World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
5092
World Ranking
5938
National Ranking
312

Armin W. Lorenz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armin W. Lorenz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 105 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Armin W. Lorenz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armin W. Lorenz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Armin W. Lorenz is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany and works primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their research output totals 93 publications, focusing extensively on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Chemistry, and Ecological Modeling as key subfields.

The scientist's research topics largely concentrate on freshwater ecosystems and aquatic biology. Main topics include:

  • Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Frequent publication venues for Armin W. Lorenz include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Hydrobiologia
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Ecological Processes

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Armin W. Lorenz span from 2020 to 2024 and cover various ecological and environmental science topics:

  • "The recovery of European freshwater biodiversity has come to a halt" (2023, Nature)
  • "The Asymmetric Response Concept explains ecological consequences of multiple stressor exposure and release" (2023, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Habitat development and species arrival drive succession of the benthic invertebrate community in restored urban streams" (2023, Environmental Sciences Europe)
  • "Multi-decadal improvements in the ecological quality of European rivers are not consistently reflected in biodiversity metrics" (2024, Nature Ecology & Evolution)
  • "Woody buffer effects on water temperature: The role of spatial configuration and daily temperature fluctuations" (2020, Hydrological Processes)

Among frequent collaborators, Armin W. Lorenz has worked extensively with:

  • Daniel Hering (16 joint publications)
  • Peter Haase (11 joint publications)
  • Willem Kaijser (9 joint publications)
  • Svenja M. Gillmann (8 joint publications)
  • Jens Kiesel (7 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • The recovery of European freshwater biodiversity has come to a halt

    Unknown

  • Distribution and ecological preferences of European freshwater organisms. Volume 1. Trichoptera

    W Graf;A Lorenz;J.M.T de Figueroa;S Lücke

  • A New Method for Assessing the Impact of Hydromorphological Degradation on the Macroinvertebrate Fauna of Five German Stream Types

    Armin Lorenz;Daniel Hering;Christian Karl Feld;Peter Rolauffs

  • The impact of hydromorphological restoration on river ecological status: a comparison of fish, benthic invertebrates, and macrophytes

    P. Haase;D. Hering;S. C. Jähnig;A. W. Lorenz

  • A comparative analysis of restoration measures and their effects on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates in 26 central and southern European rivers

    Sonja C. Jähnig;Karel Brabec;Andrea Buffagni;Stefania Erba

  • River restoration success: a question of perception

    S. C. Jähnig;A. W. Lorenz;D. Hering;C. Antons

  • Upstream river morphology and riparian land use overrule local restoration effects on ecological status assessment

    Armin W. Lorenz;Christian K. Feld

  • A new method for assessing the impact of hydromorphological degradation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of five German stream types

    Unknown

  • Dispersal as a limiting factor in the colonization of restored mountain streams by plants and macroinvertebrates

    Robert J. Brederveld;Sonja C. Jähnig;Armin W. Lorenz;Stefan Brunzel

  • Re-Meandering German Lowland Streams: Qualitative and Quantitative Effects of Restoration Measures on Hydromorphology and Macroinvertebrates

    Armin W. Lorenz;Sonja C. Jähnig;Daniel Hering

  • Effects of re‐braiding measures on hydromorphology, floodplain vegetation, ground beetles and benthic invertebrates in mountain rivers

    Sonja C. Jähnig;Stefan Brunzel;Sebastian Gacek;Armin W. Lorenz

  • Vulnerable taxa of European Plecoptera (Insecta) in the context of climate change

    J. M. Tierno de Figueroa;M. J. López-Rodríguez;A. Lorenz;W. Graf

  • Hydromorphological restoration of running waters: effects on benthic invertebrate assemblages

    Andrea Sundermann;Claudia Antons;Nathalie Cron;Armin W. Lorenz

  • Moderate warming over the past 25 years has already reorganized stream invertebrate communities

    Peter Haase;Francesca Pilotto;Fengqing Li;Andrea Sundermann

  • Contrasting the roles of section length and instream habitat enhancement for river restoration success: a field study of 20 European restoration projects

    Daniel Hering;Jukka Aroviita;Annette Baattrup-Pedersen;Karel Brabec

  • Macrophytes respond to reach-scale river restorations

    Armin W. Lorenz;Thomas Korte;Andrea Sundermann;Kathrin Januschke

  • Time is no healer: increasing restoration age does not lead to improved benthic invertebrate communities in restored river reaches.

    Moritz Leps;Moritz Leps;Andrea Sundermann;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Armin W. Lorenz

  • Substrate-specific macroinvertebrate diversity patterns following stream restoration

    Sonja C. Jähnig;Armin W. Lorenz

  • Do adult and YOY fish benefit from river restoration measures

    Armin W. Lorenz;Stefan Stoll;Andrea Sundermann;Peter Haase

  • Typology of streams in Germany based on benthic invertebrates: Ecoregions, zonation, geology and substrate

    Armin Lorenz;Christian K. Feld;Daniel Hering

  • The importance of the regional species pool, ecological species traits and local habitat conditions for the colonization of restored river reaches by fish.

    Stefan Stoll;Jochem Kail;Armin W. Lorenz;Andrea Sundermann

  • Effects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics

    Ralph T. Clarke;Armin Lorenz;Leonard Sandin;Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber

  • The AQEM/STAR taxalist : a pan-European macro-invertebrate ecological database and taxa inventory

    Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber;Wolfram Graf;Armin Lorenz;Otto Moog

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Hering
Daniel Hering University of Duisburg-Essen
Peter Haase
Peter Haase University of Duisburg-Essen
Andrea Sundermann
Andrea Sundermann American Museum of Natural History
Sonja C. Jähnig
Sonja C. Jähnig Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Stefan Stoll
Stefan Stoll University of Duisburg-Essen
Wolfram Graf
Wolfram Graf BOKU University
Piet F. M. Verdonschot
Piet F. M. Verdonschot Wageningen University & Research
Nikolai Friberg
Nikolai Friberg Aarhus University
Jonathan D. Tonkin
Jonathan D. Tonkin University of Canterbury
Bernd Sures
Bernd Sures University of Duisburg-Essen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career opportunities related to Ecology and Evolution often leads students to interdisciplinary fields, including healthcare and biological research. Many roles, especially those combining science and public service, require advanced education and specialized training.

For example, aspiring nurse practitioners might wonder how many years to become a nurse practitioner. The typical journey involves a blend of nursing and biological studies, making it relevant for those with backgrounds in the life sciences. Accelerated programs, like the 6-month rn to bsn program, allow registered nurses to quickly advance their education—ideal for those who want to build on their science expertise efficiently.

For professionals seeking further advancement, online bridge options such as adn to np programs online provide flexible pathways to become nurse practitioners. Similarly, individuals with non-nursing backgrounds interested in healthcare can explore direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online. These programs often value skills learned in environmental and evolutionary studies, offering a unique career transition for science graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Armin W. Lorenz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles