World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 64 2575 2495 147 145 201 18392

David Parker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Parker between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Parker published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2014. 37 of the 514 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2014. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 19 publications
1977 2025

514 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Parker: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 2
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 5
1995 7
1996 4
1997 16
1998 1
1999 3
2000 9
2001 14
2002 13
2003 11
2004 23
2005 11
2006 21
2007 13
2008 27
2009 21
2010 18
2011 20
2012 21
2013 16
2014 37
2015 23
2016 21
2017 23
2018 17
2019 18
2020 13
2021 17
2022 6
2023 10
2024 18
2025 19
Total 514
Download as CSV

David Parker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Parker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 201
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

David Parker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Parker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292 64
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David Parker is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Materials Science. Within these broad domains, their work particularly focuses on subfields such as Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Materials Chemistry, and Inorganic Chemistry.

The researcher is associated with several specialized topics including Advanced Condensed Matter Physics, Magnetic and Transport Properties of Perovskites and Related Materials, Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism, Rare-earth and Actinide Compounds, Topological Materials and Phenomena, Iron-based Superconductors Research, and Magnetic Properties of Alloys.

David Parker has authored numerous papers, with a selection of recent publications showcasing the diversity of their research interests:

  • Manufacturing Processes for Permanent Magnets: Part I-Sintering and Casting, 2022, published in JOM
  • Proximate Spin Liquid and Fractionalization in the Triangular Antiferromagnet KYbSe2, 2023, published in Nature Physics
  • Van Hove Singularity in the Magnon Spectrum of the Antiferromagnetic Quantum Honeycomb Lattice, 2021, published in Nature Communications
  • Manufacturing Processes for Permanent Magnets: Part II-Bonding and Emerging Methods, 2022, published in JOM
  • Origin of Ultralow Phonon Transport and Strong Anharmonicity in Lead-Free Halide Perovskites, 2022, published in Materials Today Physics

Their work appears frequently in several publication venues, with the highest number of publications found in:

  • Physical Review B
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physical Review Materials
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

David Parker collaborates often with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Athena S. Sefat
  • Lucas Lindsay
  • Michael A. McGuire
  • Andrew F. May
  • Raphaël P. Hermann

Best Publications

  • PRISM 4.0: verification of probabilistic real-time systems

    Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • PRISM : A tool for automatic verification of probabilistic systems

    Andrew Hinton;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • PRISM: Probabilistic Symbolic Model Checker

    Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Stochastic model checking

    Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Probabilistic Symbolic Model Checking with PRISM: A Hybrid Approach

    Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Automated Verification Techniques for Probabilistic Systems

    Vojtech Forejt;Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Automatic verification of competitive stochastic systems

    Taolue Chen;Vojtech Forejt;Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;David Parker

  • PRISM: probabilistic model checking for performance and reliability analysis

    Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Performance analysis of probabilistic timed automata using digital clocks

    Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker;Jeremy Sproston

  • Commonality, Difference and the Dynamics of Disclosure in In-Depth Interviewing

    Miri Song;David Parker

  • Numerical vs. statistical probabilistic model checking

    Håkan L. S. Younes;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Implementation of symbolic model checking for probabilistic systems

    David Anthony Parker

  • Mathematical Techniques for Analyzing Concurrent and Probabilistic Systems

    J. J. Rutten;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Probabilistic model checking of complex biological pathways

    John Heath;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Verification of Markov Decision Processes Using Learning Algorithms

    Tomáš Brázdil;Krishnendu Chatterjee;Martin Chmelík;Vojtěch Forejt

  • PRISM 2.0: a tool for probabilistic model checking

    M. Kwiatkowska;G. Norman;D. Parker

  • Symmetry reduction for probabilistic model checking

    Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • A formal analysis of bluetooth device discovery

    Marie Duflot;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • Symbolic Model Checking of Probabilistic Processes Using MTBDDs and the Kronecker Representation

    Luca de Alfaro;Marta Z. Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

  • PRISM-games: a model checker for stochastic multi-player games

    Taolue Chen;Vojtěch Forejt;Marta Kwiatkowska;David Parker

  • Assume-Guarantee verification for probabilistic systems

    Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker;Hongyang Qu

Frequent Co-Authors

Marta Kwiatkowska
Marta Kwiatkowska University of Oxford
Gethin Norman
Gethin Norman University of Glasgow
Jonathan Seville
Jonathan Seville University of Birmingham
Yulong Ding
Yulong Ding University of Birmingham
Peter J. Fryer
Peter J. Fryer University of Birmingham
Ricky D. Wildman
Ricky D. Wildman University of Nottingham
Prakash Panangaden
Prakash Panangaden McGill University
Jonathan M. Huntley
Jonathan M. Huntley Loughborough University
David J. Singh
David J. Singh University of Missouri
NG Niels Deen
NG Niels Deen Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it's important to understand your options for skill development and career advancement. Many students and professionals look for certifications for jobs that open doors to well-paid positions without requiring years of study. These certifications can boost your resume and help you specialize in high-demand technologies quickly.

If you are interested in accelerating your academic progress, you might explore the quickest online masters degree options. These programs are ideal for those eager to move up in their careers without a lengthy time commitment. Alternatively, students just beginning their academic journey can benefit from earning an online associate degree, which provides foundational knowledge and flexible career pathways in tech fields.

Choosing the right graduate degree is also key for long-term success. Consider reviewing what masters program should I do to ensure your investment matches current industry needs and job market demand. By combining strategic education choices with relevant certifications, you can build a strong and adaptable technology career.

Best Scientists Citing David Parker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles