World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
10082
World Ranking
6367
National Ranking
642

Dianne C. Berry publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne C. Berry sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dianne C. Berry D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne C. Berry sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dianne C. Berry is affiliated with the University of Reading in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile is marked by involvement in research across various fields, although detailed records of publications, co-authors, and specific research topics are not available.

The scientist's contributions to scholarly work have not been identified in recent papers or major publication venues. Similarly, no documented book publications or extensive collaborations with frequent co-authors are recorded, which limits the breadth of visible academic influence through joint research efforts.

Their research interests span several main fields and subfields of study, although specific areas of specialization or topics within these fields have not been cataloged. No particular focus on thematic topics or trends in their work can be outlined without further data.

There is no publicly recorded information about awards or honors granted to Dianne C. Berry. The current status indicates they are living.

Best Publications

  • On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge

    Dianne C. Berry;Donald E. Broadbent

  • Implicit Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Issues

    Dianne C. Berry;Zoltán Dienes

  • Interactive tasks and the implicit‐explicit distinction

    Dianne C. Berry;Donald E. Broadbent

  • Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold

    Z. Dienes;Dianne Claire Berry

  • Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.

    Zoltan Dienes;Donald Broadbent;Dianne C. Berry

  • Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements

    S P Banbury;D C Berry

  • Disruption of office‐related tasks by speech and office noise

    Simon Banbury;Dianne C. Berry

  • How implicit is implicit learning

    Dianne Claire Berry

  • The combination of explicit and implicit learning processes in task control

    Dianne C. Berry;Donald E. Broadbent

  • Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines

    P Knapp;D K Raynor;D C Berry

  • Provision of information about drug side-effects to patients

    DC Berry;P Knapp;DK Raynor

  • Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise

    S. Banbury;Dianne Claire Berry

  • Differences in perceived risks and benefits of herbal, over-the-counter conventional, and prescribed conventional, medicines, and the implications of this for the safe and effective use of herbal products.

    Natalie Lynch;Dianne Berry

  • Evaluating a realistic agent in an advice-giving task

    Dianne C. Berry;Laurie T. Butler;Fiorella de Rosis

  • Implicit memory: intention and awareness revisited

    Laurie T. Butler;Dianne C. Berry

  • What do patients want to know about their medicines, and what do doctors want to tell them?: A comparative study

    Dianne C. Berry;Irene C. Michas;Tony Gillie;Melanie Forster

  • Implicit Memory and Consumer Choice: The Mediating Role of Brand Familiarity

    Sarah L. Coates;Laurie T. Butler;Dianne C. Berry

  • Learning a procedural task: effectiveness of multimedia presentations

    Irene C Michas;Dianne C Berry

  • The problem of implicit knowledge

    Dianne C. Berry

  • Explanation and verbalization in a computer-assisted search task

    Dianne C. Berry;Donald E. Broadbent

  • Metacognitive experience and transfer of logical reasoning

    Dianne C. Berry

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald E. Broadbent
Donald E. Broadbent University of Oxford
Laurie T. Butler
Laurie T. Butler Anglia Ruskin University
Zoltan Dienes
Zoltan Dienes University of Sussex
Joachim Funke
Joachim Funke Heidelberg University
Lucy A. Henry
Lucy A. Henry City, University of London
Robin C. Jackson
Robin C. Jackson Loughborough University
John P. Wann
John P. Wann Royal Holloway University of London
Axel Buchner
Axel Buchner Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Dylan Marc Jones
Dylan Marc Jones Cardiff University
Melanie C. Steffens
Melanie C. Steffens Technical University of Kaiserslautern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to several rewarding online degree options and career pathways. Many students interested in human behavior also consider entering social work, counseling, or therapy roles. Social work is especially popular, and requirements can vary significantly across different states in the USA.

For instance, if you are interested in understanding how to become a social worker in Ohio, it’s important to know the state-specific licensing and education prerequisites. Similarly, the process of becoming a social worker in Oklahoma involves a clear path through accredited degree programs and practical experience.

In other states like Oregon, meeting the Oregon social work education requirements is necessary before applying for licensure. Likewise, graduates aiming for Pennsylvania must review the Pennsylvania social work license requirements to ensure they are on the right track.

Exploring these pathways through flexible online programs can make it easier to gain the right qualifications from anywhere in the USA, helping you start your career in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Dianne C. Berry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles