World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Albrecht Stenzinger

Albrecht Stenzinger

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
26551
World Ranking
17012
National Ranking
891

Albrecht Stenzinger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albrecht Stenzinger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 459 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Albrecht Stenzinger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albrecht Stenzinger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Albrecht Stenzinger is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has a substantial record of research contributions primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work encompasses over 650 publications in Medicine and nearly 300 in Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research is focused on several key subfields, including:

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cancer Research
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Stenzinger's main topics of work cover a range of oncological and molecular biology areas, specifically:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

The scientist has published frequently in a number of journals, with the most common venues including:

  • Annals of Oncology (17 publications)
  • Cancer Research (15 publications)
  • Die Pathologie (15 publications)
  • Genes Chromosomes and Cancer (13 publications)
  • ESMO Open (12 publications)

Among Stenzinger's notable recent papers are:

  • Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group, 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker in Solid Tumors, 2020, Cancer Discovery
  • SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas, 2021, Nature Metabolism
  • Biliary tract cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, 2022, Annals of Oncology
  • Sarcoma classification by DNA methylation profiling, 2021, Nature Communications

Stenzinger has collaborated extensively with a group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Daniel Kazdal (93 joint works)
  • Peter Schirmacher (78 joint works)
  • Petros Christopoulos (78 joint works)
  • Stefan Fröhling (67 joint works)
  • Michael Thomas (65 joint works)

Best Publications

  • Development of tumor mutation burden as an immunotherapy biomarker: utility for the oncology clinic

    T.A. Chan;M. Yarchoan;E. Jaffee;C. Swanton

  • Identification of a population of blood circulating tumor cells from breast cancer patients that initiates metastasis in a xenograft assay

    Irène Baccelli;Andreas Schneeweiss;Sabine Riethdorf;Albrecht Stenzinger

  • Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group.

    F. Mosele;J. Remon;J. Mateo;C. B. Westphalen

  • The Novel Histologic International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Classification System of Lung Adenocarcinoma Is a Stage-Independent Predictor of Survival

    Arne Warth;Thomas Muley;Michael Meister;Albrecht Stenzinger

  • Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker in Solid Tumors.

    Dan Sha;Zhaohui Jin;Jan Budczies;Klaus Kluck

  • SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas.

    Janis A Müller;Rüdiger Groß;Carina Conzelmann;Jana Krüger

  • Establishing guidelines to harmonize tumor mutational burden (TMB): in silico assessment of variation in TMB quantification across diagnostic platforms: phase I of the Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project.

    Diana M Merino;Lisa M McShane;David Fabrizio;Vincent Funari

  • Sarcoma classification by DNA methylation profiling

    Christian Koelsche;Christian Koelsche;Daniel Schrimpf;Daniel Schrimpf;Damian Stichel;Martin Sill

  • Accurate and efficient detection of gene fusions from RNA sequencing data.

    Sebastian Uhrig;Julia Ellermann;Tatjana Walther;Pauline Burkhardt;Pauline Burkhardt

  • Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Virtual Microscopy Images: A Minimum-Model Approach

    Stephan Wienert;Daniel Heim;Kai Saeger;Albrecht Stenzinger

  • The landscape of metastatic progression patterns across major human cancers.

    Jan Budczies;Moritz von Winterfeld;Frederick Klauschen;Michael Bockmayr

  • Prognostic impact of tumour-infiltrating immune cells on biliary tract cancer

    B Goeppert;L Frauenschuh;M Zucknick;A Stenzinger

  • Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment

    Patrick Schelb;Simon Kohl;Jan Philipp Radtke;Jan Philipp Radtke;Manuel Wiesenfarth

  • BRAFV600E mutant protein is expressed in cells of variable maturation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

    Felix Sahm;Felix Sahm;David Capper;David Capper;Matthias Preusser;Jochen Meyer

  • Tumor mutational burden standardization initiatives: Recommendations for consistent tumor mutational burden assessment in clinical samples to guide immunotherapy treatment decisions.

    Albrecht Stenzinger;Jeffrey D. Allen;Jörg Maas;Mark D. Stewart

  • Increased microtubule assembly rates influence chromosomal instability in colorectal cancer cells

    Norman Ertych;Ailine Stolz;Albrecht Stenzinger;Wilko Weichert

  • NRG1 Fusions in KRAS Wild-Type Pancreatic Cancer

    Christoph Heining;Peter Horak;Sebastian Uhrig;Paula L Codo

  • CYP3A5 mediates basal and acquired therapy resistance in different subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

    Elisa M. Noll;Christian Eisen;Albrecht Stenzinger;Albrecht Stenzinger;Elisa Espinet

  • Comprehensive Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis for Guiding Therapeutic Decisions in Patients with Rare Cancers

    Peter Horak;Christoph Heining;Simon Kreutzfeldt;Barbara Hutter

  • Three molecular pathways model colorectal carcinogenesis in Lynch syndrome

    Aysel Ahadova;Aysel Ahadova;Aysel Ahadova;Richard Gallon;Johannes Gebert;Johannes Gebert;Johannes Gebert;Alexej Ballhausen;Alexej Ballhausen;Alexej Ballhausen

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Schirmacher
Peter Schirmacher University Hospital Heidelberg
Wilko Weichert
Wilko Weichert Technical University of Munich
Roland Penzel
Roland Penzel University Hospital Heidelberg
Michael Thomas
Michael Thomas Heidelberg University
Hanno Glimm
Hanno Glimm TU Dresden
Carsten Denkert
Carsten Denkert Philipp University of Marburg
Manfred Dietel
Manfred Dietel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Benedikt Brors
Benedikt Brors German Cancer Research Center
Barbara Hutter
Barbara Hutter German Cancer Research Center
Holger Sültmann
Holger Sültmann German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Medicine doesn't always mean you have to follow the traditional MD route. Numerous online degrees offer entry into related healthcare fields and provide flexible study options for those balancing work or family commitments.

For example, if you're interested in disease prevention and healthy lifestyles, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can open doors to roles in clinical nutrition, public health, and wellness coaching.

Management positions in hospitals and healthcare systems are increasingly requiring specialized credentials. Explore a cahme accredited online mha programs list to identify reputable programs for earning a Master of Healthcare Administration entirely online.

Nurses looking to advance their education can benefit from online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, allowing working RNs to obtain a bachelor's degree without in-person clinical requirements. For advanced practice, consider the shortest msn to dnp program to quickly earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

No matter your interests, online programs offer flexible alternatives in allied health, administration, and nursing, helping you find the right fit for your healthcare career path.

Best Scientists Citing Albrecht Stenzinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles