World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
23623
World Ranking
2557
National Ranking
283

Zoltan Dienes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoltan Dienes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Zoltan Dienes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoltan Dienes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Zoltan Dienes is affiliated with the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans neuroscience, with specific focus areas in cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, psychiatry, and mental health. Additionally, their work touches on statistics, probability, and uncertainty.

The scientist's research covers key topics which include:

  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Zoltan Dienes has contributed to various peer-reviewed publications. Among recent papers are:

  • "Trait phenomenological control predicts experience of mirror synaesthesia and the rubber hand illusion," 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • "A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research," 2022, Psychological Methods
  • "Discussion points for Bayesian inference," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Raising awareness about measurement error in research on unconscious mental processes," 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Phenomenological control as cold control," 2020, Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Peter Lush
  • Anil K. Seth
  • Bence Pálfi
  • R. B. Y. Scott
  • Benjamin A. Parris

Publishing activity is recurrent in several academic venues, most notably:

  • Peer Community In Registered Reports
  • Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Psychological Methods
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Best Publications

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results

    Zoltan Dienes

  • A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge

    Zoltan Dienes;Josef Perner

  • Bayesian versus Orthodox statistics: which side are you on?

    Zoltan Dienes

  • Implicit Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Issues

    Dianne C. Berry;Zoltán Dienes

  • Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold

    Z. Dienes;Dianne Claire Berry

  • Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches

    Anil K. Seth;Zoltán Dienes;Axel Cleeremans;Morten Overgaard

  • Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference

    Zoltan P. Dienes

  • Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.

    Zoltan Dienes;Donald Broadbent;Dianne C. Berry

  • Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically.

    Zoltán Dienes;Gerry T.M. Altmann;Liam Kwan;Alastair Goode

  • Measuring unconscious knowledge: distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge

    Zoltán Dienes;Ryan Scott

  • How Bayes factors change scientific practice

    Zoltan Dienes

  • Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing

    Zoltan Dienes;Neil Marvin McLatchie

  • Building Up Mathematics

    Zoltan Paul Dienes

  • Improving Inferences about Null Effects with Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests

    Daniël Lakens;Neil Marvin McLatchie;Peder M. Isager;Anne M. Scheel

  • On the modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge

    Gerry T M Altmann;Zoltán Dienes;Alastair Goode

  • Connectionist and memory-array models of artificial grammar learning

    Zoltan Dienes

  • Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge.

    Zoltán Dienes

  • Gambling on the unconscious: a comparison of wagering and confidence ratings as measures of awareness in an artificial grammar task

    Zoltán Dienes;Anil Seth

  • Registered Reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing

    Christopher D. Chambers;Zoltan Dienes;Robert D. McIntosh;Pia Rotshtein

  • Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains? How implicit and how abstract?

    Zoltán Dienes;Gerry Altmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Anil K. Seth
Anil K. Seth University of Sussex
Josef Perner
Josef Perner University of Salzburg
Xiaolan Fu
Xiaolan Fu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Gerry T. M. Altmann
Gerry T. M. Altmann University of Connecticut
Axel Cleeremans
Axel Cleeremans Université Libre de Bruxelles
Dianne C. Berry
Dianne C. Berry University of Reading
Jeffrey N. Rouder
Jeffrey N. Rouder University of California, Irvine
Gustav Kuhn
Gustav Kuhn Plymouth University
Timothy L. Hodgson
Timothy L. Hodgson University of Lincoln
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling opens up flexible options for students who wish to balance education with other commitments. Choosing an accredited online program can provide the same quality as traditional courses, with added convenience for working adults and remote learners.

Cost is a significant consideration for many prospective students. If you’re focused on affordability, you may want to look into the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in New York City or find opportunities by reviewing the cheapest online counseling master's programs in New York. Students outside New York aren’t left behind—there are also affordable online counseling master's degrees in Pennsylvania and affordable online counseling master's programs in Philadelphia.

With a psychology or counseling degree, graduates can pursue various career pathways including licensed mental health counselor, school counselor, or clinical psychologist. Online programs provide the flexibility needed to complete internships or meet practicum requirements locally, making them a practical entry point into this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Zoltan Dienes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles