World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7335
World Ranking
7187
National Ranking
46

Elena Gardella publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Gardella sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Elena Gardella D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Gardella sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elena Gardella is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their research spans multiple fields within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a significant focus on genetics, psychiatry and mental health, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their work primarily centers on several main topics, including:

  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Recent publications illustrate the scope of their research interests and collaborations. Notable papers include:

  • Automated Interpretation of Clinical Electroencephalograms Using Artificial Intelligence, 2023, JAMA Neurology
  • Assessing the landscape of STXBP1-related disorders in 534 individuals, 2021, Brain
  • KCNT1-related epilepsies and epileptic encephalopathies: phenotypic and mutational spectrum, 2021, Brain
  • Novel congenital disorder of O-linked glycosylation caused by GALNT2 loss of function, 2020, Brain
  • Gain-of-function and loss-of-function GABRB3 variants lead to distinct clinical phenotypes in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, 2022, Nature Communications

Frequently appearing as coauthors in their research are Rikke S. Møller, Guido Rubboli, Pasquale Striano, Francesca Furia, and Katrine M. Johannesen. These collaborators have contributed to multiple publications, reflecting ongoing teamwork within their scientific network.

Gardella's research output has been published recurrently in several prominent venues, including:

  • Epilepsia
  • Epileptic Disorders
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain
  • Neurology

Best Publications

  • Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity suggest therapeutic implications in SCN2A-related disorders.

    Markus Wolff;Katrine M Johannesen;Ulrike B S Hedrich;Silvia Masnada

  • Salzburg Consensus Criteria for Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus – approach to clinical application

    M Leitinger;S Beniczky;A Rohracher;E Gardella

  • Encephalopathy with electrical status epilepticus during slow sleep or ESES syndrome including the acquired aphasia.

    C. A. Tassinari;G. Rubboli;L. Volpi;Stefano Meletti

  • Diagnostic accuracy of the Salzburg EEG criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus: a retrospective study.

    Markus Leitinger;Eugen Trinka;Elena Gardella;Alexandra Rohracher

  • The phenotypic spectrum of SCN8A encephalopathy

    Jan Larsen;Gemma L Carvill;Elena Gardella;Gerhard Kluger

  • Central pattern generators for a common semiology in fronto-limbic seizures and in parasomnias. A neuroethologic approach

    C. A. Tassinari;G. Rubboli;E. Gardella;G. Cantalupo

  • Benign infantile seizures and paroxysmal dyskinesia caused by an SCN8A mutation

    Elena Gardella;Felicitas Becker;Rikke S. Møller;Julian Schubert

  • Automated Interpretation of Clinical Electroencephalograms Using Artificial Intelligence

    Unknown

  • Clinical spectrum and genotype–phenotype associations of KCNA2-related encephalopathies

    Silvia Masnada;Ulrike B S Hedrich;Elena Gardella;Julian Schubert

  • Phenotypic spectrum of GABRA1: From generalized epilepsies to severe epileptic encephalopathies

    Katrine Johannesen;Carla Marini;Siona Pfeffer;Rikke S. Møller;Rikke S. Møller

  • Mutations in KCNT1 cause a spectrum of focal epilepsies

    Rikke Steensbjerre Møller;Sarah E. Heron;Line H. G. Larsen;Chiao Xin Lim

  • The phenotype of SCN8A developmental and epileptic encephalopathy.

    Elena Gardella;Carla Marini;Marina Trivisano;Mark P Fitzgerald;Mark P Fitzgerald

  • GEBR-7b, a novel PDE4D selective inhibitor that improves memory in rodents at non-emetic doses

    O. Bruno;E. Fedele;J. Prickaerts;L. A. Parker

  • Neurologic phenotypes associated with COL4A1/2 mutations: Expanding the spectrum of disease.

    Sara Zagaglia;Sara Zagaglia;Christina Selch;Jelena Radic Nisevic;Davide Mei

  • Defining the phenotypic spectrum of SLC6A1 mutations.

    Katrine M. Johannesen;Elena Gardella;Tarja Linnankivi;Carolina Courage

  • Genotype-phenotype correlations in SCN8A-related disorders reveal prognostic and therapeutic implications.

    Katrine M Johannesen;Yuanyuan Liu;Mahmoud Koko;Cathrine E Gjerulfsen

  • Neuroethological approach to frontolimbic epileptic seizures and parasomnias: The same central pattern generators for the same behaviours.

    C. A. Tassinari;G. Cantalupo;B. Högl;P. Cortelli

  • Standardized Computer-based Organized Reporting of EEG: SCORE – second version

    Sándor Beniczky;Harald Aurlien;Jan C. Brøgger;Lawrence J. Hirsch

  • Neuronal mechanisms of mutations in SCN8A causing epilepsy or intellectual disability

    Yuanyuan Liu;Julian Schubert;Lukas Sonnenberg;Katherine L Helbig

  • Gain-of-function and loss-of-function GABRB3 variants lead to distinct clinical phenotypes in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies

    Unknown

  • Patients with epilepsy and patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: Video-EEG, clinical and neuropsychological evaluation

    Katherine Turner;Ada Piazzini;Valentina Chiesa;Valentina Barbieri

  • Genotype-phenotype correlations in SCN8A-related disorders reveal prognostic and therapeutic implications

    Katrine M Johannesen;Yuanyuan Liu;Cathrine E Gjerulfsen;Mahmoud Koko

Frequent Co-Authors

Rikke S. Møller
Rikke S. Møller University of Southern Denmark
Carlo Alberto Tassinari
Carlo Alberto Tassinari University of Bologna
Guido Rubboli
Guido Rubboli University of Copenhagen
Stefano Meletti
Stefano Meletti University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Ingo Helbig
Ingo Helbig Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Sándor Beniczky
Sándor Beniczky Aarhus University Hospital
Maria Paola Canevini
Maria Paola Canevini University of Milan
Gaetan Lesca
Gaetan Lesca Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Pasquale Striano
Pasquale Striano University of Genoa
Laura Tassi
Laura Tassi University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience intersects with many fields, offering diverse career pathways. Students interested in mental health and social services may consider msw accelerated programs, which prepare graduates for advanced roles in social work. These programs offer a faster track to entering the workforce while still delivering essential skills for working with diverse communities.

For those drawn to human behavior or therapy, accelerated psychology programs provide a flexible, online option to gain foundational knowledge in psychology. Such degrees support entry into roles like research assistants or pave the way for further graduate studies.

If you are considering a career in counseling, pursuing cacrep accredited counseling programs ensures that your education meets recognized professional standards, improving job prospects and credibility with employers. Many professionals also explore online counseling programs as a cost-effective way to earn credentials and specialize in various counseling settings.

Exploring these related online degrees can broaden your career options, providing numerous paths within neuroscience-related industries and mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Elena Gardella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles