World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
12186
World Ranking
14365
National Ranking
1128

Rod J. Scott publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod J. Scott sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 119 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Rod J. Scott D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod J. Scott sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rod J. Scott is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on Plant Science and Molecular Biology subfields. The main topics of their work involve Plant Molecular Biology Research, Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism, and Plant Reproductive Biology.

Their recent publications include two papers: "Busted: maternal modifiers of the triploid block involved in seed size control," published in 2024 in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and "Method Validation of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 3 Assay," published in 2025 in The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Ruth Y. Akinmusola, Harvey Kilsby, Catherine-Axa Wilkins, Volkan Çevik, and James Doughty.

The venues where they have published frequently are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine

Their research contributions concentrate on topics such as:

  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Plant Reproductive Biology

Rod J. Scott's work in plant science addresses molecular mechanisms and processes related to plant development and physiology, including seed size determination and enzymatic assay validation relevant to biological and medical laboratory practices.

Best Publications

  • Stamen structure and function

    Rod J Scott;M Spielman;H G Dickinson

  • The AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 gene of Arabidopsis links auxin signalling, cell division, and the size of seeds and other organs

    Marie C. Schruff;Melissa Spielman;Sushma Tiwari;Sally Adams

  • Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Rod J. Scott;Melissa Spielman;John Bailey;Hugh G. Dickinson

  • The staufen/pumilio Pathway Is Involved in Drosophila Long-Term Memory

    Josh Dubnau;Ann-Shyn Chiang;Ann-Shyn Chiang;Lori Grady;Jody Barditch

  • The Arabidopsis MALE STERILITY 2 protein shares similarity with reductases in elongation/condensation complexes

    Mark G.M. Aarts;Rachel Hodge;Kriton Kalantidis;Dion Florack

  • Premature dissolution of the microsporocyte callose wall causes male sterility in transgenic tobacco.

    Dawn Worrall;Diane L. Hird;Rachel Hodge;Wyatt Paul

  • Targeting the CREB pathway for memory enhancers

    Tim Tully;Rusiko Bourtchouladze;Rod Scott;John Tallman

  • EXS, a putative LRR receptor kinase, regulates male germline cell number and tapetal identity and promotes seed development in Arabidopsis.

    Claudia Canales;Anuj M. Bhatt;Rod Scott;Hugh Dickinson

  • Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant crops

    C. Hawes;A. J. Haughton;J. L. Osborne;D. B. Roy

  • An introduction to the Farm-Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops

    L. G. Firbank;M. S. Heard;I. P. Woiwod;C. Hawes

  • Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana require DNA methylation.

    Sally Adams;Rinke Vinkenoog;Melissa Spielman;Hugh G. Dickinson

  • Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity.

    M. S. Heard;C. Hawes;G. T. Champion;S. J. Clark

  • The isolation and characterisation of the tapetum-specific Arabidopsis thaliana A9 gene.

    Wyatt Paul;Rachel Hodge;Sarah Smartt;John Draper

  • Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods.

    A. J. Haughton;G. T. Champion;C. Hawes;M. S. Heard

  • TETRASPORE is required for male meiotic cytokinesis in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Melissa Spielman;Daphne Preuss;Feng Lan Li;William E. Browne

  • Comparative Analysis between Homoeologous Genome Segments of Brassica napus and Its Progenitor Species Reveals Extensive Sequence-Level Divergence

    Foo Cheung;Martin Trick;Nizar Drou;Yong Pyo Lim

  • The molecular biology of anther differentiation

    R. Scott;R. Hodge;W. Paul;J. Draper

  • Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. I. Soil-surface-active invertebrates

    D. R. Brooks;D. A. Bohan;G. T. Champion;A. J. Haughton

  • Low-cost lipid production by an oleaginous yeast cultured in non-sterile conditions using model waste resources

    Fabio Santamauro;Fraeya M Whiffin;Rod J Scott;Christopher J Chuck

  • The basis of natural and artificial postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis species

    Catherine Bushell;Melissa Spielman;Rod J. Scott

Frequent Co-Authors

John Draper
John Draper Aberystwyth University
Hugh G. Dickinson
Hugh G. Dickinson University of Oxford
Gary D. Foster
Gary D. Foster University of Bristol
Rebecca J. Oakey
Rebecca J. Oakey King's College London
Matthew G. Davidson
Matthew G. Davidson University of Bath
Tim Tully
Tim Tully Dart NeuroScience (United States)
Denis J. Murphy
Denis J. Murphy University of South Wales
Luca Comai
Luca Comai University of California, Davis
Andrew H. Paterson
Andrew H. Paterson University of Georgia
Darren J. Martin
Darren J. Martin University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Rod J. Scott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles