World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
41627
World Ranking
7326
National Ranking
3836

Munro Peacock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Munro Peacock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 434 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Munro Peacock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Munro Peacock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Munro Peacock is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and focuses research efforts primarily within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields including Nephrology, Genetics, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

Their main research topics cover Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments, Bone Health and Treatments, Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting, Heterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions, Magnesium in Health and Disease, Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease, as well as Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies.

Recent publications by Munro Peacock include:

  • Phosphate Metabolism in Health and Disease, 2020, Calcified Tissue International
  • Effects of Iron Isomaltoside vs Ferric Carboxymaltose on Hypophosphatemia in Iron-Deficiency Anemia, 2020, JAMA
  • Burosumab for the Treatment of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia, 2020, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • Classical and Nonclassical Manifestations of Primary Hyperparathyroidism, 2020, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • Long-term Burosumab Administration Is Safe and Effective in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia, 2022, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Munro Peacock has collaborated frequently with the following coauthors:

  • Thomas O. Carpenter
  • Thomas J. Weber
  • Karl Insogna
  • Suzanne M. Jan de Beur
  • Paul D. Miller

Their findings have been published most often in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, with additional contributions to the Journal of the Endocrine Society, JAMA, Calcified Tissue International, and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Best Publications

  • Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study

    Thomas J. Wang;Feng Zhang;J. Brent Richards;Bryan Kestenbaum

  • Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density

    Michael R. McClung;E. Michael Lewiecki;Stanley B. Cohen;Michael A. Bolognese

  • A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study

    Charles H Chesnut;Stuart Silverman;Kim Andriano;Harry Genant

  • Calcium supplementation and increases in bone mineral density in children.

    C. Conrad Johnston;Judy Z. Miller;Charles W. Slemenda;Teresa K. Reister

  • Summary statement from a workshop on asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a perspective for the 21st century.

    John P. Bilezikian;John T. Potts;Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan;Michael Kleerekoper

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture

    Karol Estrada;Unnur Styrkarsdottir;Evangelos Evangelou;Yi-Hsiang Hsu

  • Calcium Metabolism in Health and Disease

    Munro Peacock

  • Parent-of-origin-specific allelic associations among 106 genomic loci for age at menarche

    John R.B. Perry;Felix Day;Cathy E. Elks;Patrick Sulem

  • Sex steroids and bone mass in older men. Positive associations with serum estrogens and negative associations with androgens.

    Charles W. Slemenda;Christopher Longcope;Lifen Zhou;Siu L. Hui

  • Genetics of Osteoporosis

    Munro Peacock;Charles H. Turner;Charles H. Turner;Michael J. Econs;Tatiana Foroud

  • Diagnosis of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: proceedings of the third international workshop.

    Richard Eastell;A. Arnold;M. L. Brandi;E. M. Brown

  • Thirty new loci for age at menarche identified by a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies

    Cathy E. Elks;John R B Perry;Patrick Sulem;Daniel I. Chasman

  • Cinacalcet hydrochloride maintains long-term normocalcemia in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

    Munro Peacock;John P. Bilezikian;Preston S. Klassen;Matthew D. Guo

  • Risk factors in calcium stone disease of the urinary tract.

    W. G. Robertson;M. Peacock;P. J. Heyburn;D. H. Marshall

  • Peak bone mass in young women.

    Dorothy Teegarden;William R. Proulx;Berdine R. Martin;Jian Zhao

  • Sex steroids, bone mass, and bone loss. A prospective study of pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women.

    Charles Slemenda;Christopher Longcope;Munro Peacock;Siu Hui

  • Current issues in the presentation of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop.

    Shonni J. Silverberg;Bart L. Clarke;Munro Peacock;Francisco Bandeira

  • Bone mineral density in relation to polymorphism at the vitamin D receptor gene locus.

    Frank G. Hustmyer;Munro Peacock;Siu Hui;C. Conrad Johnston

  • Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women

    G. Liu;M. Peacock;O. Eilam;G. Dorulla

  • Genome-wide Association Study in 79,366 European-ancestry Individuals Informs the Genetic Architecture of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels

    Xia Jiang;Xia Jiang;Paul F. O'Reilly;Hugues Aschard;Hugues Aschard;Yi Hsiang Hsu;Yi Hsiang Hsu

Frequent Co-Authors

Connie M. Weaver
Connie M. Weaver San Diego State University
Daniel L. Koller
Daniel L. Koller Indiana University
Tatiana Foroud
Tatiana Foroud Indiana University
C. Conrad Johnston
C. Conrad Johnston Indiana University
Douglas P. Kiel
Douglas P. Kiel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
David Karasik
David Karasik Bar-Ilan University
Kari Stefansson
Kari Stefansson deCODE Genetics (Iceland)
Tim D. Spector
Tim D. Spector King's College London
Unnur Thorsteinsdottir
Unnur Thorsteinsdottir deCODE Genetics (Iceland)
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of allied online health degrees and career options. For those interested in leadership or hospital administration, accelerated healthcare programs offer a fast track to entering management roles within the healthcare sector.

Nurses looking to advance professionally can benefit from adn to fnp bridge programs. These bridge programs enable registered nurses with an associate degree to become family nurse practitioners with a higher earning potential and more autonomy.

If you have a passion for nutrition and wellness, earning an online dietitian degree can lead to a fulfilling career guiding patients toward healthier lifestyles and preventive care.

For prospective healthcare executives, accredited mha programs offer flexible, reputable online paths for building expertise in health administration.

These diverse online degrees and career pathways expand opportunities for students at different stages in their medical careers, providing flexibility and a pathway to specialized roles within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Munro Peacock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles