World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
43
Citations
5807
World Ranking
5390
National Ranking
14

Tibor Erős publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tibor Erős sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 145 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tibor Erős D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tibor Erős sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tibor Erős is affiliated with the Balaton Limnological Institute in Hungary. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions in the subfields of ecology, nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, aquatic science, and molecular biology.

The scientist's main topics of work include fish ecology and management studies, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, hydrology and sediment transport processes, identification and quantification in food, wildlife ecology and conservation, and fish biology and ecology studies.

Tibor Erős has been involved in numerous publications in various academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Ecological Indicators
  • Ecology Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography

Recent papers associated with their work are:

  • A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research, 2021, Ecology Letters
  • Freshwater systems and ecosystem services: Challenges and chances for cross-fertilization of disciplines, 2021, AMBIO
  • A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Distance decay 2.0 - A global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities, 2022, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • From meta-system theory to the sustainable management of rivers in the Anthropocene, 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Collaborations are an important aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include István Czeglédi, Bálint Preiszner, Péter Takács, András Specziàr, and Jani Heino.

Best Publications

  • Functional diversity: a review of methodology and current knowledge in freshwater macroinvertebrate research

    Dénes Schmera;Jani Heino;János Podani;János Podani;Tibor Erős

  • Human effects on ecological connectivity in aquatic ecosystems: Integrating scientific approaches to support management and mitigation

    David A. Crook;Winsor H. Lowe;Frederick W. Allendorf;Tibor Erős

  • A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research.

    Alain Maasri;Alain Maasri;Sonja C. Jähnig;Sonja C. Jähnig;Mihai C. Adamescu;Rita Adrian;Rita Adrian

  • How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review

    A.C. Smith;P.A. Harrison;M. Pérez Soba;F. Archaux

  • Network thinking in riverscape conservation – A graph-based approach

    Tibor Erős;Dénes Schmera;Dénes Schmera;Robert S. Schick

  • Characterizing connectivity relationships in freshwaters using patch-based graphs

    Tibor Erős;Julian D. Olden;Robert S. Schick;Dénes Schmera

  • Freshwater systems and ecosystem services: Challenges and chances for cross-fertilization of disciplines.

    Ágnes Vári;Simone A. Podschun;Tibor Erős;Thomas Hein

  • A macroecological perspective of trait patterns in stream communities

    Jani Heino;Jani Heino;Dénes Schmera;Tibor Erős

  • Does isolation influence the relative role of environmental and dispersal‐related processes in stream networks? An empirical test of the network position hypothesis using multiple taxa

    Dénes Schmera;Diána Árva;Pál Boda;Erika Bódis

  • A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions

    Lorenzo Vilizzi;Gordon H. Copp;Jeffrey E. Hill;Boris Adamovich

  • Temporal variability in the spatial and environmental determinants of functional metacommunity organization – stream fish in a human-modified landscape

    T. Erős;P. Sály;P. Takács;A. Specziár

  • Partitioning the diversity of riverine fish: The roles of habitat types and non-native species

    Tibor ERőS

  • Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm

    Jani Heino;Janne Alahuhta;Terhi Ala-Hulkko;Harri Antikainen

  • A measure for assessing functional diversity in ecological communities

    Dénes Schmera;Tibor Erős;János Podani

  • A proposed unified terminology of species traits in stream ecology

    Dénes Schmera;János Podani;Jani Heino;Tibor Erős

  • Characterising functional trait diversity and trait–environment relationships in fish assemblages of boreal lakes

    Tibor Erős;Jani Heino;Jani Heino;Dénes Schmera;Martti Rask

  • Unifying research on the fragmentation of terrestrial and aquatic habitats: patches, connectivity and the matrix in riverscapes

    Tibor Erős;Evan H. Campbell Grant

  • Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR

    Unknown

  • The relative influence of spatial context and catchment- and site-scale environmental factors on stream fish assemblages in a human-modified landscape

    Péter Sály;Péter Takács;István Kiss;Peter Bíró

  • Understanding environmental change through the lens of trait-based, functional, and phylogenetic biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems

    Janne Alahuhta;Tibor Erős;Olli-Matti Kärnä;Janne Soininen

  • Comparison of Fish Assemblage Diversity in Natural and Artificial Rip-Rap Habitats in the Littoral Zone of a Large River (River Danube, Hungary)

    Tibor Erős;Balázs Tóth;András Sevcsik;Dénes Schmera

  • Human effects on ecological connectivity in aquatic ecosystems: Integrating scientific approaches to support management and mitigation ; Science of the Total Environment

    David A. Crook;Winsor H. Lowe;Frederick W. Allendorf;Tibor Erős

Frequent Co-Authors

Jani Heino
Jani Heino University of Oulu
Julian D. Olden
Julian D. Olden University of Washington
Gábor Várbíró
Gábor Várbíró Hungarian Academy of Sciences
András Báldi
András Báldi Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Marie-Josée Fortin
Marie-Josée Fortin University of Toronto
Winsor H. Lowe
Winsor H. Lowe University of Montana
Pablo A. Tedesco
Pablo A. Tedesco Paul Sabatier University
Xingli Giam
Xingli Giam University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Albert Ruhí
Albert Ruhí University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in expanding your academic or professional journey beyond Ecology and Evolution, several related online degree programs can open new directions. For those with a visual flair, the best 2 year graphic design degree online can blend creative thinking with scientific communication, which is especially valuable for illustrating research or educational materials.

Interdisciplinary skills are increasingly in demand. An online interdisciplinary studies degree career outcomes page outlines various jobs where blending science with policy, communication, or education is key. This is a flexible option for those wishing to combine ecology, evolution, and other fields.

History connects closely with biology, especially for those researching the evolution of ecosystems and civilizations. The best online master's in history programs can help build expertise in environmental history and historical ecology.

Information management is also crucial for scientific research. The cheapest library science degree online prepares graduates for careers in archiving scientific data and supporting research initiatives in educational and environmental organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Tibor Erős

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles