World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5170
World Ranking
13057
National Ranking
252

Wan Fokkink publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wan Fokkink sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 270 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Wan Fokkink D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wan Fokkink sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wan Fokkink is a researcher affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their work primarily focuses on computer science, with a significant emphasis on computational theory and mathematics.

The research topics covered by Wan Fokkink include:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling
  • Semigroups and Automata Theory
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Real-Time Systems Scheduling
  • Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems

Wan Fokkink has contributed to the academic community through numerous publications in well-known venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IFAC-PapersOnLine
  • Control Engineering Practice
  • Discrete Event Dynamic Systems
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Wan Fokkink are:

  • Variations on Itai-Rodeh Leader Election for Anonymous Rings and their Analysis in PRISM, 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Supervisor Synthesis: Bridging Theory and Practice, 2022, Computer

Wan Fokkink also co-authored works such as Synthesized fault-tolerant supervisory controllers, with an application to a rotating bridge, 2021, Computers in Industry; Model properties for efficient synthesis of nonblocking modular supervisors, 2021, Control Engineering Practice; and Compositional coordinator synthesis of extended finite automata, 2021, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems.

The scientist collaborates frequently with several colleagues in their field, with notable co-authors including:

  • J.M. van de Mortel-Fronczak
  • Jacobus E. Rooda
  • Martijn A. Goorden
  • Michel Reniers
  • L. Moormann

Best Publications

  • Introduction to Process Algebra

    Wan Fokkink

  • Structural Operational Semantics

    Luca Aceto;Willem Jan Fokkink;Chris Verhoef

  • µCRL: A Toolset for Analysing Algebraic Specifications

    Stefan Blom;Wan Fokkink;Jan Friso Groote;Izak van Langevelde

  • CIF 3 : model-based engineering of supervisory controllers

    van Da Bert Beek;WJ Wan Fokkink;Dennis D Hendriks;AT Albert Hofkamp

  • Distributed Algorithms: An Intuitive Approach

    Wan Fokkink

  • Ntyft/ntyxt Rules Reduce to Ntree Rules

    Wan Fokkink;Rob van Glabbeek

  • Basic process algebra with iteration: completeness of its equational axioms.

    Wan J. Fokkink;Hans Zantema

  • Modelling Distributed Systems

    Wan Fokkink

  • Split-2 bisimilarity has a finite axiomatization over CCS with Hennessy's merge

    L Aceto;WJ Wan Fokkink;A Ingólfsdóttir;SP Bas Luttik

  • Precongruence formats for decorated trace semantics

    Bard Bloom;Wan Fokkink;Rob J. van Glabbeek

  • Some Trends in Formal Methods Applications to Railway Signaling

    Alessandro Fantechi;Wan Fokkink;Angelo Morzenti

  • Mean-Field Analysis for the Evaluation of Gossip Protocols

    Rena Bakhshi;Lucia Cloth;Wan Fokkink;Boudewijn Haverkort

  • A conservative look at operational semantics with variable binding

    Wan Fokkink;Chris Verhoef

  • Executing multicellular differentiation

    Nicola Bonzanni;Elzbieta Krepska;K. Anton Feenstra;Wan Fokkink

  • Compositionality of Hennessy-Milner logic by structural operational semantics

    Wan Fokkink;Rob van Glabbeek;Paulien de Wind

  • Restricted Broadcast Process Theory

    F. Ghassemi;W. Fokkink;A. Movaghar

  • MeanField analysis for the evaluation of gossip protocols

    Rena Bakhshi;Lucia Cloth;Wan Fokkink;Boudewijn R. Haverkort

  • Rooted Branching Bisimulation as a Congruence

    Wan Fokkink

  • Analyzing a Chi model of a turntable system using Spin, CADP and Uppaal

    Elena M. Bortnik;Nikola Trcka;Anton Wijs;Bas Luttik

  • Axiomatizing Prefix Iteration with Silent Steps

    Luca Aceto;Rob van Glabbeek;Wan Fokkink;Anna Ingólfsdóttir

Frequent Co-Authors

Luca Aceto
Luca Aceto Reykjavík University
Rob van Glabbeek
Rob van Glabbeek Stanford University
Taolue Chen
Taolue Chen Birkbeck, University of London
Jan Friso Groote
Jan Friso Groote Eindhoven University of Technology
Henri E. Bal
Henri E. Bal Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ali Movaghar
Ali Movaghar Sharif University of Technology
Chris Verhoef
Chris Verhoef Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Guus Schreiber
Guus Schreiber Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jan A. Bergstra
Jan A. Bergstra University of Amsterdam
Jaap Heringa
Jaap Heringa Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related fields and flexible study options. Many students are now considering cost-effective online programs in areas such as engineering, data science, and physics. Affordable online degrees can make it easier to develop in-demand skills while balancing work or other commitments.

If you’re interested in building a foundation in engineering, check out the online mechanical engineering degree guide. Similarly, students drawn to fundamental science can find more options with the online physics degree programs offered by various U.S. institutions.

For those looking at technology and analytics careers, you may wonder, what is the cheapest data science course in the us? There are several affordable choices for data science degrees online that can help jumpstart your career. Electrical engineering is another versatile pathway, so be sure to compare electrical engineering online tuition costs when researching your options.

These pathways not only expand your knowledge but also increase your career flexibility within the ever-evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Wan Fokkink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles