World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
4486
World Ranking
7619
National Ranking
391

Stefan Stoll publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Stoll sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 98 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stefan Stoll D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Stoll sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Stoll is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany and has a primary research focus in Environmental Science, with 56 publications in this field. Their work spans several subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Molecular Biology, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's research covers diverse topics, prominently featuring Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Plant and Animal Studies, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Diversity and Ecology, and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.

Recent publications by Stefan Stoll include:

  • Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe (2020, Nature Communications)
  • The recovery of European freshwater biodiversity has come to a halt (2023, Nature)
  • Temperature drives variation in flying insect biomass across a German malaise trap network (2021, Insect Conservation and Diversity)
  • A comparison of different Malaise trap types (2022, Insect Conservation and Diversity)
  • Taxonomic and functional reorganization in Central European stream macroinvertebrate communities over 25 years (2023, The Science of The Total Environment)

Stefan Stoll collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Peter Haase
  • Ellen A. R. Welti
  • Jörn Buse
  • Jörg Müller
  • Mark Frenzel

They publish regularly in a number of scientific venues with multiple publications in:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Insect Conservation and Diversity
  • Ecological Modelling
  • Ecosystem Services
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe

    Francesca Pilotto;Francesca Pilotto;Ingolf Kühn;Ingolf Kühn;Rita Adrian;Renate Alber

  • Early stage litter decomposition across biomes

    Ika Djukic;Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas;Inger Kappel Schmidt;Klaus Steenberg Larsen

  • River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings.

    Andrea Sundermann;Stefan Stoll;Peter Haase

  • The recovery of European freshwater biodiversity has come to a halt

    Unknown

  • The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: Linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity.

    Peter Haase;Peter Haase;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Stefan Stoll;Benjamin Burkhard

  • Bridging the gap between biodiversity data and policy reporting needs: An Essential Biodiversity Variables perspective

    Ilse R. Geijzendorffer;Eugenie C. Regan;Henrique M. Pereira;Lluis Brotons

  • Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Stefan Stoll;Andrea Sundermann;Peter Haase

  • Assessment of ecosystem integrity and service gradients across Europe using the LTER Europe network

    Stefan Stoll;Mark Frenzel;Benjamin Burkhard;Mihai Adamescu

  • Cross-realm assessment of climate change impacts on species’ abundance trends

    Diana E. Bowler;Christian Hof;Peter Haase;Peter Haase;Ingrid Kröncke

  • Assessing resilience in long-term ecological data sets

    F. Müller;M. Bergmann;R. Dannowski;J.W. Dippner

  • A suite of essential biodiversity variables for detecting critical biodiversity change

    Dirk S. Schmeller;Dirk S. Schmeller;Lauren V. Weatherdon;Adeline Loyau;Alberte Bondeau

  • Contrasting metacommunity structure and beta diversity in an aquatic‐floodplain system

    Jonathan D. Tonkin;Stefan Stoll;Sonja C. Jähnig;Peter Haase

  • Application of species distribution models in stream ecosystems: the challenges of spatial and temporal scale, environmental predictors and species occurrence data

    Sami Domisch;Sonja C. Jähnig;John P. Simaika;Mathias Kuemmerlen

  • Temperature drives variation in flying insect biomass across a German malaise trap network

    Ellen A. R. Welti;Petr Zajicek;Mark Frenzel;Manfred Ayasse

  • Moderate warming over the past 25 years has already reorganized stream invertebrate communities

    Peter Haase;Francesca Pilotto;Fengqing Li;Andrea Sundermann

  • Effects of ship-induced waves on aquatic ecosystems.

    Friederike Gabel;Stefan Lorenz;Stefan Lorenz;Stefan Stoll;Stefan Stoll

  • Scale-dependent effects of river habitat quality on benthic invertebrate communities--Implications for stream restoration practice

    Stefan Stoll;Philippa Breyer;Jonathan D. Tonkin;Denise Früh

  • The long-term ecological research (LTER) network: Relevance, current status, future perspective and examples from marine, freshwater and terrestrial long-term observation

    Peter Haase;Mark Frenzel;Stefan Klotz;Martin Musche

  • Do adult and YOY fish benefit from river restoration measures

    Armin W. Lorenz;Stefan Stoll;Andrea Sundermann;Peter Haase

  • The importance of the regional species pool, ecological species traits and local habitat conditions for the colonization of restored river reaches by fish.

    Stefan Stoll;Jochem Kail;Armin W. Lorenz;Andrea Sundermann

  • Unlocking biodiversity data: Prioritization and filling the gaps in biodiversity observation data in Europe

    Florian T. Wetzel;Heather C. Bingham;Quentin Groom;Peter Haase;Peter Haase

  • Waves affect predator–prey interactions between fish and benthic invertebrates

    Friederike Gabel;Stefan Stoll;Philipp Fischer;Martin T. Pusch

  • Small and impoverished regional species pools constrain colonisation of restored river reaches by fishes

    Stefan Stoll;Andrea Sundermann;Armin W. Lorenz;Jochem Kail

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Haase
Peter Haase University of Duisburg-Essen
Jonathan D. Tonkin
Jonathan D. Tonkin University of Canterbury
Andrea Sundermann
Andrea Sundermann American Museum of Natural History
Armin W. Lorenz
Armin W. Lorenz University of Duisburg-Essen
Dirk S. Schmeller
Dirk S. Schmeller National Polytechnic Institute of Toulouse
Sonja C. Jähnig
Sonja C. Jähnig Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jörg Müller
Jörg Müller Heinz Sielmann Foundation
Michael T. Monaghan
Michael T. Monaghan Freie Universität Berlin
Ingolf Kühn
Ingolf Kühn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Sami Domisch
Sami Domisch Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Ecology and Evolution graduates can pursue a broad range of career options, many of which can be enhanced through flexible online study. If you're passionate about social impact, a masters in human services online may equip you with advanced skills in public health or community support, connecting scientific knowledge with practical outreach.

Those interested in speech, language, and communication may wonder: can you become a speech pathologist with an education degree? This is a common career shift for those wanting to blend education with clinical practice, and coursework in evolutionary biology or human behavior can provide a unique background.

Environmental design is another exciting avenue, and an architecture online degree can prepare you for roles in sustainable planning or green building. Math is fundamental in ecology and evolution—consider an online degree mathematics to build your analytical skills for data-driven research and policy work.

Online programs provide the flexibility to specialize or expand your career, making them an excellent option for those inspired by the natural world and eager for interdisciplinary growth.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Stoll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles