World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pavel Shvaiko

Pavel Shvaiko

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
14452
World Ranking
9950
National Ranking
302

Pavel Shvaiko publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pavel Shvaiko sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pavel Shvaiko D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pavel Shvaiko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pavel Shvaiko is affiliated with the University of Trento in Italy. Their academic profile focuses on research activities associated with this institution.

No specific publications, co-authors, or detailed research topics are available to describe their recent scientific contributions.

Information about frequent publication venues, book publications, fields, subfields of study, or main research topics is currently not provided.

No awards or distinctions have been recorded for Pavel Shvaiko in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Ontology Matching

    Jérôme Euzenat;Pavel Shvaiko

  • A survey of schema-based matching approaches

    Pavel Shvaiko;Jérôme Euzenat

  • Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges

    P. Shvaiko;J. Euzenat

  • S-Match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Pavel Shvaiko;Mikalai Yatskevich

  • Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative

    J. Euzenat;M. Mochol;P. Shvaiko;H. Stuckenschmidt

  • Semantic matching

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Pavel Shvaiko

  • Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2009

    Jérôme Euzenat;Alfio Ferrara;Laura Hollink;Antoine Isaac

  • Ten Challenges for Ontology Matching

    Pavel Shvaiko;Jérôme Euzenat

  • Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2007

    Jérôme Euzenat;Antoine Isaac;Christian Meilicke;Pavel Shvaiko

  • Ontology alignment evaluation initiative: six years of experience

    Jérôme Euzenat;Christian Meilicke;Heiner Stuckenschmidt;Pavel Shvaiko

  • Semantic matching: algorithms and implementation

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Mikalai Yatskevich;Pavel Shvaiko

  • Approximate Structure-Preserving Semantic Matching

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Fiona Mcneill;Mikalai Yatskevich;Juan Pane

  • Semantic schema matching

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Pavel Shvaiko;Mikalai Yatskevich

  • Discovering Missing Background Knowledge in Ontology Matching

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Pavel Shvaiko;Mikalai Yatskevich

  • Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2006

    Jérôme Euzenat;Malgorzata Mochol;Pavel Shvaiko;Heiner Stuckenschmidt

  • Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2008

    Caterina Caracciolo;Jérôme Euzenat;Laura Hollink;Ryutaro Ichise

  • Final results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2011

    Jérôme Euzenat;Alfio Ferrara;Willem Robert van Hage;Laura Hollink

  • A geo-service semantic integration in Spatial Data Infrastructures

    Lorenzino Vaccari;Pavel Shvaiko;Maurizio Marchese

  • Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2013

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Zlatan Dragisic;Kai Eckert;Jérôme Euzenat

  • Community-Driven Ontology Matching

    Anna V. Zhdanova;Pavel Shvaiko

  • Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2017

    Manel Achichi;Michelle Cheatham;Zlatan Dragisic;Jerome Euzenat

  • Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2014

    Zlatan Dragisic;Kai Eckert;Jérôme Euzenat;Daniel Faria

Frequent Co-Authors

Jérôme Euzenat
Jérôme Euzenat Grenoble Alpes University
Heiner Stuckenschmidt
Heiner Stuckenschmidt University of Mannheim
Fausto Giunchiglia
Fausto Giunchiglia University of Trento
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz City, University of London
Patrick Lambrix
Patrick Lambrix Linköping University
Heiko Paulheim
Heiko Paulheim University of Mannheim
Isabel F. Cruz
Isabel F. Cruz University of Illinois at Chicago
Natalya F. Noy
Natalya F. Noy Google (United States)
Bernardo Cuenca Grau
Bernardo Cuenca Grau University of Oxford
Deborah L. McGuinness
Deborah L. McGuinness Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to multiple related online degrees and career paths. Many students complement their technical knowledge with business skills by enrolling in online executive mba programs, which can accelerate advancement into tech leadership roles.

If you are interested in information management or digital archives, consider a mlis (Master of Library and Information Science) degree, often available in flexible, online formats.

Cost can be a major concern for many students. To help address this, there are numerous affordable graduate school options in various tech and management fields. These programs balance quality and cost, helping you advance your expertise without excessive student debt.

For those aspiring to senior management or thought leadership, an online doctorate in organizational leadership offers advanced insights into leading technology-driven organizations. Combining technical and leadership degrees can provide a competitive edge in today’s digital economy.

Best Scientists Citing Pavel Shvaiko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles