World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
34815
World Ranking
10433
National Ranking
5372

Richard E. Peterson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Peterson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 296 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard E. Peterson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Peterson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard E. Peterson is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on multiple subfields including Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Surgery, Spectroscopy, and Molecular Biology.

Their recent publications include work on diverse and specialized topics. Notable recent papers are:

  • The 2022 world health organization reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for polychlorinated dioxins, dibenzofurans and biphenyls (2023), Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Denoising of Mass Spectrometry Images via Inverse Maximum Signal Factors Analysis (2022), Analytical Chemistry
  • BCL-X L -targeting antibody-drug conjugates are active in preclinical models and mitigate on-mechanism toxicity of small-molecule inhibitors (2024), Science Advances
  • Synthesis and biological evaluation of FICZ analogues as agonists of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (2020), Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
  • Differential effect of gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on insulinotropic action of endogenous incretins (2023), Obesity

Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Obesity
  • Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard E. Peterson are:

  • Marzieh Salehi
  • Samantha Pezzica
  • Ralph A. DeFronzo
  • Amalia Gastaldelli
  • Bonnie J. Tyler

The scientist's work addresses several main research topics, which include:

  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Ion-surface interactions and analysis

This body of research reflects a diverse set of focuses ranging from clinical impacts of bariatric surgery and diabetes control mechanisms, to advanced analytical chemistry techniques such as mass spectrometry, as well as toxicological assessment of environmental pollutants and chemical agents.

Best Publications

  • The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

    Martin Van den Berg;Linda S. Birnbaum;Michael Denison;Mike De Vito

  • Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife

    M. van den Berg;L. Birnbaum;A.T.C. Bosveld;B. Brunstrom

  • Zebrafish as a model vertebrate for investigating chemical toxicity.

    Adrian J. Hill;Hiroki Teraoka;Warren Heideman;Richard E. Peterson

  • Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity of Dioxins and Related Compounds: Cross-Species Comparisons

    Peterson Re;Theobald Hm;Kimmel Gl

  • In utero and lactational exposure of male rats to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. 1. Effects on androgenic status.

    Thomas A. Mably;Robert W. Moore;Richard E. Peterson

  • In utero and lactational exposure of male rats to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. 3. Effects on spermatogenesis and reproductive capability.

    Thomas A. Mably;Donald L. Bjerke;Robert W. Moore;Annette Gendron-Fitzpatrick

  • Overview of a workshop on screening methods for detecting potential (anti‐) estrogenic/androgenic chemicals in wildlife

    Gerald T. Ankley;Ellen Mihaich;Ralph G. Stahl;Donald E. Tillitt

  • Abnormalities of sexual development in male rats with in utero and lactational exposure to the antiandrogenic plasticizer Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.

    Robert W. Moore;Thomas A. Rudy;Tien-Min Lin;Kinarm Ko

  • Potencies of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, dibenzofuran, and biphenyl congeners, relative to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, for producing early life stage mortality in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

    Mary K. Walker;Richard E. Peterson

  • Early life stage toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

    Tala R. Henry;Jan M. Spitsbergen;Michael W. Hornung;Christian C. Abnet

  • Functional aspects of developmental toxicity of polyhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbons in experimental animals and human infants

    Abraham Brouwer;Ulf G. Ahlborg;Martin Van den Berg;Linda S. Birnbaum

  • Heart Malformation Is an Early Response to TCDD in Embryonic Zebrafish

    Dagmara S. Antkiewicz;C. Geoffrey Burns;Sara A. Carney;Richard E. Peterson

  • In utero and lactational exposure of male rats to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. 2. Effects on sexual behavior and the regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion in adulthood.

    Thomas A. Mably;Robert W. Moore;Robert W. Goy;Richard E. Peterson

  • A ligand for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor isolated from lung.

    Jiasheng Song;Margaret Clagett-Dame;Richard E. Peterson;Mark E. Hahn

  • Aryl hydrocarbon receptor 2 mediates 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin developmental toxicity in zebrafish.

    Amy L. Prasch;Hiroki Teraoka;Sara A. Carney;Wu Dong

  • Tissue distribution, metabolism, and elimination of perfluorooctanoic acid in male and female rats

    John P. Vanden Heuvel;Benedict I. Kuslikis;Marc J. Van Rafelghem;Richard E. Peterson

  • Physiological role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in mouse ovary development.

    Jamie C. Benedict;Tien Min Lin;I. K. Loeffler;Richard E. Peterson

  • Tissue-Specific Expression of AHR2, ARNT2, and CYP1A in Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae: Effects of Developmental Stage and 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Exposure

    Eric A. Andreasen;Jan M. Spitsbergen;Robert L. Tanguay;John J. Stegeman

  • 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Toxicity in the Zebrafish Embryo: Local Circulation Failure in the Dorsal Midbrain Is Associated with Increased Apoptosis

    Wu Dong;Hiroki Teraoka;Koji Yamazaki;Shusaku Tsukiyama

  • Latent TGF-β binding protein 3 identifies a second heart field in zebrafish

    Yong Zhou;Timothy J. Cashman;Kathleen R. Nevis;Pablo Obregon

Frequent Co-Authors

Warren Heideman
Warren Heideman University of Wisconsin–Madison
John P. Vanden Heuvel
John P. Vanden Heuvel Pennsylvania State University
John J. Stegeman
John J. Stegeman Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Paul S. Cooke
Paul S. Cooke University of Florida
Robert L. Tanguay
Robert L. Tanguay Oregon State University
Robert J. Hamers
Robert J. Hamers University of Wisconsin–Madison
Chiharu Tohyama
Chiharu Tohyama University of Tokyo
Hector F. DeLuca
Hector F. DeLuca University of Wisconsin–Madison
Stephen Safe
Stephen Safe Texas A&M University
Mark E. Hahn
Mark E. Hahn Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, there are several alternative and related pathways beyond traditional medical school. One popular option is pursuing an advanced nursing degree even if you don't have a prior nursing background. Several online msn programs for non nurses allow students from other fields to earn a Master of Science in Nursing in an accelerated format.

Additionally, finding direct entry nursing programs can help you transition into the nursing profession quickly, even if you hold a degree in an unrelated field. For those looking to avoid lengthy entrance exams, check out nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams, which can streamline your admissions process.

Not everyone interested in healthcare wants to work directly with patients. Medical office roles are in high demand and often more accessible. If this path interests you, many accredited institutions offer financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, making these programs more affordable and attainable.

Best Scientists Citing Richard E. Peterson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles