World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6957
World Ranking
10148
National Ranking
183

Mark van den Brand publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark van den Brand sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 320 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark van den Brand D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark van den Brand sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark van den Brand is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans several domains within computer science and engineering, with a focus on software and system modeling, digital transformation, and model-driven engineering.

The scientific fields covered by their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

The subfields of study relevant to their research are:

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Major topics addressed in their publications consist of:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques

Frequent co-authors collaborating on publications with Mark van den Brand include:

  • Önder Babur
  • Loek Cleophas
  • Francis Bordeleau
  • Benoît Combemale
  • Manuel Wimmer

Their work has been published primarily in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • IEEE Software
  • Empirical Software Engineering

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark van den Brand include:

  • "Current trends in digital twin development, maintenance, and operation: an interview study," 2024, Software & Systems Modeling
  • "Clone-Seeker: Effective Code Clone Search Using Annotations," 2022, IEEE Access
  • "Conceptualizing Digital Twins," 2021, IEEE Software
  • "Models Meet Data: Challenges to Create Virtual Entities for Digital Twins," 2021, 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • "A systematic literature review of cross-domain model consistency checking by model management tools," 2020, Software & Systems Modeling

Best Publications

  • The ASF+SDF Meta-environment: A Component-Based Language Development Environment

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Arie van Deursen;Jan Heering;H. A. de Jong

  • The Asf+Sdf Meta-Environment: A Component-Based Language Development Environment

    M.G.J. van den Brand;A. van Deursen;J. Heering;H.A. de Jong

  • Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams

    Bogdan Vasilescu;Daryl Posnett;Baishakhi Ray;Mark G.J. van den Brand

  • Efficient annotated terms

    M. G. T. Van den Brand;H. A. de Jong;P. Klint;P. A. Olivier

  • Compiling language definitions: the ASF+SDF compiler

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;J. Heering;P. Klint;P. A. Olivier

  • Disambiguation Filters for Scannerless Generalized LR Parsers

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Jeroen Scheerder;Jurgen J. Vinju;Eelco Visser

  • Generation of formatters for context-free languages

    Mark van den Brand;Eelco Visser

  • Process Mining Software Repositories

    Wouter Poncin;Alexander Serebrenik;Mark van den Brand

  • Current parsing techniques in software renovation considered harmful

    M. van den Brand;A. Sellink;C. Verhoef

  • Generation of components for software renovation factories from context-free grammars

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Alex Sellink;Chris Verhoef

  • Term rewriting with traversal functions

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Paul Klint;Jurgen J. Vinju

  • Disambiguation filters for scannerless generalized LR parsers

    M.G.J. van den Brand;J. Scheerder;J.J. Vinju;Eelco Visser

  • Continuous Integration in a Social-Coding World: Empirical Evidence from GitHub

    Bogdan Vasilescu;Stef van Schuylenburg;Jules Wulms;Alexander Serebrenik

  • Conceptualizing Digital Twins

    Romina Eramo;Francis Bordeleau;Benoit Combemale;Mark van den Brand

  • Industrial Applications of ASF+SDF

    Mark G. J. van den Brand;Arie van Deursen;Paul Klint;Paul Klint;Steven Klusener

  • Who's who in Gnome: Using LSA to merge software repository identities

    Erik Kouters;Bogdan Vasilescu;Alexander Serebrenik;Mark G. J. van den Brand

  • Eclipse API usage: the good and the bad

    John Businge;Alexander Serebrenik;Mark G. Brand

  • Theil index for aggregation of software metrics values

    Alexander Serebrenik;Mark van den Brand

  • Towards Model-Driven Digital Twin Engineering: Current Opportunities and Future Challenges

    Francis Bordeleau;Benoit Combemale;Romina Eramo;Mark van den Brand

  • Generation of components for software renovation factories from context-free grammars

    M. van den Brand;A. Sellink;C. Verhoef

  • You can't control the unfamiliar: A study on the relations between aggregation techniques for software metrics

    Bogdan Vasilescu;Alexander Serebrenik;Mark van den Brand

  • Obtaining a COBOL grammar from legacy code for reengineering purposes

    M. G. J. Van Den Brand;M. P. A. Sellink;C. Verhoef

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Serebrenik
Alexander Serebrenik Eindhoven University of Technology
Paul Klint
Paul Klint Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Bogdan Vasilescu
Bogdan Vasilescu Carnegie Mellon University
Eelco Visser
Eelco Visser Delft University of Technology
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Bart Jacobs
Bart Jacobs Radboud University
Manuel Wimmer
Manuel Wimmer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Chris Verhoef
Chris Verhoef Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jeff Gray
Jeff Gray University of Alabama
Dragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options can help students advance their careers in computer science quickly and affordably. Many learners choose the quickest online masters degree programs to gain specialized knowledge and enter the workforce faster.

It is also important to select programs that align with job market needs. Understanding which master's degree is most in demand in usa can help guide your decision and maximize your employment prospects.

For those looking to start their education journey or change careers, enrolling in an online associate degree offers flexibility and foundational skills that can lead to further study or entry-level tech positions.

Budget-conscious students may also benefit from cheap online college classes that offer quality learning without the high costs.

Best Scientists Citing Mark van den Brand

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles