World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
4357
World Ranking
11348
National Ranking
1100

Robin C. Jackson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin C. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robin C. Jackson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin C. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robin C. Jackson is affiliated with Loughborough University in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the fields of Psychology and Medicine. Their work covers numerous subfields including Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The research topics most frequently addressed by Jackson include Sport Psychology and Performance, Sports Performance and Training, Sports Injuries and Prevention, Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews, Sports Analytics and Performance, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, and Behavioral Health and Interventions.

Jackson has published extensively in several academic venues, with the highest number of papers appearing in the Journal of Sports Sciences. Other frequent publication venues include Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Human Movement Science, BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly.

Their recent papers highlight the range of their research interests and contributions:

  • Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research, 2020, Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Classifying the evidence for evidence-based classification in Paralympic sport, 2021, Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Knowledge is power? Outcome probability information impairs detection of deceptive intent, 2020, Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Hill on a mountaintop: A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of the relative age effect in competitive youth football, 2020, Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Differences in the attitudes to sport psychology consulting between individual and team sport athletes, 2021, BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation

Throughout their career, Jackson has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Colin Boreham, Gareth W. Davison, Grant Abt, Eric S. Wallace, and Mark Williams. These collaborations have contributed to the depth of research particularly in sport science and psychology.

Best Publications

  • Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement.

    Robin C. Jackson;Simon Warren;Bruce Abernethy

  • Attentional Focus, Dispositional Reinvestment, and Skilled Motor Performance under Pressure

    Robin C. Jackson;Kelly J. Ashford;Glen Norsworthy

  • Probing expert anticipation with the temporal occlusion paradigm: experimental investigations of some methodological issues.

    Damian Farrow;Bruce Abernethy;Robin C. Jackson

  • Advance visual information, awareness, and anticipation skill.

    Robin C. Jackson;Peter Mogan

  • Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research

    Grant Abt;Colin Boreham;Gareth Davison;Robin Jackson

  • Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints

    Bruce Abernethy;Khairi Zawi;Khairi Zawi;Robin C Jackson;Robin C Jackson

  • Perceptual training methods compared: the relative efficacy of different approaches to enhancing sport-specific anticipation.

    Bruce Abernethy;Jörg Schorer;Robin C. Jackson;Norbert Hagemann

  • IMPLICIT PERCEPTUAL TRAINING :HOW, WHEN AND WHY?

    Robin C. Jackson;Damian Farrow

  • Functional MRI reveals expert-novice differences during sport-related anticipation

    Michael J. Wright;Daniel T. Bishop;Robin C. Jackson;Bruce Abernethy

  • Anticipation in sport: Fifty years on, what have we learned and what research still needs to be undertaken?

    A.M. Williams;R.C. Jackson

  • Routines, rituals and rugby: case study of a world class goal kicker

    Robin C. Jackson;Julien S. Baker

  • Neural bases for anticipation skill in soccer: an FMRI study.

    Daniel T. Bishop;Michael J. Wright;Robin C. Jackson;Bruce Abernethy

  • Cortical fMRI activation to opponents' body kinematics in sport-related anticipation: Expert-novice differences with normal and point-light video

    Michael J. Wright;Daniel T. Bishop;Robin C. Jackson;Robin C. Jackson;Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy

  • Attentional processes in skill learning and expert performance

    Bruce Abernethy;Jonathon P. Maxwell;Richard S. W. Masters;John Van Der Kamp

  • Reinvestment, task complexity and decision making under pressure in basketball

    Noel P. Kinrade;Robin C. Jackson;Kelly J. Ashford

  • Imperceptibly Off-Center Goalkeepers Influence Penalty-Kick Direction in Soccer

    R.S.W. Masters;J. van der Kamp;J. van der Kamp;R.C. Jackson

  • Brain regions concerned with the identification of deceptive soccer moves by higher-skilled and lower-skilled players

    Michael J. Wright;Daniel T. Bishop;Robin C. Jackson;Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy

  • Attention processes in skill learning and expert performance.

    B. Abernethy;J.P. Maxwell;R.S.W. Masters;J. van der Kamp

  • Dispositional reinvestment and skill failure in cognitive and motor tasks

    Noel P. Kinrade;Robin C. Jackson;Kelly J. Ashford

  • Brain regions concerned with perceptual skills in tennis: an fMRI study.

    Michael J. Wright;Robin C. Jackson

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce Abernethy
Bruce Abernethy University of Queensland
A. Mark Williams
A. Mark Williams University of Utah
Damian Farrow
Damian Farrow Victoria University
William R. Young
William R. Young University of California, San Diego
John van der Kamp
John van der Kamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David F. Fletcher
David F. Fletcher University of Sydney
Costas I. Karageorghis
Costas I. Karageorghis Brunel University London
John P. Wann
John P. Wann Royal Holloway University of London
Aidan Moran
Aidan Moran University College Dublin
Dianne C. Berry
Dianne C. Berry University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology can open doors to diverse online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students expand their knowledge by pairing psychology with related fields such as social work, counseling, or human services. Integrating both disciplines can strengthen your understanding of human behavior and community well-being.

For those interested in social work, numerous top-ranked online and campus-based programs are available across the U.S. For example, students in the Northwest should consider the best social work programs in Idaho, which offer a blend of practical and theoretical training. In the South, the best social work programs in Jackson and the best social work programs in Louisiana are known for preparing graduates to impact diverse communities.

If you’re drawn to urban environments with strong professional networks, consider the best social work degrees in Memphis. Pursuing education in these regions can enhance your career opportunities while giving you hands-on experience that’s highly valued by employers.

Best Scientists Citing Robin C. Jackson

Trending Scientists