World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
9321
World Ranking
6901
National Ranking
3743

Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 99 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research spans across the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a particular focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, and pharmacology.

The main topics covered in their work include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Additional areas of focus involve mental health research topics, mental health treatment and access, digital mental health interventions, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, and cannabis and cannabinoid research.

Frequent co-authors working with Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor are Michelle G. Craske, Elisabeth Akeman, Martin P. Paulus, Christopher R. Martell, and Robin L. Aupperle.

They have a significant publication record in several venues. The most frequent publication venues include the Journal of Mood and Anxiety Disorders, Trials, Clinical Psychological Science, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, and the Journal of Affective Disorders.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor are:

  • Neuroticism and Interpretive Bias as Risk Factors for Anxiety and Depression, 2020, Clinical Psychological Science
  • Five-year prospective neuroticism-stress effects on major depressive episodes: Primarily additive effects of the general neuroticism factor and stress, 2020, Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  • Depression Severity and Depression Stigma Among Students, 2020, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
  • Protocol for a randomized controlled trial examining multilevel prediction of response to behavioral activation and exposure-based therapy for generalized anxiety disorder, 2020, Trials
  • A Novel and Integrated Digitally Supported System of Care for Depression and Anxiety: Findings From an Open Trial, 2023, JMIR Mental Health

Best Publications

  • Anxiety disorders in older adults: a comprehensive review†

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Natalie Castriotta;Eric J. Lenze;Melinda A. Stanley

  • Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis.

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor

  • Psychological approaches in the treatment of specific phobias: a meta-analysis.

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Jonathan D. Horowitz;Mark B. Powers;Michael J. Telch

  • Prevalence and correlates of dating violence in a national sample of adolescents.

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Kenneth J. Ruggiero;Carla Kmett Danielson;Heidi S. Resnick

  • Is Reporting of Rape on the Rise? A Comparison of Women With Reported Versus Unreported Rape Experiences in the National Women’s Study-Replication

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Heidi S. Resnick;Jenna L. McCauley;Ananda B. Amstadter

  • Specificity of Rumination in Anxiety and Depression: A Multimodal Meta‐Analysis

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Kristin Naragon-Gainey;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor

  • Longitudinal treatment mediation of traditional cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety disorders.

    Joanna J. Arch;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Georg H. Eifert;Michelle G. Craske

  • A cognitive-behavioral treatment for irritable bowel syndrome using interoceptive exposure to visceral sensations

    Michelle G. Craske;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Jennifer Labus;Stephen Wu

  • Moderators and non-specific predictors of treatment outcome for anxiety disorders: A comparison of cognitive behavioral therapy to acceptance and commitment therapy.

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Joanna J. Arch;David Rosenfield;Michelle G. Craske

  • Diagnostic overlap of generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder in a primary care sample.

    D B A Tomislav Zbozinek;Raphael D. Rose;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Cathy Sherbourne

  • Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for social phobia: outcomes and moderators

    Michelle G. Craske;Andrea N. Niles;Lisa J. Burklund;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor

  • Reporting Rape in a National Sample of College Women

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Heidi S. Resnick;Ananda B. Amstadter;Jenna L. McCauley

  • Longitudinal investigation of the impact of anxiety and mood disorders in adolescence on subsequent substance use disorder onset and vice versa.

    Kate Wolitzky-Taylor;Lyuba Bobova;Richard E. Zinbarg;Susan Mineka

  • Differential habituation of fear and disgust during repeated exposure to threat-relevant stimuli in contamination-based OCD: an analogue study

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Jeffrey Willems;Jeffrey M. Lohr

  • Elevated responding to safe conditions as a specific risk factor for anxiety versus depressive disorders: evidence from a longitudinal investigation.

    Michelle G. Craske;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Susan Mineka;Richard Zinbarg

  • Chronic and episodic interpersonal stress as statistically unique predictors of depression in two samples of emerging adults.

    Suzanne Vrshek-Schallhorn;Catherine B. Stroud;Susan Mineka;Constance Hammen

  • Worry and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic synthesis of specificity to GAD

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Craig N. Sawchuk;Bethany G. Ciesielski

  • The Emotional Stroop Task and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: a Meta-Analysis

    Josh M. Cisler;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Thomas G. Adams;Kimberly A. Babson

  • Measurement of anxious traits: a contemporary review and synthesis

    Lisa S Elwood;Kate Wolitzky-Taylor;Bunmi O Olatunji

  • The state of personalized treatment for anxiety disorders: A systematic review of treatment moderators.

    Rebecca L. Schneider;Joanna J. Arch;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor

  • Testing a Hierarchical Model of Neuroticism and Its Cognitive Facets: Latent Structure and Prospective Prediction of First Onsets of Anxiety and Unipolar Mood Disorders During 3 Years in Late Adolescence

    Richard E. Zinbarg;Susan Mineka;Lyuba Bobova;Michelle G. Craske

Frequent Co-Authors

Michelle G. Craske
Michelle G. Craske University of California, Los Angeles
Richard E. Zinbarg
Richard E. Zinbarg Northwestern University
Susan Mineka
Susan Mineka Northwestern University
Bunmi O. Olatunji
Bunmi O. Olatunji Vanderbilt University
Joanna J. Arch
Joanna J. Arch University of Colorado Boulder
Peter Roy-Byrne
Peter Roy-Byrne University of Washington
Richard K. Ries
Richard K. Ries University of Washington
Michael J. Telch
Michael J. Telch The University of Texas at Austin
Emma K. Adam
Emma K. Adam Northwestern University
Constance Hammen
Constance Hammen University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities. Students can choose from specialized roles, such as those found in the school psychology career paths, where professionals support children and youth in educational settings and help address learning and behavioral issues.

Another emerging field is spiritual psychology careers, which blend traditional psychology with spiritual concepts to promote holistic well-being in clients seeking meaning and fulfillment. This specialty often attracts students interested in therapy beyond the clinical model.

For those fascinated by athletics and mental performance, the job outlook for sports psychologist continues to grow, thanks to increasing awareness about the importance of mental health in sports. Online degrees in sports psychology can prepare graduates for dynamic roles in this area.

It's also important to understand the distinction between a therapist vs clinical psychologist, as each pathway offers different training and licensure requirements. Understanding these differences can help you select the right degree and career trajectory to match your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor

Trending Scientists