;Mark D. B. Eldridge;Robert C. Lacy

  • Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments : a genetic perspective

    Andrew R. Weeks;Carla M. Sgro;Andrew G. Young;Richard Frankham

  • Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations

    Richard Frankham;Richard Frankham;Jonathan D Ballou;Katherine Ralls;Mark D B Eldridge

  • Call for a Paradigm Shift in the Genetic Management of Fragmented Populations

    Katherine Ralls;Jonathan D. Ballou;Michele R. Dudash;Mark D. B. Eldridge

  • Transmission of a fatal clonal tumor by biting occurs due to depleted MHC diversity in a threatened carnivorous marsupial

    Hannah V. Siddle;Alexandre Kreiss;Mark D. B. Eldridge;Erin Noonan

  • Implications of different species concepts for conserving biodiversity

    Richard Frankham;Richard Frankham;Jonathan D. Ballou;Michele R. Dudash;Mark D.B. Eldridge

  • Unprecedented Low Levels of Genetic Variation and Inbreeding Depression in an Island Population of the Black-Footed Rock-Wallaby

    Mark D. B. Eldridge;Juliet M. King;Anne K. Loupis;Peter B. S. Spencer

  • Adaptation and conservation insights from the koala genome

    Rebecca N. Johnson;Rebecca N. Johnson;Denis O’Meally;Denis O’Meally;Zhiliang Chen;Graham J. Etherington

  • Multi-Spectral Imaging from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Enables the Assessment of Seasonal Leaf Area Dynamics of Sorghum Breeding Lines.

    Andries B. Potgieter;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Scott C. Chapman;Scott C. Chapman;Kenneth Laws

  • Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities

    Unknown

  • Chromosomal Speciation in the Genomics Era: Disentangling Phylogenetic Evolution of Rock-wallabies

    Sally Potter;Sally Potter;Jason G. Bragg;Mozes P. K. Blom;Janine E. Deakin

  • A Practical Guide for Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations

    Richard Frankham;Richard Frankham;Jonathan D. Ballou;Katherine Ralls;Mark D. B. Eldridge

  • Genomic Instability Within Centromeres of Interspecific Marsupial Hybrids

    Cushla J. Metcalfe;Kira V. Bulazel;Gianni C. Ferreri;Elizabeth Schroeder-Reiter

  • Genetic diversity in remnant mainland and "pristine"’ island populations of three endemic Australian macropodids (Marsupialia): Macropus eugenii, Lagorchestes hirsutus and Petrogale lateralis

    M.D.B. Eldridge;M.D.B. Eldridge;J.E. Kinnear;K.R. Zenger;L.M. McKenzie

  • Analysis of Phylogenomic Tree Space Resolves Relationships Among Marsupial Families

    David A Duchêne;Jason G Bragg;Jason G Bragg;Sebastián Duchêne;Linda E Neaves

  • Chromosomics: Bridging the Gap between Genomes and Chromosomes.

    Janine E Deakin;Sally Potter;Sally Potter;Rachel O'Neill;Aurora Ruiz-Herrera

  • Fine-scale spatial genetic correlation analyses reveal strong female philopatry within a brush-tailed rock-wallaby colony in southeast Queensland.

    S. L. Hazlitt;M. D. B. Eldridge;M. D. B. Eldridge;A. W. Goldizen

  • Source population of dispersing rock-wallabies (Petrogale lateralis) identified by assignment tests on multilocus genotypic data.

    M. D. B. Eldridge;J. E. Kinnear;M. L. Onus

  • Multiple biogeographical barriers identified across the monsoon tropics of northern Australia: phylogeographic analysis of the brachyotis group of rock‐wallabies

    Sally Potter;Mark D.B. Eldridge;Mark D.B. Eldridge;David A. Taggart;Steven J.B. Cooper;Steven J.B. Cooper

  • Microsatellite variation and population structure in a declining Australian Hylid Litoria aurea

    Emma L. Burns;Mark D. B. Eldridge;Mark D. B. Eldridge;Bronwyn A. Houlden

  • The Wayward Dog: Is the Australian native dog or Dingo a distinct species?

    S.M. Jackson;C.P. Groves;P.J.S. Flemming;K.P. Aplin

  • Evolution in a transmissible cancer: a study of the chromosomal changes in devil facial tumor (DFT) as it spreads through the wild Tasmanian devil population.

    Anne Maree Pearse;Kate Swift;Pamela Hodson;Bobby Hua

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Frankham
Richard Frankham Macquarie University
Katherine Ralls
Katherine Ralls Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Jonathan D. Ballou
Jonathan D. Ballou Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Robert C. Lacy
Robert C. Lacy Chicago Zoological Society
Paul Sunnucks
Paul Sunnucks Monash University
Steven J. B. Cooper
Steven J. B. Cooper University of Adelaide
David R. Jordan
David R. Jordan University of Queensland
Scott C. Chapman
Scott C. Chapman University of Queensland
Charles B. Fenster
Charles B. Fenster South Dakota State University
Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring ecology and evolution in the USA often overlaps with key trends and pathways in online education, especially in healthcare and science fields. Prospective students can benefit from flexible learning while advancing their studies and careers.

For those interested in healthcare, there are many bridge programs, such as rn to np programs that enable registered nurses to step into advanced practitioner roles. Individuals without a nursing background can pursue intensive options like online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses for accelerated entry into the field.

Choosing the right institution is crucial. Comparing capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn programs highlights key differences in curriculum, flexibility, and costs. For those seeking affordable advancement, online bsn to msn programs offer budget-friendly options to earn advanced qualifications.

The right online degree can support your passion for science, healthcare, or environmental studies, offering flexible, diverse pathways toward rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. B. Eldridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles