World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Holger Hermanns

Holger Hermanns

Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
14987
World Ranking
3072
National Ranking
147

Holger Hermanns publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger Hermanns sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 330 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Holger Hermanns D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger Hermanns sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2013 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Holger Hermanns is affiliated with Saarland University in Germany and has a substantial body of work spanning the fields of computer science and engineering. Their research focuses predominantly on formal methods in verification, software testing and debugging techniques, as well as adversarial robustness in machine learning. Other notable topics include satellite communication systems, software reliability and analysis research, ethics and social impacts of artificial intelligence, and advanced software engineering methodologies.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? - A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research, 2021, Artificial Intelligence
  • Model Checking Algorithms for Markov Automata, 2024, Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek
  • Managing Fleets of LEO Satellites: Nonlinear, Optimal, Efficient, Scalable, Usable, and Robust, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • Conformance Relations and Hyperproperties for Doping Detection in Time and Space, 2022, Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • A Modest Approach to Markov Automata, 2021, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Michaela Klauck
  • Maximilian A. Köhl
  • Jörg Hoffmann
  • Sebastian Biewer
  • Marcel Steinmetz

Hermanns has contributed publications to various venues, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • Artificial Intelligence

Their publications also include books published by Springer Science+Business Media, such as "Dependable Software Engineering. Theories, Tools, and Applications" (2023) and "Measurement, Modelling and Evaluation of Computing Systems" (2020).

Main fields of study where Hermanns has made contributions are:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Subfields of particular interest include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Software
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Recognized for their academic contributions, Holger Hermanns has been a member of Academia Europaea since 2013.

Best Publications

  • Model-checking algorithms for continuous-time Markov chains

    C. Baier;B. Haverkort;H. Hermanns;J.-P. Katoen

  • The ins and outs of the probabilistic model checker MRMC

    Joost-Pieter Katoen;Ivan S. Zapreev;Ernst Moritz Hahn;Holger Hermanns

  • What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? – A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research

    Markus Langer;Daniel Oster;Timo Speith;Holger Hermanns

  • Interactive Markov chains: and the quest for quantified quality

    Holger Hermanns

  • Validation of Stochastic Systems : A Guide to Current Research

    Christel Baier;Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Joost-Pieter Katoen;Holger Hermanns

  • Interactive Markov Chains

    Holger Hermanns

  • Approximative Symbolic Model Checking of Continuous-Time Markov Chains

    Christel Baier;Joost-Pieter Katoen;Joost-Pieter Katoen;Holger Hermanns

  • Process algebra for performance evaluation

    Holger Hermanns;Ulrich Herzog;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • Approximate symbolic model checking of continuous-time Markov chains

    C. Baier;J.-P. Katoen;H. Hermanns

  • Optimal state-space lumping in Markov chains

    Salem Derisavi;Holger Hermanns;William H. Sanders

  • Model Checking Continuous-Time Markov Chains by Transient Analysis

    Christel Baier;Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Holger Hermanns;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • Probabilistic CEGAR

    Holger Hermanns;Björn Wachter;Lijun Zhang

  • Comparative branching-time semantics for Markov chains

    Christel Baier;Joost-Pieter Katoen;Holger Hermanns;Verena Wolf

  • Probabilistic reachability for parametric Markov models

    Ernst Moritz Hahn;Holger Hermanns;Lijun Zhang

  • MODEST: A Compositional Modeling Formalism for Hard and Softly Timed Systems

    H. Bohnenkamp;P.R. D'Argenio;H. Hermanns;J.-P. Katoen

  • On Probabilistic Automata in Continuous Time

    Christian Eisentraut;Holger Hermanns;Lijun Zhang

  • Weak Bisimulation for Fully Probabilistic Processes

    Christel Baier;Holger Hermanns

  • Discrete-Time Rewards Model-Checked

    Suzana Andova;Holger Hermanns;Holger Hermanns;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • Concur 2006 - Concurrency Theory

    Christel Baier;Holger Hermanns

  • The Modest Toolset: An Integrated Environment for Quantitative Modelling and Verification

    Arnd Hartmanns;Holger Hermanns

  • A Probabilistic Extension of UML Statecharts

    David N. Jansen;Holger Hermanns;Joost-Pieter Katoen

Frequent Co-Authors

Joost-Pieter Katoen
Joost-Pieter Katoen RWTH Aachen University
Christel Baier
Christel Baier TU Dresden
Boudewijn R. Haverkort
Boudewijn R. Haverkort Tilburg University
Bernd Becker
Bernd Becker University of Freiburg
Kim Guldstrand Larsen
Kim Guldstrand Larsen Aalborg University
Jane Hillston
Jane Hillston University of Edinburgh
Jörg Hoffmann
Jörg Hoffmann Saarland University
Flemming Nielson
Flemming Nielson Technical University of Denmark
Roberto Segala
Roberto Segala University of Verona
Peter Buchholz
Peter Buchholz TU Dortmund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right pathway in computer science often depends on your career goals, budget, and timeline. For those seeking rapid entry into the workforce, exploring the fastest degree to get can help you identify programs that offer great salaries without several years of study.

If you're passionate about advanced technologies, pursuing the best online masters in AI could open doors in high-demand fields such as data science, robotics, and machine learning. These online options provide flexibility while allowing you to stay ahead in a tech-driven job market.

Not sure what to specialize in? Review the best majors for the future to ensure your studies align with emerging trends and long-term career stability. Alternatively, if you want to boost your credentials without an overwhelming workload, consider the easiest online masters degree options.

No matter your choice, online degrees in computer science offer a flexible and strategic way to advance your career.

Best Scientists Citing Holger Hermanns

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles