World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
14991
World Ranking
7123
National Ranking
521

Matthias Kloor publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Kloor sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 323 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Matthias Kloor D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Kloor sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias Kloor is affiliated with the University Hospital Heidelberg in Germany and has an extensive publication record in the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research primarily focuses on oncology, pathology, forensic medicine, cancer research, molecular biology, and surgery.

Their work covers several main topics, notably genetic factors in colorectal cancer, cancer genomics and diagnostics, colorectal cancer screening and detection, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, colorectal cancer treatments and studies, multiple and secondary primary cancers, and colorectal and anal carcinomas.

Matthias Kloor has contributed to various research publications, including:

  • European guidelines from the EHTG and ESCP for Lynch syndrome: an updated third edition of the Mallorca guidelines based on gene and gender (2020), published in British Journal of Surgery
  • A Frameshift Peptide Neoantigen-Based Vaccine for Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancers: A Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial (2020), published in Clinical Cancer Research
  • The shared frameshift mutation landscape of microsatellite-unstable cancers suggests immunoediting during tumor evolution (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • Variation in the risk of colorectal cancer in families with Lynch syndrome: a retrospective cohort study (2021), published in The Lancet Oncology
  • Recurrent Frameshift Neoantigen Vaccine Elicits Protective Immunity With Reduced Tumor Burden and Improved Overall Survival in a Lynch Syndrome Mouse Model (2021), published in Gastroenterology

Kloor collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Aysel Ahadova (42 co-authored works)
  • Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz (36 co-authored works)
  • Hendrik Bläker (25 co-authored works)
  • Hermann Brenner (21 co-authored works)
  • Michael Hoffmeister (21 co-authored works)

Their research has been published in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (11 publications)
  • International Journal of Cancer (8 publications)
  • Gastroenterology (5 publications)
  • Frontiers in Oncology (4 publications)
  • Cancer Research (4 publications)

The scope of Matthias Kloor's work includes genetics and molecular mechanisms behind colorectal cancer, development of immunotherapeutic approaches, and diagnostic strategies for cancer detection and treatment. Their involvement in these complex topics contributes to ongoing efforts in understanding and managing colorectal and related cancers.

Best Publications

  • Potential of fecal microbiota for early‐stage detection of colorectal cancer

    Georg Zeller;Julien Tap;Anita Y Voigt;Shinichi Sunagawa

  • Localization and Density of Immune Cells in the Invasive Margin of Human Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Are Prognostic for Response to Chemotherapy

    Niels Halama;Sara Michel;Matthias Kloor;Inka Zoernig

  • Application of a 5-tiered scheme for standardized classification of 2,360 unique mismatch repair gene variants in the InSiGHT locus-specific database

    Bryony A Thompson;Bryony A Thompson;Amanda B Spurdle;John-Paul Plazzer;Marc S Greenblatt

  • Immune Response Against Frameshift-Induced Neopeptides in HNPCC Patients and Healthy HNPCC Mutation Carriers

    Yvette Schwitalle;Matthias Kloor;Susanne Eiermann;Michael Linnebacher

  • Natural killer cells are scarce in colorectal carcinoma tissue despite high levels of chemokines and cytokines.

    Niels Halama;Monika Braun;Christoph Kahlert;Anna Spille

  • Risk of colorectal and endometrial cancers in EPCAM deletion-positive Lynch syndrome: a cohort study

    Marlies J E Kempers;Roland P Kuiper;Charlotte W Ockeloen;Pierre O Chappuis

  • Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer is associated with local lymphocyte infiltration and low frequency of distant metastases

    A. Buckowitz;H. P. Knaebel;A. Benner;H. Bläker

  • Immune Escape and Survival Mechanisms in Circulating Tumor Cells of Colorectal Cancer

    Gunnar Steinert;Sebastian Schölch;Thomas Niemietz;Naoki Iwata

  • The Immune Biology of Microsatellite-Unstable Cancer

    Matthias Kloor;Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz

  • Genotype-Phenotype Comparison of German MLH1 and MSH2 Mutation Carriers Clinically Affected With Lynch Syndrome: A Report by the German HNPCC Consortium

    Timm Goecke;Karsten Schulmann;Christoph Engel;Elke Holinski-Feder

  • Three molecular pathways model colorectal carcinogenesis in Lynch syndrome

    Aysel Ahadova;Aysel Ahadova;Aysel Ahadova;Richard Gallon;Johannes Gebert;Johannes Gebert;Johannes Gebert;Alexej Ballhausen;Alexej Ballhausen;Alexej Ballhausen

  • Recurrence and Variability of Germline EPCAM Deletions in Lynch Syndrome

    Roland P. Kuiper;Lisenka E. L. M. Vissers;Ramprasath Venkatachalam;Danielle Bodmer

  • Immunoselective Pressure and Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I Antigen Machinery Defects in Microsatellite Unstable Colorectal Cancers

    Matthias Kloor;Christina Becker;Axel Benner;Stefan M. Woerner

  • Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal tumors display a diversity of T cell receptor sequences that differ from the T cells in adjacent mucosal tissue.

    Anna M. Sherwood;Ryan O. Emerson;Dominique Scherer;Nina Habermann

  • Genetic evolution of T-cell resistance in the course of melanoma progression

    Antje Sucker;Fang Zhao;Birgit Real;Christina Heeke

  • Overexpression of ZEB2 at the Invasion Front of Colorectal Cancer Is an Independent Prognostic Marker and Regulates Tumor Invasion In Vitro

    Christoph Kahlert;Saleh Lahes;Praveen Radhakrishnan;Shamik Dutta

  • European guidelines from the EHTG and ESCP for Lynch syndrome: an updated third edition of the Mallorca guidelines based on gene and gender

    Toni T. Seppälä;Toni T. Seppälä;A. Latchford;A. Latchford;I. Negoi;A. Sampaio Soares

  • Immune evasion of microsatellite unstable colorectal cancers.

    Matthias Kloor;Sara Michel;Sara Michel;Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz;Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz

  • Colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas are genetically closely related to colorectal adenocarcinomas

    Moritz Jesinghaus;Björn Konukiewitz;Gisela Keller;Matthias Kloor

  • Somatic Hypermethylation of MSH2 Is a Frequent Event in Lynch Syndrome Colorectal Cancers

    Takeshi Nagasaka;Jennifer Rhees;Matthias Kloor;Johannes Gebert

Frequent Co-Authors

Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz Heidelberg University
Jenny Chang-Claude
Jenny Chang-Claude German Cancer Research Center
Peter Schirmacher
Peter Schirmacher University Hospital Heidelberg
Michael Hoffmeister
Michael Hoffmeister German Cancer Research Center
Hermann Brenner
Hermann Brenner German Cancer Research Center
Christoph Engel
Christoph Engel Leipzig University
Axel Benner
Axel Benner German Cancer Research Center
Albrecht Stenzinger
Albrecht Stenzinger Heidelberg University
Wolff Schmiegel
Wolff Schmiegel Ruhr University Bochum
Jürgen Weitz
Jürgen Weitz TU Dresden

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry unlocks diverse career opportunities, many of which can be accessed through flexible online programs. For those interested in nutrition, a holistic nutrition degree can provide a valuable foundation for roles in wellness, community health, or private practice.

Students looking to enter the management side of healthcare may consider pursuing the cheapest online mba healthcare management program. This pathway prepares graduates for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and healthcare startups while helping to minimize tuition costs.

Alternatively, becoming a professional coder is a growing field for those with an eye for detail. Understanding the medical coding certification differences is critical, as certifications can impact job prospects and potential salaries.

If you’re curious about job stability and income, the medical.coder salary continues to be competitive, reflecting the healthcare industry's ongoing need for accurate record-keeping and compliance.

Whether you pursue advanced healthcare management, nutrition, or medical coding, the field offers multiple online pathways tailored to your career aspirations and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Kloor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles