World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
32
Citations
11096
World Ranking
963
National Ranking
47

Hans-Dieter Klingemann publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Dieter Klingemann sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 221 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Hans-Dieter Klingemann D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Dieter Klingemann sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans-Dieter Klingemann is affiliated with the Social Science Research Center Berlin in Germany. Their research is situated mainly within the Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Political Science and International Relations, and Sociology and Political Science as subfields.

Their work addresses multiple topics, including:

  • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • German legal, social, and political studies
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Political Conflict and Governance
  • Religion and Society Interactions
  • Public Administration and Political Analysis

Hans-Dieter Klingemann has collaborated with several researchers across different projects. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Ebru Ş. Canan-Sokullu
  • Dirk Berg-Schlosser
  • Ursula Hoffmann-Lange
  • Ursula van Beek
  • Bernhard Weßels

The scholar's publication record extends across nine works in the broader Social Sciences, with specific contributions to Political Science and International Relations and the intersection of Sociology and Political Science.

Klingemann's research interests include analysis of political systems and voting behavior, explorations of populist and right-wing political movements, and the relationship between religion and societal structures in Germany. Their work also examines aspects of public administration and political governance, contributing to a nuanced understanding of political conflict and participation.

Best Publications

  • Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998

    Ian Budge;Hans-Dieter Klingemann;Andrea Volkens;Judith Bara

  • Mapping Policy Preferences

    Unknown

  • 7 The Left-Right Schema

    Dieter Fuchs;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Mapping policy preferences II : estimates for parties, electors, and governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003

    Unknown

  • Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis

    Unknown

  • Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness.

    Ronald Inglehart;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Mapping Policy Preferences ii

    Unknown

  • The Oxford handbook of political behavior

    Russell J. Dalton;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts: Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts

    Andrea Volkens;Judith Bara;Ian Budge;Michael D. McDonald

  • Remembering the bad old days: Human rights, economic conditions, and democratic performance in transitional regimes

    Unknown

  • The Civic Culture Transformed

    Russell Dalton;Christian Welzel

  • Political consequences of Germany's mixed-member system: Personalization at the grass-roots?

    Unknown

  • Citizens and the State: A Changing Relationship?

    Unknown

  • The policy impact of party programmes and government declarations in the Federal Republic of Germany

    Unknown

  • Party Positions and Voter Orientations

    Unknown

  • The Civic Culture Transformed: Dissatisfied Democrats

    Unknown

  • Citizens and the State: A Relationship Transformed

    Unknown

  • Finally! Comparative Over-Time Mapping of Party Policy Movement

    Unknown

  • Wahlen und politischer Prozess : Analysen aus Anlaß der Bundestagswahl 1983

    Hans-Dieter Klingemann;Max Kaase

  • Manifesto Coding Instructions

    Unknown

  • The Question of Legitimacy in Contemporary Democracies

    Ursula van Beek;Dieter Fuchs;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Globalization, Populism and Legitimacy in Contemporary Democracy

    Dieter Fuchs;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Federal Parliament Election 1969 (Pre-Election Investigation, September 1969 und Follow-Up Survey, October - November 1969)

    Hans-Dieter Klingemann;Franz U. Pappi

  • The Post Communist Citizen East Germany 1992

    Dieter Fuchs;Hans-Dieter Klingemann;Edeltraud Roller;Bernhard Weßels

  • Political Ideology II (Representative Survey 1980)

    Klaus R. Allerbeck;Max Kaase;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Political Ideology II (Panel Study 1980, 2nd Wave)

    Klaus R. Allerbeck;Max Kaase;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Election Study 1987 (Panel: 1st Wave, September 1986)

    Manfred Berger;Wolfgang G. Gibowski;Max Kaase;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Election Study 1987 (Panel: 3rd Wave, February 1987)

    Manfred Berger;Wolfgang G. Gibowski;Max Kaase;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Election Study 1987 (Panel: 2nd Wave, January 1987)

    Manfred Berger;Wolfgang G. Gibowski;Max Kaase;Hans-Dieter Klingemann

  • Preface and introduction

    Hans-Dieter Klingemann;Dieter Fuchs

  • Post-Election Study on the Federal Parliament Election 1994

    Mannheim Zuma;Matthias Jung;Dieter Roth;Manfred Berger

  • State Election in Hesse 1970 (Follow-Up Survey)

    Hans-Dieter Klingemann;Franz U. Pappi

  • Comparative Election Study 1990: Policy Options on German Unity

    Max Kaase;Hans-Dieter Klingemann;Manfred Küchler;Franz U. Pappi

  • Pre-Election Study on the Federal Parliament Election 1994: Policy and Party Preference

    Franz U. Pappi;Manfred Berger;Matthias Jung;Dieter Roth

  • Post-election Surveys on Federal Parliament Election 1949-2005 (Cumulated Variable Selection)

    Erich Reigrotzki;Erwin K. Scheuch;Rudolf Wildenmann

  • The Political Action Panel Study

    Klaus R. Allerbeck;Samuel H. Barnes;Jan W. van Deth;Barbara G. Farah

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald Inglehart
Ronald Inglehart University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
M. Kent Jennings
M. Kent Jennings University of California, Santa Barbara
Jan W. van Deth
Jan W. van Deth University of Mannheim
Jacques J.A. Thomassen
Jacques J.A. Thomassen University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens up numerous pathways for further education and professional growth. Many students find value in interdisciplinary studies, such as pursuing online MA in history programs to deepen their understanding of political movements and global events. These programs can complement your political science background and expand your academic expertise.

If you’re eager to enhance your qualifications quickly, you might consider the quickest masters degree online options. These accelerated programs allow you to advance your education and enter the workforce sooner.

For those interested in boosting their resume without a long-term commitment, there are many certifications for jobs that pay well. Certifications in areas such as public administration, data analysis, or project management can open doors to diverse roles in government, nonprofits, and private organizations.

No matter your goals, affordability is important. It’s worth exploring the cheapest online school options, which can help you minimize education costs while still receiving a quality education. Consider combining your Political Science studies with related online degrees or certifications to broaden your career options and stand out in the job market.

Best Scientists Citing Hans-Dieter Klingemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles