World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
90
Citations
25012
World Ranking
599
National Ranking
40

Chemistry

D-Index
83
Citations
20219
World Ranking
3012
National Ranking
225

Henner Hollert publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henner Hollert sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 523 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Henner Hollert D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henner Hollert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Henner Hollert is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany and has contributed extensively to environmental science research. Their work primarily focuses on environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, covering a range of topics related to pollution, chemical impacts, and organismal behavior in contaminated environments.

Their recent publications include research on environmental monitoring, ecological risks, and pollution effects, specifically:

  • Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in raw and treated wastewater in Germany - Suitability for COVID-19 surveillance and potential transmission risks (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Ecological risk assessment of fifty pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in Chinese surface waters: A proposed multiple-level system (2020, Environment International)
  • The Role of Behavioral Ecotoxicology in Environmental Protection (2021, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • Microplastics Lead to Hyperactive Swimming Behaviour in Adult Zebrafish (2020, Aquatic Toxicology)
  • An emerging role of microplastics in the etiology of lung ground glass nodules (2022, Environmental Sciences Europe)

Their research topics encompass a variety of environmental concerns, such as:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

The scientist's work spans main fields of Environmental Science with a strong emphasis on subfields including:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Ecology
  • Plant Science
  • Molecular Biology

Henner Hollert frequently collaborates with several co-authors who have contributed to numerous joint publications. These include:

  • Werner Brack
  • Thomas-Benjamin Seiler
  • Martin Krauß
  • Andreas Schiwy
  • Sabrina Schiwy

The scholar's work is regularly published in scientific venues focused on environmental and pollution research such as:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Sciences Europe
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Environmental Pollution

Best Publications

  • Zebrafish embryos as an alternative to animal experiments--a commentary on the definition of the onset of protected life stages in animal welfare regulations.

    Uwe Strähle;Stefan Scholz;Robert Geisler;Petra Greiner

  • Quantitative investigation of the mechanisms of microplastics and nanoplastics toward zebrafish larvae locomotor activity.

    Qiqing Chen;Michael Gundlach;Shouye Yang;Jing Jiang

  • Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites—contemporary and future relevance and challenges

    Roland Weber;Caroline Gaus;Mats Tysklind;Paul Johnston

  • Towards an alternative for the acute fish LC(50) test in chemical assessment: the fish embryo toxicity test goes multi-species -- an update.

    Thomas Braunbeck;Melanie Boettcher;Henner Hollert;Thomas Kosmehl

  • Enhanced uptake of BPA in the presence of nanoplastics can lead to neurotoxic effects in adult zebrafish

    Qiqing Chen;Daqiang Yin;Yunlu Jia;Sabrina Schiwy

  • Effect-directed analysis supporting monitoring of aquatic environments - An in-depth overview

    Werner Brack;Selim Ait-Aissa;Robert M. Burgess;Wibke Busch

  • Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

    Werner Brack;Werner Brack;Valeria Dulio;Marlene Ågerstrand;Ian Allan

  • Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in raw and treated wastewater in Germany – Suitability for COVID-19 surveillance and potential transmission risks

    Sandra Westhaus;Frank Andreas Weber;Sabrina Schiwy;Volker Linnemann

  • Ecological risk assessment of fifty pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in Chinese surface waters: A proposed multiple-level system.

    Na Liu;Xiaowei Jin;Chenglian Feng;Zijian Wang

  • Future water quality monitoring--adapting tools to deal with mixtures of pollutants in water resource management.

    Rolf Altenburger;Selim Ait-Aissa;Philipp Antczak;Thomas Backhaus

  • Effects of virgin microplastics on goldfish (Carassius auratus).

    Khalida Jabeen;Bowen Li;Qiqing Chen;Lei Su

  • Optimization of screening-level risk assessment and priority selection of emerging pollutants - The case of pharmaceuticals in European surface waters

    Shangbo Zhou;Carolina Di Paolo;Xinda Wu;Ying Shao

  • The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive

    Ann-Sofie Wernersson;Mario Carere;Chiara Maggi;Petr Tusil

  • Leaching of endocrine disrupting chemicals from marine microplastics and mesoplastics under common life stress conditions

    Qiqing Chen;Qiqing Chen;Annika Allgeier;Daqiang Yin;Henner Hollert

  • Effect-based trigger values for in vitro and in vivo bioassays performed on surface water extracts supporting the environmental quality standards (EQS) of the European Water Framework Directive.

    Beate I. Escher;Selim Aїt-Aїssa;Peter A. Behnisch;Werner Brack;Werner Brack

  • A new sediment contact assay to assess particle-bound pollutants using zebrafish (danio rerio) embryos

    Henner Hollert;Steffen Keiter;Natalie König;Marc Rudolf

  • Future water quality monitoring: improving the balance between exposure and toxicity assessments of real-world pollutant mixtures

    Rolf Altenburger;Rolf Altenburger;Werner Brack;Werner Brack;Robert M. Burgess;Wibke Busch

  • Effect-based methods are key. The European Collaborative Project SOLUTIONS recommends integrating effect-based methods for diagnosis and monitoring of water quality

    Werner Brack;Selim Ait Aissa;Thomas Backhaus;Valeria Dulio

  • The SOLUTIONS project: challenges and responses for present and future emerging pollutants in land and water resources management.

    Werner Brack;Rolf Altenburger;Gerrit Schüürmann;Martin Krauss

  • An ecotoxicological view on neurotoxicity assessment

    J. B. Legradi;J. B. Legradi;C. Di Paolo;M. H. S. Kraak;H. G. van der Geest

  • Should the Sediment Quality Triad Become a Tetrad, a Pentad, or Possibly even a Hexad?

    Peter M. Chapman;Henner Hollert

  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research

    Philippe Garrigues;Emmanuelle Pignard-Péguet;Åke Bergman

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Brack
Werner Brack Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Andreas Schäffer
Andreas Schäffer RWTH Aachen University
Thomas Braunbeck
Thomas Braunbeck Heidelberg University
Markus Hecker
Markus Hecker University of Saskatchewan
Beate I. Escher
Beate I. Escher Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
John P. Giesy
John P. Giesy University of Saskatchewan
Rolf Altenburger
Rolf Altenburger Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Martin Krauss
Martin Krauss Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Klára Hilscherová
Klára Hilscherová Masaryk University
Juliane Hollender
Juliane Hollender Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career paths. Those seeking flexibility might consider the most affordable online general studies degree programs, which offer broad educational foundations useful in environmental policy and management roles.

If you aim to deepen your expertise or transition into clinical and community aspects of environmental health, investigating the cheapest online dsw programs could be beneficial. These programs emphasize social work disciplines, addressing social determinants of health and environmental justice issues.

When selecting an undergraduate option, many wonder about the easiest bachelor's degree to get. While “easy” varies by individual, degrees with flexible curricula can support students juggling environmental science with other responsibilities.

For those specifically interested in Earth sciences and natural resources, earning one of the best online geology degrees offers rigorous training in geoscience. This pathway leads to careers in environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation.

Exploring these related degree options online allows prospective students to balance affordability, interest, and career goals while contributing to global environmental solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Henner Hollert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles