World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
4112
World Ranking
7212
National Ranking
2430

Andrea Sundermann publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Sundermann sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 59 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Andrea Sundermann D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Sundermann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrea Sundermann is a researcher affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History in the United States, with a primary focus on environmental science. Their work encompasses a broad range of topics within this field, with particular emphasis on ecological impacts in freshwater systems.

The main fields of study for Andrea Sundermann include environmental science, with a significant concentration on ecology, nature and landscape conservation, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, water science and technology, and pollution. Their research covers several key topics, including freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology, fish ecology and management studies, environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, pharmaceutical and antibiotic environmental impacts, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, water quality and pollution assessment, and species distribution and climate change.

They have published in a variety of peer-reviewed scientific journals, with frequent publication venues comprising:

  • Environmental Sciences Europe
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Limnologica
  • Scientific Reports

Their recent papers represent a range of environmental and ecological topics, such as:

  • "Better integration of chemical pollution research will further our understanding of biodiversity loss," published in 2023 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "A new index of a water temperature equivalent for summer respiration conditions of benthic invertebrates in rivers as a bio-indicator of global climate change," published in 2022 in Limnologica
  • "Aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages in rivers influenced by mining activities," published in 2022 in Scientific Reports
  • "Effects of multiple stressors on benthic invertebrates using Water Framework Directive monitoring data," published in 2023 in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Economic costs of invasive species in Germany," published in 2021 in NeoBiota

Andrea Sundermann often collaborates with various co-authors, including Matthias Oetken and Ariane Moulinec, with whom they have six joint publications each. Other frequent collaborators include Jörg Oehlmann with four publications, as well as Sarah Johann and Henner Hollert, both with three joint works.

Best Publications

  • River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings.

    Andrea Sundermann;Stefan Stoll;Peter Haase

  • The impact of hydromorphological restoration on river ecological status: a comparison of fish, benthic invertebrates, and macrophytes

    P. Haase;D. Hering;S. C. Jähnig;A. W. Lorenz

  • Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: development of a practical standardised protocol for macroinvertebrate sampling and sorting

    Peter Haase;Susanne Lohse;Steffen Pauls;Karin Schindehütte

  • River restoration success: a question of perception

    S. C. Jähnig;A. W. Lorenz;D. Hering;C. Antons

  • Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Stefan Stoll;Andrea Sundermann;Peter Haase

  • Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: selection of candidate metrics.

    Daniel Hering;Carolin Meier;Claudia Rawer-Jost;Christian K. Feld

  • Effects of changing climate on European stream invertebrate communities: A long-term data analysis

    Jonas Jourdan;Robert B. O'Hara;Roberta Bottarin;Kaisa-Leena Huttunen

  • First audit of macroinvertebrate samples from an EU Water Framework Directive monitoring program: human error greatly lowers precision of assessment results.

    Peter Haase;Steffen U. Pauls;Steffen U. Pauls;Karin Schindehütte;Andrea Sundermann

  • Context dependency in biodiversity patterns of central German stream metacommunities

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Jani Heino;Andrea Sundermann;Peter Haase;Peter Haase

  • Cross-realm assessment of climate change impacts on species’ abundance trends

    Diana E. Bowler;Christian Hof;Peter Haase;Peter Haase;Ingrid Kröncke

  • Disentangling environmental drivers of benthic invertebrate assemblages: The role of spatial scale and riverscape heterogeneity in a multiple stressor environment

    Moritz Leps;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Veronica Dahm;Peter Haase

  • Stressor prioritisation in riverine ecosystems: Which environmental factors shape benthic invertebrate assemblage metrics?

    Andrea Sundermann;Miriam Gerhardt;Heike Kappes;Peter Haase

  • Hydromorphological restoration of running waters: effects on benthic invertebrate assemblages

    Andrea Sundermann;Claudia Antons;Nathalie Cron;Armin W. Lorenz

  • Water quality variables and pollution sources shaping stream macroinvertebrate communities.

    Elisabeth Berger;Elisabeth Berger;Peter Haase;Mathias Kuemmerlen;Moritz Leps

  • Moderate warming over the past 25 years has already reorganized stream invertebrate communities

    Peter Haase;Francesca Pilotto;Fengqing Li;Andrea Sundermann

  • Macrophytes respond to reach-scale river restorations

    Armin W. Lorenz;Thomas Korte;Andrea Sundermann;Kathrin Januschke

  • Assessing the impact of errors in sorting and identifying macroinvertebrate samples

    Peter Haase;John Murray-Bligh;Susanne Lohse;Steffen Pauls

  • Time is no healer: increasing restoration age does not lead to improved benthic invertebrate communities in restored river reaches.

    Moritz Leps;Moritz Leps;Andrea Sundermann;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Armin W. Lorenz

  • Do adult and YOY fish benefit from river restoration measures

    Armin W. Lorenz;Stefan Stoll;Andrea Sundermann;Peter Haase

  • The importance of the regional species pool, ecological species traits and local habitat conditions for the colonization of restored river reaches by fish.

    Stefan Stoll;Jochem Kail;Armin W. Lorenz;Andrea Sundermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Haase
Peter Haase University of Duisburg-Essen
Stefan Stoll
Stefan Stoll University of Duisburg-Essen
Armin W. Lorenz
Armin W. Lorenz University of Duisburg-Essen
Jonathan D. Tonkin
Jonathan D. Tonkin University of Canterbury
Steffen U. Pauls
Steffen U. Pauls Senckenberg German Entomological Institute
Daniel Hering
Daniel Hering University of Duisburg-Essen
Sonja C. Jähnig
Sonja C. Jähnig Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Ralph T. Clarke
Ralph T. Clarke Bournemouth University
Jani Heino
Jani Heino University of Oulu
Ralf B. Schäfer
Ralf B. Schäfer University of Kaiserslautern-Landau - RPTU

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, diverse online degree and career options are available. The rapid expansion of virtual learning means it’s easier than ever to find programs that match your interests and schedule. If you’re considering an advanced degree in a related health or science field, explore online direct entry msn programs—these offer flexible routes for non-nurses to transition into health sciences, including specializations that can intersect with environmental and ecological health research.

Those with a nursing background can compare pathways using capella vs wgu rn to bsn to choose a program best aligned with their career goals, allowing for integration of ecological or evolutionary health perspectives. Bridge options like bsn to msn programs also support career development, letting students deepen their understanding of related biological fields.

When choosing an online degree, consider enrolling at one of the non profit colleges for a more affordable, reputable, and flexible learning experience. These career pathways can support work in research, policy, conservation, public health, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Sundermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles