World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Boudewijn R. Haverkort

Boudewijn R. Haverkort

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7666
World Ranking
9230
National Ranking
164

Boudewijn R. Haverkort publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boudewijn R. Haverkort sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 318 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Boudewijn R. Haverkort D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boudewijn R. Haverkort sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to performance and dependability evaluation of computer and communication systems

Overview

Boudewijn R. Haverkort is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Engineering and Computer Science. The scientist's work spans various subfields including Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Hardware and Architecture, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Real-Time Systems Scheduling
  • Technology Assessment and Management
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Boudewijn R. Haverkort include:

  • Current trends in digital twin development, maintenance, and operation: an interview study, 2024, Software & Systems Modeling
  • Models Meet Data: Challenges to Create Virtual Entities for Digital Twins, 2021, 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)
  • Minimizing the Maximum Processor Temperature by Temperature-Aware Scheduling of Real-Time Tasks, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
  • Machine Learning Data Center Workloads Using Generative Adversarial Networks, 2020, ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
  • The practicalities of a partial lottery to allocate research funding, 2024, Research Evaluation

Frequent co-authors working with Boudewijn R. Haverkort include:

  • Raghavendran Gunasekaran
  • Hossain Muhammad Muctadir
  • David A. Manrique Negrin
  • Loek Cleophas
  • Mark van den Brand

The scientist has published in venues such as Software & Systems Modeling, the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, and Research Evaluation.

Boudewijn R. Haverkort was recognized as an IEEE Fellow in 2007 for contributions to performance and dependability evaluation of computer and communication systems.

Best Publications

  • Model-checking algorithms for continuous-time Markov chains

    C. Baier;B. Haverkort;H. Hermanns;J.-P. Katoen

  • Validation of Stochastic Systems : A Guide to Current Research

    Christel Baier;Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Joost-Pieter Katoen;Holger Hermanns

  • Which battery model to use

    Marijn R. Jongerden;Boudewijn R. Haverkort

  • Performability modelling tools and techniques

    Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Ignas G. Niemegeers

  • Model Checking Continuous-Time Markov Chains by Transient Analysis

    Christel Baier;Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Holger Hermanns;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • Composite performance and dependability analysis

    Kishor S. Trivedi;Jogesh K. Muppala;Steven P. Woolet;Boudewijn R.H.M. Haverkort

  • Performability Modelling Tools, Evaluation Techniques and Applications

    B.R.H.M. Haverkort

  • Efficient computation of time-bounded reachability probabilities in uniform continuous-time Markov decision processes

    Christel Baier;Holger Hermanns;Joost-Pieter Katoen;Boudewijn R. Haverkort

  • On the Logical Characterisation of Performability Properties

    Christel Baier;Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Holger Hermanns;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • Fitting world-wide web request traces with the EM-algorithm

    Rachid El Abdouni Khayari;Ramin Sadre;Boudewijn R. Haverkort

  • Validation of stochastic systems

    Christel Baier;Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Holger Hermanns;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • Performance of computer communication systems

    Boudewijn R. Haverkort

  • On the use of model checking techniques for dependability evaluation

    B.R. Haverkort;H. Hermanns;J.-P. Katoen

  • Performance evaluation and model checking join forces

    Christel Baier;Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Holger Hermanns;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • Model checking performability properties

    B. Haverkort;L. Cloth;H. Hermanns;J.-P. Katoen

  • Specification Techniques for Markov Reward Models

    Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Kishor S. Trivedi

  • Model Checking Markov Chains with Actions and State Labels

    C. Baier;L. Cloth;B.R. Haverkort;M. Kuntz

  • Formal Methods: Applications and Technology

    Luboš Brim;Boudewijn Haverkort;Martin Leucker;Jaco van de Pol

  • Smart Industry: How ICT Will Change the Game!

    Boudewijn R. Haverkort;Armin Zimmermann

  • Performance and reliability analysis of computer systems: An example-based approach using the sharpe software package

    Boudewijn R. Haverkort

  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

    J. Arlat;A. Bondavalli;B.R.H.M. Haverkort;P. Verissimo

Frequent Co-Authors

Joost-Pieter Katoen
Joost-Pieter Katoen RWTH Aachen University
Holger Hermanns
Holger Hermanns Saarland University
Christel Baier
Christel Baier TU Dresden
Kishor S. Trivedi
Kishor S. Trivedi Duke University
Wan Fokkink
Wan Fokkink Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Mariëlle Stoelinga
Mariëlle Stoelinga University of Twente
Jaco van de Pol
Jaco van de Pol Aarhus University
Martin Leucker
Martin Leucker University of Lübeck
Kim Guldstrand Larsen
Kim Guldstrand Larsen Aalborg University
Aiko Pras
Aiko Pras University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA often opens doors to related fields and versatile career options. Many students ask, can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—there are various accredited online programs in physics that offer flexibility for busy students or working professionals.

Data science is another booming field. If you’re considering a more affordable path, it’s worth researching what is the cheapest data science course in the us? Many reputable universities now offer online degrees and certificates at competitive rates without compromising on quality.

Engineering is closely tied to computer science. Interested in expanding your knowledge? Explore online electrical engineering courses USA—these courses can supplement your CS studies and improve job prospects in tech-driven industries.

For those seeking a quick skills boost or credentials that lead to high salaries, check out these certificate programs that pay well. Online certifications in IT, cybersecurity, and data analysis can be completed in less time and often lead to lucrative job opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Boudewijn R. Haverkort

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles