| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 64 | 2575 | 2495 | 147 | 145 | 201 | 18392 |
The chart shows the history of publications by David Parker between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Parker published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2014. 37 of the 514 publications appeared in the last two years.
514 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 2 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 1 |
| 1983 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1 |
| 1985 | 0 |
| 1986 | 0 |
| 1987 | 1 |
| 1988 | 0 |
| 1989 | 2 |
| 1990 | 4 |
| 1991 | 2 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 3 |
| 1994 | 5 |
| 1995 | 7 |
| 1996 | 4 |
| 1997 | 16 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 9 |
| 2001 | 14 |
| 2002 | 13 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2004 | 23 |
| 2005 | 11 |
| 2006 | 21 |
| 2007 | 13 |
| 2008 | 27 |
| 2009 | 21 |
| 2010 | 18 |
| 2011 | 20 |
| 2012 | 21 |
| 2013 | 16 |
| 2014 | 37 |
| 2015 | 23 |
| 2016 | 21 |
| 2017 | 23 |
| 2018 | 17 |
| 2019 | 18 |
| 2020 | 13 |
| 2021 | 17 |
| 2022 | 6 |
| 2023 | 10 |
| 2024 | 18 |
| 2025 | 19 |
| Total | 514 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Parker sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile
47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 32–41 | 7 | |
| 42–51 | 22 | |
| 52–61 | 82 | |
| 62–71 | 134 | |
| 72–81 | 249 | |
| 82–91 | 324 | |
| 92–101 | 421 | |
| 102–111 | 420 | |
| 112–121 | 497 | |
| 122–131 | 544 | |
| 132–141 | 555 | |
| 142–151 | 609 | |
| 152–161 | 559 | |
| 162–171 | 534 | |
| 172–181 | 556 | |
| 182–191 | 583 | |
| 192–201 | 519 | 201 |
| 202–211 | 508 | |
| 212–221 | 490 | |
| 222–231 | 437 | |
| 232–241 | 423 | |
| 242–251 | 408 | |
| 252–261 | 377 | |
| 262–271 | 301 | |
| 272–281 | 335 | |
| 282–291 | 320 | |
| 292–301 | 293 | |
| 302–311 | 250 | |
| 312–321 | 238 | |
| 322–331 | 206 | |
| 332–341 | 209 | |
| 342–351 | 208 | |
| 352–361 | 162 | |
| 362–371 | 176 | |
| 372–381 | 127 | |
| 382–391 | 158 | |
| 392–401 | 128 | |
| 402–411 | 104 | |
| 412–421 | 94 | |
| 422–431 | 99 | |
| 432–441 | 83 | |
| 442–451 | 108 | |
| 452–461 | 73 | |
| 462–471 | 77 | |
| 472–481 | 69 | |
| 482–491 | 84 | |
| 492–501 | 62 | |
| 502–511 | 54 | |
| 512–521 | 57 | |
| 522–531 | 51 | |
| 532–541 | 51 | |
| 542–551 | 32 | |
| 552–561 | 38 | |
| 562–571 | 28 | |
| 572–581 | 43 | |
| 582–591 | 33 | |
| 592–601 | 41 | |
| 602–611 | 32 | |
| 612–621 | 28 | |
| 622–631 | 25 | |
| 632–641 | 27 | |
| 642–651 | 17 | |
| 652–661 | 20 | |
| 662–671 | 17 | |
| 672–681 | 15 | |
| 682–691 | 14 | |
| 692–701 | 21 | |
| 702–711 | 13 | |
| 712–721 | 12 | |
| 722–731 | 19 | |
| 732–741 | 14 | |
| 742–751 | 12 | |
| 752–761 | 10 | |
| 762–771 | 10 | |
| 772–781 | 11 | |
| 782–791 | 10 | |
| 792–801 | 11 | |
| 802–811 | 8 | |
| 812–821 | 8 | |
| 822–831 | 7 | |
| 832–841 | 11 | |
| 842–851 | 10 | |
| 852–861 | 5 | |
| 862–871 | 9 | |
| 872–881 | 4 | |
| 882–891 | 6 | |
| 892–901 | 3 | |
| 902–911 | 6 | |
| 912–921 | 3 | |
| 922–931 | 2 | |
| 932–941 | 2 | |
| 942–951 | 2 | |
| 952–961 | 3 | |
| 962–971 | 3 | |
| 972–981 | 3 | |
| 982–990 | 5 | |
| 991+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Parker sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile
82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 879 | |
| 32–33 | 983 | |
| 34–35 | 918 | |
| 36–37 | 990 | |
| 38–39 | 968 | |
| 40–41 | 907 | |
| 42–43 | 821 | |
| 44–45 | 763 | |
| 46–47 | 689 | |
| 48–49 | 543 | |
| 50–51 | 543 | |
| 52–53 | 518 | |
| 54–55 | 500 | |
| 56–57 | 458 | |
| 58–59 | 400 | |
| 60–61 | 337 | |
| 62–63 | 308 | |
| 64–65 | 292 | 64 |
| 66–67 | 249 | |
| 68–69 | 213 | |
| 70–71 | 192 | |
| 72–73 | 189 | |
| 74–75 | 165 | |
| 76–77 | 139 | |
| 78–79 | 119 | |
| 80–81 | 121 | |
| 82–83 | 113 | |
| 84–85 | 88 | |
| 86–87 | 87 | |
| 88–89 | 75 | |
| 90–91 | 69 | |
| 92–93 | 57 | |
| 94–95 | 46 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 34 | |
| 100–101 | 36 | |
| 102–103 | 27 | |
| 104–105 | 37 | |
| 106–107 | 18 | |
| 108–109 | 31 | |
| 110–111 | 19 | |
| 112–113 | 16 | |
| 114–115 | 12 | |
| 116–117 | 20 | |
| 118–119 | 15 | |
| 120–121 | 5 | |
| 122–123 | 20 | |
| 124–125 | 8 | |
| 126–127 | 5 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130 | 3 | |
| 131+ | 98 |
David Parker is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Materials Science. Within these broad domains, their work particularly focuses on subfields such as Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Materials Chemistry, and Inorganic Chemistry.
The researcher is associated with several specialized topics including Advanced Condensed Matter Physics, Magnetic and Transport Properties of Perovskites and Related Materials, Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism, Rare-earth and Actinide Compounds, Topological Materials and Phenomena, Iron-based Superconductors Research, and Magnetic Properties of Alloys.
David Parker has authored numerous papers, with a selection of recent publications showcasing the diversity of their research interests:
Their work appears frequently in several publication venues, with the highest number of publications found in:
David Parker collaborates often with a number of co-authors, including:
Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Andrew Hinton;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Vojtech Forejt;Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Taolue Chen;Vojtech Forejt;Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;David Parker
Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker;Jeremy Sproston
Miri Song;David Parker
Håkan L. S. Younes;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
David Anthony Parker
J. J. Rutten;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
John Heath;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Tomáš Brázdil;Krishnendu Chatterjee;Martin Chmelík;Vojtěch Forejt
M. Kwiatkowska;G. Norman;D. Parker
Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Marie Duflot;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Luca de Alfaro;Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker
Taolue Chen;Vojtěch Forejt;Marta Kwiatkowska;David Parker
Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker;Hongyang Qu
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it's important to understand your options for skill development and career advancement. Many students and professionals look for certifications for jobs that open doors to well-paid positions without requiring years of study. These certifications can boost your resume and help you specialize in high-demand technologies quickly.
If you are interested in accelerating your academic progress, you might explore the quickest online masters degree options. These programs are ideal for those eager to move up in their careers without a lengthy time commitment. Alternatively, students just beginning their academic journey can benefit from earning an online associate degree, which provides foundational knowledge and flexible career pathways in tech fields.
Choosing the right graduate degree is also key for long-term success. Consider reviewing what masters program should I do to ensure your investment matches current industry needs and job market demand. By combining strategic education choices with relevant certifications, you can build a strong and adaptable technology career.
University of South Carolina
University of Messina
The Ohio State University
University of California, Berkeley
Université Laval
Kiel University
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Swansea University
École de Technologie Supérieure
Keio University
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Indiana University
Charité - University Medicine Berlin
University of Illinois at Chicago
University of Alberta
Holon Institute of Technology