World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
5306
World Ranking
6885
National Ranking
86

Jonathan D. Tonkin publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan D. Tonkin sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 152 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jonathan D. Tonkin D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan D. Tonkin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan D. Tonkin is affiliated with the University of Canterbury in New Zealand and specializes in Environmental Science. Their research covers multiple subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics mainly focused on aquatic and freshwater ecosystems. Key areas include Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, and Plant and animal studies.

Jonathan D. Tonkin has authored several recent papers such as:

  • "A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research", 2021, Ecology Letters
  • "Increasing climate-driven taxonomic homogenization but functional differentiation among river macroinvertebrate assemblages", 2020, Global Change Biology
  • "The power of forecasts to advance ecological theory", 2022, Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Causes, Responses, and Implications of Anthropogenic versus Natural Flow Intermittence in River Networks", 2022, BioScience
  • "Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems", 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Jonathan D. Tonkin include:

  • Thibault Datry
  • Julian D. Olden
  • Tadeu Siqueira
  • Peter Haase
  • Núria Bonada

Publication venues in which Jonathan D. Tonkin has frequently contributed include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Ecology Letters, and BioScience.

Best Publications

  • The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: Patterns, processes, and pathways

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Florian Altermatt;Florian Altermatt;Debra S. Finn;Jani Heino

  • Seasonality and predictability shape temporal species diversity.

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Michael T. Bogan;Núria Bonada;Blanca Rios‐Touma

  • Flow regime alteration degrades ecological networks in riparian ecosystems

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;David. M. Merritt;Julian D. Olden;Lindsay V. Reynolds

  • The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: Linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity.

    Peter Haase;Peter Haase;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Stefan Stoll;Benjamin Burkhard

  • Global patterns and drivers of ecosystem functioning in rivers and riparian zones

    Scott D. Tiegs;David M. Costello;Mark W. Isken;Guy Woodward

  • Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Stefan Stoll;Andrea Sundermann;Peter Haase

  • A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research.

    Alain Maasri;Alain Maasri;Sonja C. Jähnig;Sonja C. Jähnig;Mihai C. Adamescu;Rita Adrian;Rita Adrian

  • Prepare river ecosystems for an uncertain future.

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;N. Le Roy Poff;Nick R. Bond;Avril Horne

  • Effects of changing climate on European stream invertebrate communities: A long-term data analysis

    Jonas Jourdan;Robert B. O'Hara;Roberta Bottarin;Kaisa-Leena Huttunen

  • Context dependency in biodiversity patterns of central German stream metacommunities

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Jani Heino;Andrea Sundermann;Peter Haase;Peter Haase

  • The three Rs of river ecosystem resilience: Resources, recruitment, and refugia

    Kris Van Looy;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Mathieu Floury;Catherine Leigh

  • Contrasting metacommunity structure and beta diversity in an aquatic‐floodplain system

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Stefan Stoll;Sonja C. Jähnig;Peter Haase

  • Disentangling environmental drivers of benthic invertebrate assemblages: The role of spatial scale and riverscape heterogeneity in a multiple stressor environment

    Moritz Leps;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Veronica Dahm;Peter Haase

  • Metacommunities in river networks: The importance of network structure and connectivity on patterns and processes

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Jani Heino;Florian Altermatt;Florian Altermatt

  • Moderate warming over the past 25 years has already reorganized stream invertebrate communities

    Peter Haase;Francesca Pilotto;Fengqing Li;Andrea Sundermann

  • The power of forecasts to advance ecological theory

    Unknown

  • Scale-dependent effects of river habitat quality on benthic invertebrate communities--Implications for stream restoration practice

    Stefan Stoll;Philippa Breyer;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Denise Früh

  • Time is no healer: increasing restoration age does not lead to improved benthic invertebrate communities in restored river reaches.

    Moritz Leps;Moritz Leps;Andrea Sundermann;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Armin W. Lorenz

  • Assessing drivers of benthic macroinvertebrate community structure in African highland streams: An exploration using multivariate analysis.

    Tatenda Dalu;Ryan J. Wasserman;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Mhairi E. Alexander

  • Increasing climate-driven taxonomic homogenization but functional differentiation among river macroinvertebrate assemblages.

    Théophile L. Mouton;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Fabrice Stephenson;Piet Verburg

  • Reintroduction of freshwater macroinvertebrates: challenges and opportunities.

    Jonas Jourdan;Martin Plath;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Maria Ceylan

  • Metacommunity structuring in Himalayan streams over large elevational gradients: the role of dispersal routes and niche characteristics

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Ram Devi Tachamo Shah;Deep Narayan Shah;Felicitas Hoppeler

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Haase
Peter Haase University of Duisburg-Essen
Sonja C. Jähnig
Sonja C. Jähnig Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Stefan Stoll
Stefan Stoll University of Duisburg-Essen
David A. Lytle
David A. Lytle Oregon State University
Russell G. Death
Russell G. Death Victoria University of Wellington
Andrea Sundermann
Andrea Sundermann American Museum of Natural History
Jani Heino
Jani Heino University of Oulu
Julian D. Olden
Julian D. Olden University of Washington
Steffen U. Pauls
Steffen U. Pauls Senckenberg German Entomological Institute
David M. Merritt
David M. Merritt US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're passionate about ecology and evolution, you may be interested in online degrees and diverse career pathways in related fields. Many students build on their science foundation by exploring specialized healthcare programs or interdisciplinary graduate degrees.

For those with a nursing background, rn to np programs online provide a pathway from an Associate’s Degree in Nursing to becoming a Nurse Practitioner—an option for students interested in healthcare and biological science.

Non-nurses considering a career shift can look into online direct entry msn programs. These fast-track master’s degrees allow graduates from other disciplines, such as ecology or environmental science, to transition into nursing.

Evaluating online programs is crucial for both flexibility and quality. Compare institutions with resources like wgu vs chamberlain to assess curriculum, reputation, and student outcomes.

If affordability is a concern, consider the cheapest bsn to msn online options to advance your nursing education without heavy financial burden.

These degree pathways empower you to combine your scientific interest with practical, in-demand careers—whether in healthcare, policy, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan D. Tonkin

Trending Scientists