World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
4972
World Ranking
10377
National Ranking
187

Chris Verhoef publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Verhoef sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Chris Verhoef D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Verhoef sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chris Verhoef is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields within computer science and engineering.

The scientist's main field of study is Computer Science, with notable work across subfields such as Information Systems, Software, Computer Science Applications, Materials Chemistry, and Energy Engineering and Power Technology.

The key research topics associated with Verhoef include:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Recent publications by Chris Verhoef highlight a diverse range of interests and collaboration across disciplines. These works include:

  • "Cost-driven software migration: An experience report," 2020, Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • "Beyond Hydrolysis: Scalable, On-Demand Dihydrogen Release from NaBH4 Enables Circular and Sustainable Process Design," 2024, Sustainability & Circularity NOW
  • "Who's that lady? - Applying open source intelligence in a history context," 2024, Endeavour

Frequent publication venues in which Verhoef's research appears include:

  • Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • Sustainability & Circularity NOW
  • Endeavour

The scientist has collaborated with several notable coauthors, including:

  • Harry M. Sneed
  • Peter Wessels
  • F. Buss
  • V. Yu. Geiger
  • Bas de Jong

Best Publications

  • Structural Operational Semantics

    Luca Aceto;Willem Jan Fokkink;Chris Verhoef

  • Toward an engineering discipline for grammarware

    Paul Klint;Ralf Lämmel;Chris Verhoef

  • The rise and fall of the Chaos report figures

    J.L. Eveleens;C. Verhoef

  • Semi-automatic grammar recovery

    R. Lämmel;C. Verhoef

  • A congruence theorem for structured operational semantics with predicates and negative premises

    Chris Verhoef

  • Quatitative IT portolio management

    C. Verhoef

  • Current parsing techniques in software renovation considered harmful

    M. van den Brand;A. Sellink;C. Verhoef

  • Generation of components for software renovation factories from context-free grammars

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Alex Sellink;Chris Verhoef

  • Cracking the 500-language problem

    R. Lammel;C. Verhoef

  • A Congruence Theorem for Structured Operational Semantics with Predicates

    Jos C. M. Baeten;Chris Verhoef

  • The realities of language conversions

    A.A. Terekhov;C. Verhoef

  • Concrete process algebra

    J. C. M. Baeten;C. Verhoef

  • Software product line migration and deployment

    D. Faust;Chris Verhoef

  • Architecture Reconstruction Guidelines

    Rick Kazman;Liam O'Brien;Chris Verhoef

  • Restructuring of COBOL/CICS legacy systems

    A. Sellink;H. Sneed;C. Verhoef

  • Quantifying the value of IT-investments

    C. Verhoef

  • Generation of components for software renovation factories from context-free grammars

    M. van den Brand;A. Sellink;C. Verhoef

  • Software Architecture Reconstruction: Practice Needs and Current Approaches

    Liam O'Brien;Christoph Stoermer;Chris Verhoef

  • Obtaining a COBOL grammar from legacy code for reengineering purposes

    M. G. J. Van Den Brand;M. P. A. Sellink;C. Verhoef

  • A conservative look at operational semantics with variable binding

    Wan Fokkink;Chris Verhoef

  • A two-phase process for software architecture improvement

    R. Krikhaar;A. Postma;A. Sellink;M. Stroucken

  • Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering

    J. Ebert;C. Verhoef

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Klint
Paul Klint Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Wan Fokkink
Wan Fokkink Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ralf Lämmel
Ralf Lämmel Facebook (United States)
Luca Aceto
Luca Aceto Reykjavík University
Mark van den Brand
Mark van den Brand Eindhoven University of Technology
Rick Kazman
Rick Kazman University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jan Friso Groote
Jan Friso Groote Eindhoven University of Technology
Anthony Rowe
Anthony Rowe Carnegie Mellon University
Tom Mens
Tom Mens University of Mons
Arie van Deursen
Arie van Deursen Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science often opens doors to related fields and diverse career pathways—many of which can be pursued fully online. From data science and electrical engineering to fast-tracked certifications, students have a range of options to boost their credentials and job prospects.

When cost is a concern, consider what is the cheapest data science course in the US? Pursuing affordable programs can ease financial pressures while still delivering a quality education.

For those interested in hardware, energy systems, or automation, online electrical engineering degrees are gaining traction. Curious about their value? Review insights on online electrical engineering career outcomes to weigh your options.

If you’re looking to quickly add marketable skills, check out quick certifications that pay well. These can often be completed in a matter of months and may lead to lucrative new opportunities.

For those considering an advanced degree but short on time, explore the shortest master degree programs. Accelerated online master’s programs can help you upskill and move forward in your career faster than traditional routes.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Verhoef

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles