World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
27183
World Ranking
10196
National Ranking
562

Manfred Dietel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manfred Dietel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 405 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Manfred Dietel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manfred Dietel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Manfred Dietel is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on subfields including Cancer Research, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their work covers several key topics such as Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and PARP inhibition in cancer therapy.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Manfred Dietel include Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Korinna Jöhrens, Albrecht Stenzinger, and Reinhard Büttner.

The scientist has published extensively in various venues. Notable publication venues where multiple works have appeared are:

  • Die Pathologie
  • Der Pathologe
  • Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Manfred Dietel include:

  • Establishing guidelines to harmonize tumor mutational burden (TMB): in silico assessment of variation in TMB quantification across diagnostic platforms: phase I of the Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project, 2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Harmonization and Standardization of Panel-Based Tumor Mutational Burden Measurement: Real-World Results and Recommendations of the Quality in Pathology Study, 2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • <scp>NTRK</scp> testing: First results of the <scp>QuiP-EQA</scp> scheme and a comprehensive map of <scp><i>NTRK</i></scp> fusion variants and their diagnostic coverage by targeted <scp>RNA</scp>-based <scp>NGS</scp> assays, 2020, Genes Chromosomes and Cancer
  • Testing for deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability, 2023, Die Pathologie
  • MSI testing, 2021, Der Pathologe

Best Publications

  • Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Carboplatin in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive and Triple-Negative Primary Breast Cancers

    Carsten Denkert;Gunter von Minckwitz;Jan C. Brase;Bruno V. Sinn

  • A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal.

    Guido Rindi;David S. Klimstra;Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani;Sylvia L. Asa

  • Histone deacetylases 1, 2 and 3 are highly expressed in prostate cancer and HDAC2 expression is associated with shorter PSA relapse time after radical prostatectomy

    W Weichert;A Röske;V Gekeler;T Beckers

  • Atypical multidrug resistance: breast cancer resistance protein messenger RNA expression in mitoxantrone-selected cell lines.

    Douglas D. Ross;Weidong Yang;Lynne V. Abruzzo;William S. Dalton

  • Mass spectrometry-based metabolic profiling reveals different metabolite patterns in invasive ovarian carcinomas and ovarian borderline tumors.

    Carsten Denkert;Jan Budczies;Tobias Kind;Wilko Weichert

  • Association of patterns of class I histone deacetylase expression with patient prognosis in gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis

    Wilko Weichert;Annika Röske;Volker Gekeler;Thomas Beckers

  • Value of p63 and cytokeratin 5/6 as immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of poorly differentiated and undifferentiated carcinomas.

    Olaf Kaufmann;Ellen Fietze;Jörg Mengs;Manfred Dietel

  • Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry Testing: A Review of Analytical Assays and Clinical Implementation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

    Reinhard Büttner;John R Gosney;Birgit Guldhammer Skov;Julien Adam

  • Metabolite profiling of human colon carcinoma--deregulation of TCA cycle and amino acid turnover.

    Carsten Denkert;Jan Budczies;Wilko Weichert;Gert Wohlgemuth

  • Expression of thyroid transcription factor-1 in pulmonary and extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas and other neuroendocrine carcinomas of various primary sites.

    O Kaufmann;M Dietel

  • Harmonized PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for pulmonary squamous-cell and adenocarcinomas

    Andreas H Scheel;Manfred Dietel;Lukas C Heukamp;Korinna Jöhrens

  • Consensus for EGFR Mutation Testing in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a European Workshop

    Robert Pirker;Felix J F Herth;Keith M. Kerr;Martin Filipits

  • Thyroid transcription factor-1 is the superior immunohistochemical marker for pulmonary adenocarcinomas and large cell carcinomas compared to surfactant proteins A and B.

    Kaufmann O;Dietel M

  • ALCAM/CD166 is overexpressed in colorectal carcinoma and correlates with shortened patient survival.

    W Weichert;T Knösel;J Bellach;M Dietel

  • ESMO recommendations on the standard methods to detect NTRK fusions in daily practice and clinical research.

    Caterina Marchiò;Maurizio Scaltriti;Marc Ladanyi;Anthony J Iafrate

  • Expression of the nuclear export protein chromosomal region maintenance/exportin 1/Xpo1 is a prognostic factor in human ovarian cancer.

    Aurelia Noske;Wilko Weichert;Silvia Niesporek;Annika Röske

  • Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Virtual Microscopy Images: A Minimum-Model Approach

    Stephan Wienert;Daniel Heim;Kai Saeger;Albrecht Stenzinger

  • EML4-ALK testing in non-small cell carcinomas of the lung: a review with recommendations

    Erik Thunnissen;Lukas Bubendorf;Manfred Dietel;Göran Elmberger

  • The landscape of metastatic progression patterns across major human cancers.

    Jan Budczies;Moritz von Winterfeld;Frederick Klauschen;Michael Bockmayr

  • Prospective Validation of Immunological Infiltrate for Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer - A Substudy of the Neoadjuvant GeparQuinto Trial

    Yasmin Issa-Nummer;Silvia Darb-Esfahani;Sibylle Loibl;Georg Kunz

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten Denkert
Carsten Denkert Philipp University of Marburg
Wilko Weichert
Wilko Weichert Technical University of Munich
Glen Kristiansen
Glen Kristiansen University Hospital Bonn
Peter Schirmacher
Peter Schirmacher University Hospital Heidelberg
Albrecht Stenzinger
Albrecht Stenzinger Heidelberg University
Jalid Sehouli
Jalid Sehouli Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Carsten Stephan
Carsten Stephan Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael Hummel
Michael Hummel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Reinhard Büttner
Reinhard Büttner University Hospital Cologne
Christine Sers
Christine Sers Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in the medical field but considering alternative paths to becoming a physician? There are a variety of rewarding roles in healthcare that offer flexible online degree options. For those looking to enter nursing, researching the easiest rn program can help you find accessible routes into the profession, even if your academic background is not traditional.

If direct patient care isn’t your ideal fit, consider the growing field of healthcare administration. Earning a healthcare administration degree online accredited allows you to develop in-demand leadership and organizational skills while studying at your own pace.

Medical billing and coding is another crucial area, with top programs now offered remotely. Explore the best medical billing and coding schools online to find accredited options that may provide financial aid opportunities.

Many nursing schools have streamlined their admissions, and you may be wondering, do i need to take the teas test for lpn? Some programs no longer require standardized entrance exams, making entry even more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Manfred Dietel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles