World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz

Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
29717
World Ranking
9016
National Ranking
506

Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 367 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany, contributing extensively to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research primarily focuses on genetic factors in colorectal cancer, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and colorectal cancer screening and detection. Additional topics in their work include cervical cancer and HPV research, colorectal cancer treatments and studies, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, and multiple and secondary primary cancers.

The scientist has published numerous papers, with several appearing in prominent venues. Notable publications include:

  • European guidelines from the EHTG and ESCP for Lynch syndrome: an updated third edition of the Mallorca guidelines based on gene and gender, 2020, British Journal of Surgery
  • A Frameshift Peptide Neoantigen-Based Vaccine for Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancers: A Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial, 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • The shared frameshift mutation landscape of microsatellite-unstable cancers suggests immunoediting during tumor evolution, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Recurrent Frameshift Neoantigen Vaccine Elicits Protective Immunity With Reduced Tumor Burden and Improved Overall Survival in a Lynch Syndrome Mouse Model, 2021, Gastroenterology
  • Associations of Pathogenic Variants in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 With Risk of Colorectal Adenomas and Tumors and With Somatic Mutations in Patients With Lynch Syndrome, 2020, Gastroenterology

Frequent coauthors with whom the scientist has collaborated include Matthias Kloor, Aysel Ahadova, Robert Hüneburg, Toni T. Seppälä, and Jukka-Pekka Mecklin. This network of collaborators has contributed to substantial progress in related fields.

Publications by Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz have appeared most often in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Gastroenterology
  • International Journal of Cancer
  • Cancers
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Their research areas are further broken down into subfields such as pathology and forensic medicine, oncology, cancer research, epidemiology, and molecular biology. This multidisciplinary approach facilitates comprehensive investigations into the molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of cancer and related diseases.

Best Publications

  • Overexpression of p16INK4A as a specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri

    Ruediger Klaes;Tibor Friedrich;Dimitry Spitkovsky;Ruediger Ridder

  • Potential of fecal microbiota for early‐stage detection of colorectal cancer

    Georg Zeller;Julien Tap;Anita Y Voigt;Shinichi Sunagawa

  • Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases.

    F. Xavier Bosch;Thomas R. Broker;David Forman;Anna Barbara Moscicki

  • p16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

    Rüdiger Klaes;Axel Benner;Tibor Friedrich;Rüdiger Ridder

  • Systematic Review of Genomic Integration Sites of Human Papillomavirus Genomes in Epithelial Dysplasia and Invasive Cancer of the Female Lower Genital Tract

    Nicolas Wentzensen;Svetlana Vinokurova;Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz

  • Detection of high-risk cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer by amplification of transcripts derived from integrated papillomavirus oncogenes.

    Ruediger Klaes;Stefan M. Woerner;Ruediger Ridder;Nicolas Wentzensen

  • Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database

    Mev Dominguez-Valentin;Julian R. Sampson;Toni T. Seppälä;Sanne W. ten Broeke

  • Type-dependent integration frequency of human papillomavirus genomes in cervical lesions

    Svetlana Vinokurova;Nicolas Wentzensen;Irene Kraus;Ruediger Klaes

  • Immune Response Against Frameshift-Induced Neopeptides in HNPCC Patients and Healthy HNPCC Mutation Carriers

    Yvette Schwitalle;Matthias Kloor;Susanne Eiermann;Michael Linnebacher

  • Correlation of Modified Human Papilloma Virus Early Gene Expression with Altered Growth Properties in C4-1 Cervical Carcinoma Cells

    Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz;Tilman Oltersdorf;Elisabeth Schwarz;Lutz Gissmann

  • Risks of Less Common Cancers in Proven Mutation Carriers With Lynch Syndrome

    Christoph Engel;Markus Loeffler;Verena Steinke;Nils Rahner

  • Lower Incidence of Colorectal Cancer and Later Age of Disease Onset in 27 Families With Pathogenic MSH6 Germline Mutations Compared With Families With MLH1 or MSH2 Mutations: The German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium

    Jens Plaschke;Christoph Engel;Stefan Krüger;Elke Holinski-Feder

  • A systematic review of humoral immune responses against tumor antigens

    Miriam Reuschenbach;Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz;Nicolas Wentzensen

  • Inhibition of tumorigenicity of cervical cancer cells in nude mice by HPV e6-e7 anti-sense RNA

    Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz;Claudia Rittmüller;Harald Zur Hausen;Matthias dürst

  • An efficient and versatile system for acute and chronic modulation of renal tubular function in transgenic mice

    Milena Traykova-Brauch;Kai Schönig;Oliver Greiner;Tewfik Miloud

  • Mutational activation of the β-catenin proto-oncogene is a common event in the development of Wilms' tumors

    Robert Koesters;Ruediger Ridder;Annette Kopp-Schneider;David Betts

  • Screening for Cervical Cancer Precursors With p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology: Results of the PALMS Study

    Hans Ikenberg;Christine Bergeron;Dietmar Schmidt;Henrik Griesser

  • Glucocorticoid Cotreatment Induces Apoptosis Resistance toward Cancer Therapy in Carcinomas

    Ingrid Herr;Esat Ucur;Esat Ucur;Kerstin Herzer;Stella Okouoyo;Stella Okouoyo

  • Biomarkers in Cervical Cancer Screening

    Nicolas Wentzensen;Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz

  • Frameshift peptide‐derived T‐cell epitopes: A source of novel tumor‐specific antigens

    Michael Linnebacher;Johannes Gebert;Wolfgang Rudy;Stefan Woerner

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Kloor
Matthias Kloor University Hospital Heidelberg
Christoph Engel
Christoph Engel Leipzig University
Axel Benner
Axel Benner German Cancer Research Center
Jürgen Weitz
Jürgen Weitz TU Dresden
Christian Herfarth
Christian Herfarth Heidelberg University
Peer Bork
Peer Bork European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Nicolas Wentzensen
Nicolas Wentzensen National Institutes of Health
Peter Schirmacher
Peter Schirmacher University Hospital Heidelberg
Hans F. A. Vasen
Hans F. A. Vasen Leiden University
Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
Jukka-Pekka Mecklin University of Jyväskylä

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary online degrees can open new doors for students interested in the medical field. One increasingly popular option is pursuing the fastest post master's pmhnp programs, which can quickly prepare nurses for advanced psychiatric care roles. These accelerated tracks are ideal for those wanting to specialize in mental health.

For those drawn to leadership and management, a health care administration online degree provides a direct pathway into managing hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations. Aspiring executives may also consider a master's in healthcare administration online to deepen their expertise in policy, finance, and operations while studying flexibly.

Nurses aiming for the highest clinical practice roles can opt for the best online dnp programs, a practical option to expand leadership and research skills. These programs support career advancement and improved patient care, often with a flexible online format. Choosing the right online pathway can help you tailor your educational journey and advance your medical career efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles