What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Martin Hülskamp focuses on Arabidopsis, Cell biology, Trichome, Genetics and Botany.
His Arabidopsis study results in a more complete grasp of Mutant.
His studies in Cell biology integrate themes in fields like Endoreduplication, Cell cycle, Cyclin-dependent kinase and Cytoskeleton.
His Trichome research incorporates elements of Trichome branching and Trichome patterning.
His Trichome branching study deals with Trichome morphogenesis intersecting with Cell morphogenesis.
His Botany study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Developmental biology, Transcriptional regulation and Gene.
His most cited work include:
- Genetic dissection of trichome cell development in Arabidopsis (551 citations)
- TRIPTYCHON and CAPRICE mediate lateral inhibition during trichome and root hair patterning in Arabidopsis (414 citations)
- Wild‐type ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a light microscope study of cleared whole‐mount tissue (342 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Martin Hülskamp mostly deals with Arabidopsis, Cell biology, Trichome, Genetics and Arabidopsis thaliana.
Gene covers Martin Hülskamp research in Arabidopsis.
His work deals with themes such as Endoreduplication, Morphogenesis and Cytoskeleton, which intersect with Cell biology.
The Trichome study combines topics in areas such as MYB, Trichome patterning, Trichome morphogenesis and Root hair.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Trichome differentiation and Transcriptional regulation.
His Arabidopsis thaliana study incorporates themes from Protein domain, Allele, Function and Arabis alpina.
He most often published in these fields:
- Arabidopsis (62.14%)
- Cell biology (57.86%)
- Trichome (32.86%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?
- Arabidopsis thaliana (31.43%)
- Arabidopsis (62.14%)
- Cell biology (57.86%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Arabidopsis thaliana, Arabidopsis, Cell biology, Genetics and Trichome.
His Arabidopsis thaliana research integrates issues from Arabis alpina, Genetic linkage, Allele and Protein–protein interaction.
Arabidopsis is the subject of his research, which falls under Gene.
Martin Hülskamp has researched Cell biology in several fields, including Enhancer and Guanosine.
His work on Mutant, Phenotype, Protein domain and Genetic architecture as part of general Genetics study is frequently linked to Context, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Trichome study is concerned with the larger field of Botany.
Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 and GLABRA1 Compete for Binding to GLABRA3 in Arabidopsis (43 citations)
- Arabidopsis TTG2 Regulates TRY Expression through Enhancement of Activator Complex-Triggered Activation (34 citations)
- Processing-Body Movement in Arabidopsis Depends on an Interaction between Myosins and DECAPPING PROTEIN1 (27 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Martin Hülskamp focuses on Arabidopsis thaliana, Cell biology, Arabidopsis, Root hair and Trichome.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Protein expression, Gene expression, Marker gene, Plant development and Cell type in addition to Arabidopsis thaliana.
His work on Myosin, Cytoplasm and Transport protein as part of general Cell biology research is frequently linked to Noise and Context, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
Genetics and Gene are the areas that his Arabidopsis study falls under.
His work on Conserved sequence, Protein domain and Protein–protein interaction as part of his general Genetics study is frequently connected to Ribonucleoprotein particle and Cellular immunity, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
His work in Root hair tackles topics such as Arabis alpina which are related to areas like MYB, Genetic model and Arabis.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
