World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
58
Citations
15654
World Ranking
2125
National Ranking
919

Robert W. Clayton publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Clayton sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 271 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Robert W. Clayton D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Clayton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert W. Clayton is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on geophysics. Within this discipline, their work covers several subfields, including geophysics, artificial intelligence, ocean engineering, civil and structural engineering, and astronomy and astrophysics.

The main topics addressed in their research include seismic waves and analysis, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, seismology and earthquake studies, earthquake and tectonic studies, high-pressure geophysics and materials, seismic performance and analysis, and geophysical methods and applications.

Their recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • "Seismic Wave Propagation and Inversion with Neural Operators," 2021, published in The Seismic Record
  • "Urban Basin Structure Imaging Based on Dense Arrays and Bayesian Array-Based Coherent Receiver Functions," 2021, published in Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "Rapid Seismic Waveform Modeling and Inversion With Neural Operators," 2023, published in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • "Using a Time-Based Subarray Method to Extract and Invert Noise-Derived Body Waves at Long Beach, California," 2020, published in Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "Imaging the Subsurface with Ambient Noise Autocorrelations," 2020, published in Seismological Research Letters

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Robert W. Clayton include:

  • Zachary E. Ross
  • Kamyar Azizzadenesheli
  • Jorge C. Castellanos
  • Patricia Persaud
  • Caifeng Zou

Their work is regularly published in several established venues, notable for their contributions to seismology and geophysical research. These publication venues include:

  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations

    Robert Clayton;Björn Engquist

  • Lower mantle heterogeneity, dynamic topography and the geoid

    Bradford H. Hager;Robert W. Clayton;Mark A. Richards;Robert P. Comer;Robert P. Comer

  • Finite difference simulations of seismic scattering: Implications for the propagation of short‐period seismic waves in the crust and models of crustal heterogeneity

    Arthur Frankel;Robert W. Clayton

  • Time series modelling and maximum entropy

    Tad J. Ulrych;Rob W. Clayton

  • High-resolution 3D shallow crustal structure in Long Beach, California: Application of ambient noise tomography on a dense seismic array

    Fan Chi Lin;Dunzhu Li;Robert W. Clayton;Dan Hollis

  • Adaptation of back projection tomography to seismic travel time problems

    Eugene Humphreys;Robert W. Clayton

  • A Born-WKBJ inversion method for acoustic reflection data

    Robert W. Clayton;Robert H. Stolt

  • Source shape estimation and deconvolution of teleseismic bodywaves

    Rob W. Clayton;Ralph A. Wiggins

  • The SCEC Southern California Reference Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model Version 2

    Harold Magistrale;Steven Day;Robert W. Clayton;Robert Graves

  • Constraints on the Structure of Mantle Convection Using Seismic Observations, Flow Models, and the Geoid

    Bradford H. Hager;Robert W. Clayton

  • The origin of deep ocean microseisms in the North Atlantic Ocean

    Sharon Kedar;Michael Longuet-Higgins;Frank Webb;Nicholas Graham

  • Horizontal subduction and truncation of the Cocos Plate beneath central Mexico

    Xyoli Pérez-Campos;YoungHee Kim;Allen Husker;Paul M. Davis

  • Absorbing boundary conditions for wave-equation migration

    Robert W. Clayton;Björn Engquist

  • Origin of high mountains in the continents: The Southern Sierra Nevada

    Brian Wernicke;Robert Clayton;Mihai Ducea;Craig H. Jones

  • Subducting Slab Ultra-Slow Velocity Layer Coincident with Silent Earthquakes in Southern Mexico

    Teh-Ru Alex Song;Donald. V. Helmberger;Michael R. Brudzinski;Robert W. Clayton

  • A tomographic image of mantle structure beneath Southern California

    Eugene Humphreys;Robert W. Clayton;Bradford H. Hager

  • Nonvolcanic tremor observed in the Mexican subduction zone

    Juan S. Payero;Juan S. Payero;Vladimir Kostoglodov;Nikolai Shapiro;Takeshi Mikumo

  • P and S wave travel time inversions for subducting slab under the island arcs of the northwest Pacific

    Hua-Wei Zhou;Robert W. Clayton

  • Mantle Heterogeneities and the SCEC Reference Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model Version 3

    M. D. Kohler;H. Magistrale;R. W. Clayton

  • Retrieval of Moho‐reflected shear wave arrivals from ambient seismic noise

    Zhongwen Zhan;Zhongwen Zhan;Sidao Ni;Don V. Helmberger;Robert W. Clayton

  • A finite-difference simulation of wave propagation in two-dimensional random media

    Arthur Frankel;Robert W. Clayton

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas H. Heaton
Thomas H. Heaton California Institute of Technology
Paul M. Davis
Paul M. Davis University of California, Los Angeles
Joann M. Stock
Joann M. Stock California Institute of Technology
Donald V. Helmberger
Donald V. Helmberger California Institute of Technology
Egill Hauksson
Egill Hauksson California Institute of Technology
Gary S. Fuis
Gary S. Fuis United States Geological Survey
Adam M. Dziewonski
Adam M. Dziewonski Harvard University
Eugene D. Humphreys
Eugene D. Humphreys University of Oregon
Hiroo Kanamori
Hiroo Kanamori California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths, and many students are now exploring flexible online options to advance their education. Veterans, for example, often benefit from programs like an online Spanish bachelor degree for veterans, which can complement Earth Science skills with valuable language proficiency for international fieldwork or research.

Creative professionals interested in environmental communication may find value in an online MFA. This degree helps develop storytelling techniques essential for raising public awareness about Earth Science issues.

Those aiming for leadership or organizational roles in environmental firms could enhance their qualifications through an online masters degree in human resource management. Understanding workforce dynamics is critical to managing teams focused on sustainability and natural resource management.

Lastly, Earth Science remains a popular field for lifelong learners, with many older adults returning to study. Online degrees for older adults provide flexible schedules and supportive communities, making it easier to explore new scientific interests at any age.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Clayton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles