World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7287
World Ranking
11086
National Ranking
4604

Rob van Glabbeek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rob van Glabbeek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rob van Glabbeek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rob van Glabbeek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics

    Rob J. van Glabbeek;W. Peter Weijland

  • The Linear Time - Branching Time Spectrum II

    Rob J. van Glabbeek

  • Petri net models for algebraic theories of concurrency

    Rob J. van Glabbeek;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • The Linear Time - Branching Time Spectrum I.

    Rob J. van Glabbeek

  • The Linear Time-Branching Time Spectrum (Extended Abstract)

    Rob J. van Glabbeek

  • Equivalence notions for concurrent systems and refinement of actions

    Rob van Glabbeek;Ursula Goltz

  • Refinement of actions and equivalence notions for concurrent systems

    Rob van Glabbeek;Ursula Goltz

  • Branching Time and Abstraction in Bisimulation Semantics (Extended Abstract).

    Rob J. van Glabbeek;W. P. Weijland

  • Proof nets for unit-free multiplicative-additive linear logic

    Dominic J. D. Hughes;Rob J. Van Glabbeek

  • Bounded nondeterminism and the approximation induction principle in process algebra

    Rob J. van Glabbeek

  • Method and apparatus for permissions based active document workflow

    David G. Stork;Robert Jan van Glabbeek;Stephen Savitzky

  • Characterising Testing Preorders for Finite Probabilistic Processes

    Yuxin Deng;Robert van Glabbeek;Matthew Hennessy;Carroll Morgan

  • Ntyft/ntyxt Rules Reduce to Ntree Rules

    Wan Fokkink;Rob van Glabbeek

  • A Complete Axiomatization for Branching Bisimulation Congruence of Finite-State Behaviours

    Rob J. van Glabbeek

  • A process algebra for wireless mesh networks

    Ansgar Fehnker;Rob van Glabbeek;Peter Höfner;Annabelle McIver

  • Automated analysis of AODV using UPPAAL

    Ansgar Fehnker;Rob van Glabbeek;Peter Höfner;Annabelle McIver

  • Branching Bisimilarity with Explicit Divergence

    Rob van Glabbeek;Bas Luttik;Nikola Trčka

  • Equivalence Notions for Concurrent Systems and Refinement of Actions (Extended Abstract)

    Rob J. van Glabbeek;Ursula Goltz

  • Testing Finitary Probabilistic Processes

    Yuxin Deng;Rob Glabbeek;Matthew Hennessy;Carroll Morgan

  • Characterising Testing Preorders for Finite Probabilistic Processes

    Yuxin Deng;Matthew Hennessy;Rob van Glabbeek;Carroll Morgan

Frequent Co-Authors

Wan Fokkink
Wan Fokkink Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Annabelle McIver
Annabelle McIver Macquarie University
Matthew Hennessy
Matthew Hennessy Trinity College Dublin
Carroll Morgan
Carroll Morgan University of New South Wales
Frits W. Vaandrager
Frits W. Vaandrager Radboud University
David G. Stork
David G. Stork Stanford University
Gordon Plotkin
Gordon Plotkin University of Edinburgh
Jan Friso Groote
Jan Friso Groote Eindhoven University of Technology
Roberto Gorrieri
Roberto Gorrieri University of Bologna
Catuscia Palamidessi
Catuscia Palamidessi French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens up multiple online learning and career options. For those interested in deeper scientific theory, an online theoretical physics degree is a flexible way to gain advanced scientific training without relocating, often at an affordable cost.

Data-driven careers continue to grow, making the cheapest master in data science programs very attractive. Many top universities offer online options that build expertise in machine learning and analytics.

Alternatively, students keen on technology and hardware can choose programs from the top online electrical engineering schools. These programs balance theory with real-world skills that are highly valued across industries.

If you’re looking for a quicker entry into the workforce, consider short certificate programs that pay well. These credentials can lead to high-demand jobs in less time, offering flexibility for both students and working professionals.

Whether you’re pursuing a full degree or a targeted certification, these online options help expand career pathways in tech and science.

Best Scientists Citing Rob van Glabbeek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles