World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frédérique Penault-Llorca

Frédérique Penault-Llorca

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
73928
World Ranking
5658
National Ranking
164

Frédérique Penault-Llorca publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédérique Penault-Llorca sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 694 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frédérique Penault-Llorca D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédérique Penault-Llorca sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frédérique Penault-Llorca is affiliated with the University of Clermont Auvergne in France. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Oncology, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Genetics.

Their work concentrates on several main research topics, including Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Frédérique Penault-Llorca include:

  • Giuseppe Curigliano
  • Fabrice André
  • Fátima Cardoso
  • Nadia Harbeck
  • Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm

Their publications have appeared frequently in scientific journals such as:

  • Annals of Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Cancers
  • ESMO Open
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Frédérique Penault-Llorca include:

  • 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5), 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Pathological and Clinical Landscape, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group, 2020, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer, 2023, Annals of Oncology

Best Publications

  • Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013

    A Goldhirsch;E P Winer;A S Coates;R D Gelber

  • The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014

    R. Salgado;C. Denkert;S. Demaria;N. Sirtaine

  • KRAS Mutation Status Is Predictive of Response to Cetuximab Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

    Astrid Lièvre;Jean-Baptiste Bachet;Delphine Le Corre;Valérie Boige

  • Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group

    Mitch Dowsett;Torsten O. Nielsen;Roger A’Hern;John Bartlett

  • KRAS Mutations As an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab

    Astrid Lièvre;Jean-Baptiste Bachet;Valérie Boige;Anne Cayre

  • Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis

    Wendy De Roock;Bart Claes;David Bernasconi;Jef De Schutter

  • Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    E. Senkus;S. Kyriakides;F. Penault-Llorca;P. Poortmans

  • 3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)

    F. Cardoso;A. Costa;E. Senkus;M. Aapro

  • Cancer cell–autonomous contribution of type I interferon signaling to the efficacy of chemotherapy

    Antonella Sistigu;Takahiro Yamazaki;Erika Vacchelli;Kariman Chaba

  • Routine molecular profiling of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a 1-year nationwide programme of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT)

    Fabrice Barlesi;Julien Mazieres;Jean-Philippe Merlio;Didier Debieuvre

  • Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group Part 2 TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors

    Shona Hendry;Roberto Salgado;Thomas Gevaert;Prudence A. Russell;Prudence A. Russell

  • Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR Status in Determining Benefit From Cetuximab Therapy in Wild-Type KRAS Metastatic Colon Cancer

    Pierre Laurent-Puig;Anne Cayre;Gilles Manceau;Emmanuel Buc

  • Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in combination with sequential nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy versus placebo and chemotherapy in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion031): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

    Elizabeth A Mittendorf;Hong Zhang;Carlos H Barrios;Shigehira Saji

  • Prediction of BRCA1 Status in Patients with Breast Cancer Using Estrogen Receptor and Basal Phenotype

    Sunil R. Lakhani;Jorge S. Reis-Filho;Laura Fulford;Frederique Penault-Llorca

  • Assessing Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immunooncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 1: Assessing the Host Immune Response, TILs in Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, Metastatic Tumor Deposits and Areas for Further Research

    Shona Hendry;Roberto Salgado;Thomas Gevaert;Prudence A. Russell;Prudence A. Russell

  • ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)

    F. Cardoso;A. Costa;L. Norton;E. Senkus

  • ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer†

    A. Gennari;F. André;C.H. Barrios;J. Cortés

  • Impact of Fc{gamma}RIIa-Fc{gamma}RIIIa polymorphisms and KRAS mutations on the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan.

    Frédéric Bibeau;Evelyne Lopez-Crapez;Frédéric Di Fiore;Simon Thezenas

  • Trastuzumab-based treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity mechanism?

    L. Arnould;M. Gelly;F. Penault-Llorca;L. Benoit

  • An International Ki67 Reproducibility Study

    Mei Yin C Polley;Samuel C Y Leung;Lisa M. McShane;Dongxia Gao

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves-Jean Bignon
Yves-Jean Bignon Centre Jean Perrin
Giuseppe Viale
Giuseppe Viale University of Milan
Jocelyne Jacquemier
Jocelyne Jacquemier Grenoble Alpes University
Fabrice Andre
Fabrice Andre Institut Gustave Roussy
Roberto Salgado
Roberto Salgado Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Torsten O. Nielsen
Torsten O. Nielsen University of British Columbia
Giuseppe Curigliano
Giuseppe Curigliano University of Milan
Carsten Denkert
Carsten Denkert Philipp University of Marburg
Pierre Laurent-Puig
Pierre Laurent-Puig Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to numerous online degrees and healthcare career pathways. Whether you’re looking to support mental health or take on leadership roles in healthcare, accredited online programs offer flexibility and accessibility.

For those interested in mental health, online pmhnp programs provide a direct route to advanced practice as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. If you’re interested in healthcare management, consider pursuing a bachelors in health administration, which equips you with foundational knowledge in healthcare operations, policy, and leadership.

Many professionals enhance their qualifications with affordable mha online programs, designed for those who wish to advance into executive or administrative roles. Alternatively, nurses seeking to reach the highest level of clinical practice can enroll in the best online bsn to dnp programs, combining research, leadership, and specialized clinical training for top-tier positions.

With these flexible, accredited options, you can tailor your educational journey to your career goals in the rapidly evolving healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Frédérique Penault-Llorca

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles