World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roberto Segala

Roberto Segala

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6906
World Ranking
10616
National Ranking
328

Roberto Segala publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Segala sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 83 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Roberto Segala D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Segala sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roberto Segala is affiliated with the University of Verona in Italy. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Computer Science and includes focused work in Computational Theory and Mathematics as well as Hardware and Architecture.

The main topics of Roberto Segala's work include:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques

Recent scholarly contributions include the paper titled "A computable and compositional semantics for hybrid systems", published in 2024 in the journal Information and Computation. This paper highlights Segala's engagement with formal semantics within hybrid systems.

Roberto Segala frequently collaborates with multiple co-authors in their research projects. These include:

  • Davide Bresolin
  • Pieter Collins
  • Luca Geretti
  • Tiziano Villa
  • Sanja Živanović Gonzalez

The preferred venue for publication, based on available data, is Information and Computation, where Segala has at least one published work. This suggests a consistent focus on outlets that prioritize computational theory and related disciplines.

Roberto Segala's research trajectory indicates a strong intersection of theoretical computer science elements with practical approaches to system modeling and embedded system design. The blend of formal methods and Petri nets points to an interest in rigorous system verification and modeling techniques that contribute to understanding and developing embedded systems and hybrid computational frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Modeling and verification of randomized distributed real-time systems

    Roberto Segala

  • Probabilistic simulations for probabilistic processes

    Roberto Segala;Nancy Lynch

  • Hybrid I/O automata

    Nancy Lynch;Roberto Segala;Frits Vaandrager

  • Automatic verification of real-time systems with discrete probability distributions

    Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;Roberto Segala;Jeremy Sproston

  • Probabilistic Simulations for Probabilistic Processes

    Roberto Segala;Nancy A. Lynch

  • Hybrid I/O automata

    Nancy Lynch;Roberto Segala;Frits Vaandrager;H. B. Weinberg

  • The Theory of Timed I/O Automata

    Dilsun Kirli Kaynar;Nancy A. Lynch;Roberto Segala;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • Symbolic Model Checking of Probabilistic Processes Using MTBDDs and the Kronecker Representation

    Luca de Alfaro;Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Timed I/O automata: a mathematical framework for modeling and analyzing real-time systems

    D.K. Kaynar;N. Lynch;R. Segala;F. Vaandrager

  • A Compositional Trace-Based Semantics for Probabilistic Automata

    Roberto Segala

  • Liveness in Timed and Untimed Systems

    Rainer Gawlick;Roberto Segala;Jørgen F. Søgaard-Andersen;Jørgen F. Søgaard-Andersen;Nancy A. Lynch

  • Hybrid I/O Automata Revisited

    Nancy A. Lynch;Roberto Segala;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • Decision Algorithms for Probabilistic Bisimulation

    Stefano Cattani;Roberto Segala

  • Verifying Quantitative Properties of Continuous Probabilistic Timed Automata

    Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;Roberto Segala;Jeremy Sproston

  • Time Optimal Self-Stabilizing Spanning Tree Algorithms

    Sudhanshu Aggarwal;Sudhanshu Aggarwal;Shay Kutten

  • The Theory of Timed I/O Automata (Synthesis Lectures in Computer Science)

    Dilsun K. Kaynar;Nancy Lynch;Roberto Segala;Frits Vaandrager

  • Automated Verification of a Randomized Distributed Consensus Protocol Using Cadence SMV and PRISM

    Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;Roberto Segala

  • Axiomatizations for Probabilistic Bisimulation

    Emanuele Bandini;Roberto Segala

  • Testing Probabilistic Automata

    Roberto Segala

  • Observing Branching Structure through Probabilistic Contexts

    Nancy Lynch;Roberto Segala;Frits Vaandrager

  • Hybrid I/O automata

    N. Lynch;R. Segala;F.W. Vaandrager;H.B. Weinberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Frits W. Vaandrager
Frits W. Vaandrager Radboud University
Gethin Norman
Gethin Norman University of Glasgow
Marta Kwiatkowska
Marta Kwiatkowska University of Oxford
Ran Canetti
Ran Canetti Boston University
Holger Hermanns
Holger Hermanns Saarland University
David Parker
David Parker University of Oxford
Shlomi Dolev
Shlomi Dolev Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Catherine Meadows
Catherine Meadows United States Naval Research Laboratory
Alberto Montresor
Alberto Montresor University of Trento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career options. Many students opt for flexible and budget-friendly alternatives. For those starting out, a cheapest bachelor's degree online can be an excellent entry point, helping students manage costs while building a solid academic foundation.

If you're interested in technical fields that overlap with computer science, consider pursuing an engineering degree online. These degrees often include shared coursework and can broaden your skill set for roles in both industries.

For professionals looking to advance into leadership, online emba programs offer tailored business and management training. This pathway is ideal for those aiming to move into tech management or executive roles.

Finally, those drawn to information, data, or digital resource management may be interested in the online mlis programs. These degrees equip graduates for technology-driven positions in libraries, archives, and information centers.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Segala

Trending Scientists