World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frédérique Penault-Llorca

Frédérique Penault-Llorca

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 109 5657 5311 165 156 694 73928

Frédérique Penault-Llorca publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frédérique Penault-Llorca between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frédérique Penault-Llorca published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 23.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2017. 25 of the 749 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2017. 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 31 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 38 publications 2009: 41 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 43 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 38 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
1994 2025

749 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frédérique Penault-Llorca: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 5
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 13
1999 7
2000 8
2001 5
2002 11
2003 31
2004 17
2005 23
2006 24
2007 23
2008 38
2009 41
2010 21
2011 24
2012 43
2013 41
2014 34
2015 37
2016 38
2017 47
2018 36
2019 30
2020 39
2021 38
2022 22
2023 22
2024 11
2025 14
Total 749
Download as CSV

Frédérique Penault-Llorca publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédérique Penault-Llorca sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 694 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 694
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Frédérique Penault-Llorca D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédérique Penault-Llorca sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 109
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Frédérique Penault-Llorca is affiliated with the University of Clermont Auvergne in France. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Oncology, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Genetics.

Their work concentrates on several main research topics, including Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Frédérique Penault-Llorca include:

  • Giuseppe Curigliano
  • Fabrice André
  • Fátima Cardoso
  • Nadia Harbeck
  • Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm

Their publications have appeared frequently in scientific journals such as:

  • Annals of Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Cancers
  • ESMO Open
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Frédérique Penault-Llorca include:

  • 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5), 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Pathological and Clinical Landscape, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group, 2020, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer, 2023, Annals of Oncology

Best Publications

  • Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013

    A Goldhirsch;E P Winer;A S Coates;R D Gelber

  • The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014

    R. Salgado;C. Denkert;S. Demaria;N. Sirtaine

  • KRAS Mutation Status Is Predictive of Response to Cetuximab Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

    Astrid Lièvre;Jean-Baptiste Bachet;Delphine Le Corre;Valérie Boige

  • Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group

    Mitch Dowsett;Torsten O. Nielsen;Roger A’Hern;John Bartlett

  • KRAS Mutations As an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab

    Astrid Lièvre;Jean-Baptiste Bachet;Valérie Boige;Anne Cayre

  • Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis

    Wendy De Roock;Bart Claes;David Bernasconi;Jef De Schutter

  • Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    E. Senkus;S. Kyriakides;F. Penault-Llorca;P. Poortmans

  • 3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)

    F. Cardoso;A. Costa;E. Senkus;M. Aapro

  • Cancer cell–autonomous contribution of type I interferon signaling to the efficacy of chemotherapy

    Antonella Sistigu;Takahiro Yamazaki;Erika Vacchelli;Kariman Chaba

  • Routine molecular profiling of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a 1-year nationwide programme of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT)

    Fabrice Barlesi;Julien Mazieres;Jean-Philippe Merlio;Didier Debieuvre

  • Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group Part 2 TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors

    Shona Hendry;Roberto Salgado;Thomas Gevaert;Prudence A. Russell;Prudence A. Russell

  • Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR Status in Determining Benefit From Cetuximab Therapy in Wild-Type KRAS Metastatic Colon Cancer

    Pierre Laurent-Puig;Anne Cayre;Gilles Manceau;Emmanuel Buc

  • Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in combination with sequential nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy versus placebo and chemotherapy in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion031): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

    Elizabeth A Mittendorf;Hong Zhang;Carlos H Barrios;Shigehira Saji

  • Prediction of BRCA1 Status in Patients with Breast Cancer Using Estrogen Receptor and Basal Phenotype

    Sunil R. Lakhani;Jorge S. Reis-Filho;Laura Fulford;Frederique Penault-Llorca

  • Assessing Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immunooncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 1: Assessing the Host Immune Response, TILs in Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, Metastatic Tumor Deposits and Areas for Further Research

    Shona Hendry;Roberto Salgado;Thomas Gevaert;Prudence A. Russell;Prudence A. Russell

  • ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)

    F. Cardoso;A. Costa;L. Norton;E. Senkus

  • ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer†

    A. Gennari;F. André;C.H. Barrios;J. Cortés

  • Impact of Fc{gamma}RIIa-Fc{gamma}RIIIa polymorphisms and KRAS mutations on the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan.

    Frédéric Bibeau;Evelyne Lopez-Crapez;Frédéric Di Fiore;Simon Thezenas

  • Trastuzumab-based treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity mechanism?

    L. Arnould;M. Gelly;F. Penault-Llorca;L. Benoit

  • An International Ki67 Reproducibility Study

    Mei Yin C Polley;Samuel C Y Leung;Lisa M. McShane;Dongxia Gao

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves-Jean Bignon
Yves-Jean Bignon Centre Jean Perrin
Giuseppe Viale
Giuseppe Viale University of Milan
Jocelyne Jacquemier
Jocelyne Jacquemier Grenoble Alpes University
Fabrice Andre
Fabrice Andre Institut Gustave Roussy
Roberto Salgado
Roberto Salgado Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Torsten O. Nielsen
Torsten O. Nielsen University of British Columbia
Giuseppe Curigliano
Giuseppe Curigliano University of Milan
Carsten Denkert
Carsten Denkert Philipp University of Marburg
Pierre Laurent-Puig
Pierre Laurent-Puig Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to numerous online degrees and healthcare career pathways. Whether you’re looking to support mental health or take on leadership roles in healthcare, accredited online programs offer flexibility and accessibility.

For those interested in mental health, online pmhnp programs provide a direct route to advanced practice as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. If you’re interested in healthcare management, consider pursuing a bachelors in health administration, which equips you with foundational knowledge in healthcare operations, policy, and leadership.

Many professionals enhance their qualifications with affordable mha online programs, designed for those who wish to advance into executive or administrative roles. Alternatively, nurses seeking to reach the highest level of clinical practice can enroll in the best online bsn to dnp programs, combining research, leadership, and specialized clinical training for top-tier positions.

With these flexible, accredited options, you can tailor your educational journey to your career goals in the rapidly evolving healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Frédérique Penault-Llorca

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles