World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
63
Citations
12693
World Ranking
1984
National Ranking
238

Ralph T. Clarke publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralph T. Clarke sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 188 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ralph T. Clarke D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralph T. Clarke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ralph T. Clarke is affiliated with Bournemouth University in the United Kingdom. The research activities of this scientist are not detailed through recent publications or specific topics, but the institutional connection provides a context for their academic environment.

There are no available records of recent papers or publications that directly attribute work to this scientist. Consequently, information on publication venues, co-authors, or specific papers produced is not present.

No information is provided regarding the primary fields of study or subfields, which suggests a lack of publicly reported specialization or a limited database available on the scientist's research focus.

Similarly, main topics of work related to Ralph T. Clarke are not documented, and there are no listed awards or recognitions attributed to this individual as per the available data.

Details such as book publications or a list of recurring collaborators have not been disclosed in the sources given.

Ralph T. Clarke is currently living, according to the data, and no further personal or professional biography elements are accessible from the source.

Best Publications

  • Comparative Losses of British Butterflies, Birds, and Plants and the Global Extinction Crisis

    J. A. Thomas;M. G. Telfer;D. B. Roy;C. D. Preston

  • The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes

    J. A. Thomas;N. A. D. Bourn;R. T. Clarke;K. E. Stewart

  • Long distance seed dispersal by wind: measuring and modelling the tail of the curve.

    James M. Bullock;Ralph T. Clarke

  • Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside.

    R. H. Haines-Young;C. J. Barr;H. I. J. Black;D. J. Briggs

  • RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers

    Ralph T Clarke;John F Wright;Mike T Furse

  • Confidence limits for regression relationships between distance matrices: Estimating gene flow with distance

    Ralph T. Clarke;Peter Rothery;Alan F. Raybould

  • Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea butterfly.

    J. A. Thomas;D. J. Simcox;R. T. Clarke

  • Countryside Survey 1990: main report. (Countryside 1990 vol.2)

    C. J. Barr;R. G. H. Bunce;R. T. Clarke;R. M. Fuller

  • The ecology of Myrmica ants in relation to the conservation of Maculinea butterflies

    G.W. Elmes;J.A. Thomas;J.C. Wardlaw;M.E. Hochberg

  • Land classification for strategic ecological survey

    R. G. H. Bunce;C. J. Barr;Ralph T. Clarke;David C. Howard

  • Ecology and declining status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain

    J. A. Thomas;C. D. Thomas;D. J. Simcox;R. T. Clarke

  • ITE Merlewood Land Classification of Great Britain

    R. G. H. Bunce;C. J. Barr;R. T. Clarke;D. C. Howard

  • Intraspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range

    J. A. Thomas;R. J. Rose;R. T. Clarke;C. D. Thomas

  • Predicting mortality in novel environments: tests and sensitivity of a behaviour‐based model

    R. A. Stillman;J. D. Goss‐Custard;A. D. West;S. E. A. Le V. Dit Durell

  • Detection of ecological change using multiple organism groups: metrics and uncertainty

    Richard K. Johnson;Daniel Hering;Mike T. Furse;Ralph T. Clarke

  • Changes on the heathlands in Dorset, England, between 1987 and 1996

    R.J Rose;N.R Webb;R.T Clarke;C.H Traynor

  • Sediment characteristics, invertebrate densities and shorebird densities on the inner banks of the Wash

    M. G. Yates;J. D. Goss-Custard;S. Mcgrorty;K. H. Lakhani

  • Deriving population parameters from individual variations in foraging behaviour. I: Empirical game theory distribution model of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis

    J. D. Goss-Custard;R. W. G. Caldow;R. T. Clarke;S. E. A. Le V. Dit Durell

  • Sampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices

    R. T. Clarke;M. T. Furse;R. J. M. Gunn;J. M. Winder

  • Rates of food intake and aggression of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus on the most and least preferred mussel Mytilus edulis beds of the exe estuary

    J. D. Goss-Custard;R. T. Clarke;S. E. A. le V. dit Durell

Frequent Co-Authors

J. A. Thomas
J. A. Thomas University of Oxford
Graham W. Elmes
Graham W. Elmes Natural Environment Research Council
S. E. A. Le V. Dit Durell
S. E. A. Le V. Dit Durell UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Michael E. Hochberg
Michael E. Hochberg University of Montpellier
Richard A. Stillman
Richard A. Stillman Bournemouth University
Leonard Sandin
Leonard Sandin Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ross A. Hill
Ross A. Hill Bournemouth University
James M. Bullock
James M. Bullock UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Peter Haase
Peter Haase University of Duisburg-Essen
Michael J. Dunbar
Michael J. Dunbar Environment Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often leads to diverse academic and professional opportunities. Many students consider advancing their knowledge through accredited online programs. Top non profit universities offer flexibility and recognized degree options that support work-life balance.

Prospective students with military backgrounds may want to look into military friendly colleges online. These institutions often provide tailored resources, tuition assistance, and support networks to help veterans and active-duty service members succeed.

Ecology and Evolution students interested in applied or people-focused careers may also consider expanding their expertise through graduate studies, such as an online masters of social work. This pathway blends scientific understanding with direct community impact. For those eager to accelerate their studies and move into research or therapy roles, exploring accelerated masters psychology programs can be a smart choice.

With online degrees now more accessible than ever, there are numerous pathways to align your passion for Ecology and Evolution with rewarding career opportunities in science, mental health, or social services.

Best Scientists Citing Ralph T. Clarke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles