World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Diego Melgar publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diego Melgar sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Diego Melgar D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diego Melgar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diego Melgar is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States and has an extensive publication record in earth and planetary sciences, particularly in geophysics and related fields. Their research primarily focuses on earthquake and tectonic studies, seismology, and earthquake detection and analysis.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Sub- and super-shear ruptures during the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 earthquake doublet in SE Türkiye (2023), published in Seismica
  • Rupture kinematics of 2020 January 24 Mw 6.7 Doğanyol-Sivrice, Turkey earthquake on the East Anatolian Fault Zone imaged by space geodesy (2020), published in Geophysical Journal International

Melgar has contributed to understanding seismic ruptures and rupture processes as well as the use of geodetic data to analyze fault activity. Their work intersects with advanced methodologies, including the application of artificial intelligence to crustal deformation and earthquake early warning.

Main fields of study in Melgar's work include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Computer Science

Specific subfields covered in Melgar's research are:

  • Geophysics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Geology

Key research topics explored are:

  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Melgar include:

  • Brendan W. Crowell
  • Valerie J. Sahakian
  • Amanda M. Thomas
  • J. Searcy
  • Jiun-Ting Lin

Melgar has published extensively in several venues, with notable quantities of work appearing in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Seismica
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Seismological Research Letters

Through their work, Melgar integrates geophysical observation, computational techniques, and seismic data interpretation to contribute to the understanding of earthquake mechanics and hazard assessment.

Best Publications

  • Slip pulse and resonance of the Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal.

    John Galetzka;D. Melgar;J.F. Genrich;J. Geng

  • Earthquake Early Warning: Advances, Scientific Challenges, and Societal Needs

    Richard M. Allen;Diego Melgar

  • Real-Time Strong-Motion Broadband Displacements from Collocated GPS and Accelerometers

    Yehuda Bock;Diego Melgar;Brendan W. Crowell

  • Sub- and super-shear ruptures during the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 earthquake doublet in SE Türkiye

    Unknown

  • Physical applications of GPS geodesy: a review.

    Yehuda Bock;Diego Melgar;Diego Melgar

  • Line of Sight Displacement from ALOS-2 Interferometry: Mw 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake and Mw 7.3 Aftershock

    Eric O. Lindsey;Ryo Natsuaki;Xiaohua Xu;Masanobu Shimada

  • Earthquake magnitude calculation without saturation from the scaling of peak ground displacement

    Diego Melgar;Brendan W. Crowell;Jianghui Geng;Richard M. Allen

  • A new seismogeodetic approach applied to GPS and accelerometer observations of the 2012 Brawley seismic swarm: Implications for earthquake early warning

    Jianghui Geng;Yehuda Bock;Diego Melgar;Brendan W. Crowell

  • Slip segmentation and slow rupture to the trench during the 2015, Mw8.3 Illapel, Chile earthquake

    Diego Melgar;Wenyuan Fan;Sebastian Riquelme;Jianghui Geng

  • Real‐time inversion of GPS data for finite fault modeling and rapid hazard assessment

    Brendan W. Crowell;Yehuda Bock;Diego Melgar

  • Real‐time centroid moment tensor determination for large earthquakes from local and regional displacement records

    Diego Melgar;Yehuda Bock;Brendan W. Crowell

  • Kinematic earthquake source inversion and tsunami runup prediction with regional geophysical data

    D. Melgar;D. Melgar;Y. Bock

  • Earthquake magnitude scaling using seismogeodetic data

    Brendan W. Crowell;Brendan W. Crowell;Diego Melgar;Yehuda Bock;Jennifer S. Haase

  • On robust and reliable automated baseline corrections for strong motion seismology

    Diego Melgar;Yehuda Bock;Dominga Sanchez;Brendan W. Crowell

  • Complex Rupture of an Immature Fault Zone: A Simultaneous Kinematic Model of the 2019 Ridgecrest, CA Earthquakes

    D. E. Goldberg;D. Melgar;V. J. Sahakian;A. M. Thomas

  • Near-field tsunami models with rapid earthquake source inversions from land- and ocean-based observations: The potential for forecast and warning

    Diego Melgar;Yehuda Bock

  • Kinematic rupture scenarios and synthetic displacement data: An example application to the Cascadia subduction zone

    Diego Melgar;Randall J. LeVeque;Douglas S. Dreger;Richard M. Allen

  • Local tsunami warnings: Perspectives from recent large events

    Diego Melgar;Richard M. Allen;Sebastian Riquelme;Jianghui Geng;Jianghui Geng

  • Source Mechanism and Rupture Process of the 24 January 2020 Mw 6.7 Doğanyol–Sivrice Earthquake obtained from Seismological Waveform Analysis and Space Geodetic Observations on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey)

    Tuncay Taymaz;Athanassios Ganas;Seda Yolsal-Çevikbilen;Felipe Vera

  • Rapid modeling of the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku‐oki earthquake with seismogeodesy

    Diego Melgar;Brendan W. Crowell;Yehuda Bock;Jennifer S. Haase

  • Seismogeodesy of the 2014 Mw6.1 Napa earthquake, California: Rapid response and modeling of fast rupture on a dipping strike‐slip fault

    Diego Melgar;Jianghui Geng;Brendan W. Crowell;Jennifer S. Haase

Frequent Co-Authors

Yehuda Bock
Yehuda Bock University of California, San Diego
Jianghui Geng
Jianghui Geng Wuhan University
Richard M. Allen
Richard M. Allen University of California, Berkeley
Jennifer S. Haase
Jennifer S. Haase University of California, San Diego
Gavin P. Hayes
Gavin P. Hayes United States Geological Survey
Randall J. LeVeque
Randall J. LeVeque University of Washington
Sergio Barrientos
Sergio Barrientos University of Chile
Shri Krishna Singh
Shri Krishna Singh National Autonomous University of Mexico
Marino Protti
Marino Protti University of California, Santa Cruz
Paul Bodin
Paul Bodin University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities significantly. Many seniors seek flexible education options, and programs like one year degrees for seniors offer streamlined paths to gain new skills without long-term commitments.

Additionally, a degree in library science complements Earth Science by deepening research and information management skills. The ala accredited library science programs online provide reputable education for those aiming to support scientific research institutions or public information centers.

Understanding what is library science can also be valuable, as it emphasizes organizing and preserving scientific data, which is critical in environmental studies and education.

Emerging fields like environmental photography combine science with creativity. Many students turn to photography colleges online to develop skills that highlight environmental issues through visual storytelling, a growing area in awareness campaigns and media.

Best Scientists Citing Diego Melgar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles