World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 111 830 792 28 28 540 62551
Medicine 118 3980 3727 110 106 556 71976

Sherene Loi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sherene Loi between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sherene Loi published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 26 papers a year. Output peaked at 70 publications in 2020. 54 of the 572 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 70. Peak 70 publications in 2020. 2004: 7 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 48 publications 2018: 53 publications 2019: 69 publications 2020: 70 publications 2021: 55 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 53 publications
2004 2025

572 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sherene Loi: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 7
2005 18
2006 9
2007 9
2008 5
2009 7
2010 7
2011 16
2012 26
2013 28
2014 16
2015 34
2016 40
2017 48
2018 53
2019 69
2020 70
2021 55
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
2025 53
Total 572
Download as CSV

Sherene Loi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sherene Loi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 556 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 556
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Sherene Loi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sherene Loi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 118
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2017 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Sherene Loi is affiliated with the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on oncology, with significant contributions to advanced breast cancer therapies, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, and HER2/EGFR in cancer research. The main fields of study for Sherene Loi encompass medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with notable work in the subfields of oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cancer research, genetics, and immunology.

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Roberto Salgado, Seock-Ah Im, Peter Schmid, Hope S. Rugo, and Sibylle Loibl. Publications have appeared extensively in high-impact medical and scientific journals such as Cancer Research, Annals of Oncology, the Journal of Clinical Oncology, npj Breast Cancer, and Clinical Cancer Research.

Among the recent influential papers associated with Sherene Loi's research are:

  • Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death, 2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, 2020, The Lancet Oncology

The key topics explored in their work include advanced breast cancer therapies, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, HER2/EGFR pathways in cancer, breast cancer treatment studies, cancer treatment and pharmacology, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and cancer cells and metastasis.

Sherene Loi was awarded Fellowship of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2017.

Best Publications

  • The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014

    R. Salgado;C. Denkert;S. Demaria;N. Sirtaine

  • Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer: Understanding the Molecular Basis of Histologic Grade To Improve Prognosis

    Christos Sotiriou;Pratyaksha Wirapati;Sherene Loi;Adrian Harris

  • Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

    Massimo Cristofanilli;Nicholas C. Turner;Igor Bondarenko;Jungsil Ro

  • Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

    Nicholas C. Turner;Jungsil Ro;Fabrice André;Sherene Loi

  • Validation and Clinical Utility of a 70-Gene Prognostic Signature for Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer

    Marc Buyse;Sherene Loi;Laura van't Veer;Giuseppe Viale

  • Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: results from the FinHER trial

    S. Loi;S. Loi;S. Michiels;S. Michiels;R. Salgado;N. Sirtaine

  • Prognostic and Predictive Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Phase III Randomized Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trial in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Comparing the Addition of Docetaxel to Doxorubicin With Doxorubicin-Based Chemotherapy: BIG 02-98

    Sherene Loi;Nicolas Sirtaine;Fanny Piette;Roberto Salgado

  • Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

    Javier Cortes;David W Cescon;Hope S Rugo;Zbigniew Nowecki

  • Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Carboplatin in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive and Triple-Negative Primary Breast Cancers

    Carsten Denkert;Gunter von Minckwitz;Jan C. Brase;Bruno V. Sinn

  • CD4+ follicular helper T cell infiltration predicts breast cancer survival

    Chunyan Gu-Trantien;Sherene Loi;Soizic Garaud;Carole Equeter

  • Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series,

    Christine Desmedt;Fanny Piette;Sherene Loi;Yixin Wang

  • Tucatinib, Trastuzumab, and Capecitabine for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

    Rashmi K Murthy;Sherene Loi;Alicia Okines;Elisavet Paplomata

  • Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer

    Nicholas C Turner;Dennis J Slamon;Jungsil Ro;Igor Bondarenko

  • Single-cell profiling of breast cancer T cells reveals a tissue-resident memory subset associated with improved prognosis

    Peter Savas;Balaji Virassamy;Chengzhong Ye;Agus Salim;Agus Salim

  • Definition of Clinically Distinct Molecular Subtypes in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Carcinomas Through Genomic Grade

    Sherene Loi;Benjamin Haibe-Kains;Christine Desmedt;Françoise Lallemand

  • Insertion-and-deletion-derived tumour-specific neoantigens and the immunogenic phenotype: a pan-cancer analysis

    Samra Turajlic;Samra Turajlic;Kevin Litchfield;Hang Xu;Rachel Rosenthal

  • Clinical relevance of host immunity in breast cancer: from TILs to the clinic

    Peter Savas;Roberto Salgado;Carsten Denkert;Christos Sotiriou

  • Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death

    Oliver Kepp;Laura Senovilla;Ilio Vitale;Erika Vacchelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Christos Sotiriou
Christos Sotiriou Université Libre de Bruxelles
Roberto Salgado
Roberto Salgado Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Stefan Michiels
Stefan Michiels University of Paris-Saclay
Fabrice Andre
Fabrice Andre Institut Gustave Roussy
Sibylle Loibl
Sibylle Loibl Goethe University Frankfurt
Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Benjamin Haibe-Kains Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Martine Piccart
Martine Piccart Université Libre de Bruxelles
Carsten Denkert
Carsten Denkert Philipp University of Marburg
Sylvia Adams
Sylvia Adams New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring medical careers beyond traditional MD programs, there are several alternative pathways that offer flexibility and accessibility. For those with a non-nursing background who wish to quickly enter the healthcare workforce, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online provide streamlined routes to advanced nursing credentials.

Admission challenges can be a concern, but aspiring nurses have options. Some nursing programs with high acceptance rates allow students to start their education without highly competitive entry requirements, making the journey smoother for many applicants.

Not all healthcare careers require hands-on patient care. Growing demand for administrative professionals has increased the popularity of online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, which provide flexible and affordable options for those interested in medical office roles.

Additionally, if standardized testing is a barrier, you can find nursing programs without teas that remove common entrance exam requirements, helping more students start their careers in healthcare. These diverse online programs can open doors to a range of rewarding medical professions.

Best Scientists Citing Sherene Loi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles