World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 7028 6754 2506 2331 183 8258

Mazdak Arabi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mazdak Arabi between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mazdak Arabi published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2018. 13 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2018. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 2 publications
2004 2026

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mazdak Arabi: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 4
2006 6
2007 6
2008 7
2009 5
2010 3
2011 10
2012 13
2013 9
2014 21
2015 17
2016 10
2017 12
2018 24
2019 7
2020 13
2021 15
2022 7
2023 7
2024 11
2025 11
2026 2
Total 222
Download as CSV

Mazdak Arabi publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mazdak Arabi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 183 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400 183
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mazdak Arabi D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mazdak Arabi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Mazdak Arabi is a researcher affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their work primarily falls under the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Ocean Engineering, and Atmospheric Science.

Their research addresses multiple key topics within these fields, which include:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Climate variability and models
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies

Mazdak Arabi has published extensively in a variety of academic venues. The most frequent journals and platforms where their work appears are:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Earth's Future
  • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
  • Water

They have also collaborated with several recurring coauthors throughout their career. The most frequent collaborators include:

  • Travis Warziniack
  • Sybil Sharvelle
  • Mahshid Ghanbari
  • Hadi Heidari
  • Tyler Dell

Among their recent published papers are the following works:

  • "Climate Change and Changes in Compound Coastal-Riverine Flooding Hazard Along the U.S. Coasts," 2021, Earth's Future
  • "Effects of Urban Development Patterns on Municipal Water Shortage," 2021, Frontiers in Water
  • "The role of climate change and urban development on compound dry-hot extremes across US cities," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Toward impact-based monitoring of drought and its cascading hazards," 2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • "Assessing Shifts in Regional Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. River Basins in Response to Climate Change over the 21st Century," 2020, Earth's Future

Best Publications

  • Correlation Between Upstream Human Activities and Riverine Antibiotic Resistance Genes

    Amy Pruden;Amy Pruden;Mazdak Arabi;Heather N. Storteboom

  • Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT

    Mazdak Arabi;Jane R. Frankenberger;Bernie A. Engel;Jeff G. Arnold

  • Modeling long-term water quality impact of structural BMPs

    K. S. Bracmort;M. Arabi;J. R. Frankenberger;B. A. Engel

  • Uncertainty in Flood Inundation Mapping: Current Issues and Future Directions

    Venkatesh Merwade;Francisco Olivera;Mazdak Arabi;Scott Edleman

  • Assessing regional‐scale spatio‐temporal patterns of groundwater–surface water interactions using a coupled SWAT‐MODFLOW model

    Ryan T. Bailey;Tyler C. Wible;Mazdak Arabi;Rosemary M. Records

  • A Hydrologic/Water Quality Model Applicati1

    Bernard Engel;Dan Storm;Mike White;Jeff Arnold

  • Cost‐effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm

    Mazdak Arabi;Rao S. Govindaraju;Mohamed M. Hantush

  • Tracking Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the South Platte River Basin Using Molecular Signatures of Urban, Agricultural, And Pristine Sources

    Heather Storteboom;Mazdak Arabi;Jessica G. Davis;Barbara Crimi

  • A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices

    Mazdak Arabi;Rao S. Govindaraju;Mohamed M. Hantush

  • UNCERTAINTY IN TMDL MODELS

    A. Shirmohammadi;I. Chaubey;R. D. Harmel;D. D. Bosch

  • Role of Watershed Subdivision on Modeling the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices With Swat

    Mazdak Arabi;Rao S. Govindaraju;Mohamed M. Hantush;Bernard A. Engel

  • Hydrological Processes and Model Representation: Impact of Soft Data on Calibration

    J.G. Arnold;Youssef;H. Yen;M.J. White

  • Identification of Antibiotic-Resistance-Gene Molecular Signatures Suitable as Tracers of Pristine River, Urban, and Agricultural Sources

    H. Storteboom;M. Arabi;J. G. Davis;B. Crimi

  • A framework for propagation of uncertainty contributed by parameterization, input data, model structure, and calibration/validation data in watershed modeling

    Haw Yen;Xiuying Wang;Darrell G. Fontane;R. Daren Harmel

  • Application of a Multi-Objective Optimization Method to Provide Least Cost Alternatives for NPS Pollution Control

    Chetan Maringanti;Indrajeet Chaubey;Mazdak Arabi;Bernard Engel

  • Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a dynamic agroecosystem model under different irrigation treatments

    Kendall C. DeJonge;James C. Ascough;Mehdi Ahmadi;Allan A. Andales

  • Climate Change and Changes in Compound Coastal-Riverine Flooding Hazard Along the U.S. Coasts

    Mahshid Ghanbari;Mazdak Arabi;Shih-Chieh Kao;Jayantha Obeysekera

  • Improving conservation practices programming to protect water quality in agricultural watersheds: Lessons learned from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture-Conservation Effects Assessment Project

    Deanna Osmond;Don Meals;Dana Hoag;Mazdak Arabi

  • Coupled SWAT-MODFLOW model for large-scale mixed agro-urban river basins

    Fatemeh Aliyari;Ryan T. Bailey;Ali Tasdighi;André Dozier

  • Improving evapotranspiration simulations in the CERES-Maize model under limited irrigation

    K.C. DeJonge;J.C. Ascough;A.A. Andales;N.C. Hansen

  • Introduction to Hydrology

    Jose D. Salas;Rao S. Govindaraju;Michael Anderson;Mazdak Arabi

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard A. Engel
Bernard A. Engel Purdue University West Lafayette
Rao S. Govindaraju
Rao S. Govindaraju Purdue University West Lafayette
Ryan T. Bailey
Ryan T. Bailey Colorado State University
Timothy R. Green
Timothy R. Green Agricultural Research Service
Amy Pruden
Amy Pruden Virginia Tech
Indrajeet Chaubey
Indrajeet Chaubey University of Connecticut
Jeffrey G. Arnold
Jeffrey G. Arnold Agricultural Research Service
Jane Frankenberger
Jane Frankenberger Purdue University West Lafayette
Martyn P. Clark
Martyn P. Clark University of Saskatchewan
Dmitri Kavetski
Dmitri Kavetski University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens diverse career pathways, and many students now seek flexible online options to advance their education. For educators looking to transition from a master's to a doctorate, eds to edd bridge programs online provide an ideal solution. These programs combine convenience with rigorous training, preparing graduates for leadership roles in environmental education and policy development.

Social workers specializing in environmental justice or community resilience may consider affordable advanced degrees like dsw programs. These online doctorates equip professionals with the skills to create impactful social change, especially in vulnerable populations affected by environmental issues.

For students interested in a broader academic foundation, cheapest online general studies degree programs offer cost-effective ways to gain essential skills while exploring various disciplines connected to environmental science, such as policy, economics, and communication.

Those just starting their academic journey might find it useful to consider what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get, balancing their interests with manageable coursework. Understanding these options helps prospective students design a path that suits their career goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Mazdak Arabi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles