World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ernst H. W. Koster

Ernst H. W. Koster

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 78 1585 1418 20 20 265 22908

Ernst H. W. Koster publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ernst H. W. Koster between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ernst H. W. Koster published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2025. 55 of the 330 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2025. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 30 publications
2001 2025

330 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ernst H. W. Koster: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 4
2004 6
2005 8
2006 11
2007 11
2008 4
2009 11
2010 14
2011 14
2012 17
2013 17
2014 22
2015 20
2016 15
2017 16
2018 14
2019 13
2020 11
2021 22
2022 15
2023 9
2024 25
2025 30
Total 330
Download as CSV

Ernst H. W. Koster publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst H. W. Koster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 265 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 265
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ernst H. W. Koster D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst H. W. Koster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 78
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ernst H. W. Koster is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has a substantial body of research primarily within the field of psychology. Their work is particularly concentrated in experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology, with additional contributions to applied psychology and sociology and political science.

The scientist's research encompasses a broad range of topics in mental health, with a focus on anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Other notable areas of emphasis include functional brain connectivity studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, the impact of technology on adolescents, digital mental health interventions, and cognitive abilities and testing.

Among recent publications are:

  • "The relationship between Instagram use and indicators of mental health: A systematic review" (2021) in Computers in Human Behavior Reports
  • "Social media use and well-being: A prospective experience-sampling study" (2020) in Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Cognitive control training for children with anxiety and depression: A systematic review" (2022) in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "The Human Affectome" (2023) in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Bridges over Troubled Waters: Mapping the Interplay Between Anxiety, Depression and Stress Through Network Analysis of the DASS-21" (2020) in Cognitive Therapy and Research

Frequent co-authors in their work include Kristof Hoorelbeke, Rudi De Raedt, Yannick Vander Zwalmen, Eni S. Becker, and Chris Baeken, reflecting collaboration in multiple studies related to their areas of expertise.

Ernst H. W. Koster has contributed to several journals repeatedly, with notable publication venues being:

  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Computers in Human Behavior Reports

The scientist also has a published book titled Psychologische ondersteuning na COVID-19-klachten en opname: een behandelleidraad voor hulpverleners (2021), published by Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

    Josh M. Cisler;Ernst H.W. Koster

  • Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: the impaired disengagement hypothesis.

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Evi De Lissnyder;Nazanin Derakshan;Rudi De Raedt

  • Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Bruno Verschuere;Jan De Houwer

  • Understanding vulnerability for depression from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: A reappraisal of attentional factors and a new conceptual framework

    Rudi De Raedt;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety

    Bram Van Bockstaele;Bruno Verschuere;Helen Tibboel;Jan De Houwer

  • Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance.

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Bruno Verschuere;Stefaan Van Damme

  • Mood-congruent attentional bias in dysphoria: maintained attention to and impaired disengagement from negative information.

    Ernst H. W. Koster;Rudi De Raedt;Ellen Goeleven;Erik Franck

  • Deficient inhibition of emotional information in depression.

    Ellen Goeleven;Rudi De Raedt;Saskia Baert;Ernst H.W. Koster

  • Clinical Efficacy of Attentional Bias Modification Procedures: An Updated Meta‐Analysis

    Cristina Mogoaşe;Daniel David;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • Does Imminent Threat Capture and Hold Attention

    Ernst H. W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme;Bruno Verschuere

  • The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression.

    Jonas Everaert;Ernst H.W. Koster;Nazanin Derakshan

  • Time-course of attention for threatening pictures in high and low trait anxiety.

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Bruno Verschuere;Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme

  • Introduction to the Special Section on Cognitive Bias Modification in Emotional Disorders

    Ernst H. W. Koster;Elaine Fox;Colin MacLeod

  • The Default Mode Network and Recurrent Depression: A Neurobiological Model of Cognitive Risk Factors

    Igor Marchetti;Ernst H. W. Koster;Edmund J. Sonuga-Barke;Rudi De Raedt

  • Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles.

    Colin MacLeod;Ernst H. W. Koster;Elaine Fox

  • A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression.

    Jonas Everaert;Jonas Everaert;Ioana R. Podina;Ernst H.W. Koster

  • Motivation and cognitive control in depression

    Ivan Grahek;Amitai Shenhav;Sebastian Musslick;Ruth M. Krebs

  • Temporal Dynamics of Attentional Bias

    Ariel Zvielli;Amit Bernstein;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • Attentional bias training in depression: Therapeutic effects depend on depression severity

    Saskia Baert;Rudi De Raedt;Rik Schacht;Ernst H.W. Koster

  • A resilience framework for promoting stable remission from depression.

    Christian E. Waugh;Ernst H.W. Koster

  • Attentional biases for angry faces in unipolar depression

    Lemke Leyman;Rudi De Raedt;Rik Schacht;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression: a state-of-the-art

    J. Everaert;E.H.W. Koster;Nazanin Derakhshan

Frequent Co-Authors

Rudi De Raedt
Rudi De Raedt Ghent University
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Nazanin Derakshan
Nazanin Derakshan Birkbeck, University of London
Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Stefaan Van Damme
Stefaan Van Damme Ghent University
Peter J. de Jong
Peter J. de Jong University of Groningen
Chris Baeken
Chris Baeken Ghent University
Amit Bernstein
Amit Bernstein University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As psychology remains a growing and diverse field, students have more options than ever before to find the right pathway—especially with the rise of online and hybrid formats. Finding quality programs can feel overwhelming, but resources highlighting top-ranked psychology degree programs in University, MS and the popular psychology programs in USA offer guidance for both new and returning students.

Online psychology degrees make it easier to balance work, life, and study, while still accessing reputable instruction. For professionals looking to advance, exploring the most valuable online psychology programs in Philadelphia can provide insight into programs that deliver real-world value and career flexibility.

If affordability is a key concern, searching for the best value psychology degrees in Arizona uncovers options that combine quality education and cost effectiveness. Ultimately, a psychology degree can open doors in counseling, research, education, business, and healthcare—offering a wealth of career pathways for graduates nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Ernst H. W. Koster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles