World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Morten Overgaard

Morten Overgaard

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8900 8311 26 26 151 5795

Morten Overgaard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Morten Overgaard between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Morten Overgaard published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2014. 14 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2014. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications
2001 2025

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Morten Overgaard: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 4
2004 5
2005 3
2006 5
2007 2
2008 9
2009 8
2010 12
2011 10
2012 8
2013 6
2014 15
2015 11
2016 5
2017 14
2018 10
2019 9
2020 8
2021 12
2022 9
2023 12
2024 4
2025 10
Total 192
Download as CSV

Morten Overgaard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morten Overgaard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Morten Overgaard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morten Overgaard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Morten Overgaard is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their primary academic focus lies in the field of neuroscience, with substantial contributions spanning cognitive neuroscience and related subfields. Their research encompasses areas such as neural dynamics and brain function, visual perception and processing mechanisms, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, as well as embodied and extended cognition.

Overgaard's work is frequently published in journals like Consciousness and Cognition, Frontiers in Psychology, and Neuroscience of Consciousness. They have authored multiple papers, including:

  • "Comparing theories of consciousness: why it matters and how to do it" (2021), Neuroscience of Consciousness
  • "The Perceptual Awareness Scale-recent controversies and debates" (2021), Neuroscience of Consciousness
  • "Can neurofeedback provide evidence of direct brain-behavior causality?" (2022), NeuroImage
  • "Perceptual Representations and the Vividness of Stimulus-Triggered and Stimulus-Independent Experiences" (2020), Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Worlds apart? Testing the cultural distance hypothesis in music perception of Chinese and Western listeners" (2023), Cognition

Their frequent coauthors include Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup, Kristian Sandberg, Timo L. Kvamme, Simon Hviid Del Pin, and Zuzanna Skóra.

Overgaard's research extensively covers topics such as:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Embodied and extended cognition
  • Action observation and synchronization
  • Functional brain connectivity studies

The scientist's work appears in several publication venues, with highest contributions in:

  • Consciousness and Cognition
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Neuroscience of Consciousness
  • Philosophy and the Mind Sciences
  • Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice

Overgaard's ongoing research emphasizes cognitive neuroscience methodologies and experimental approaches to consciousness studies and perception. Their involvement in multidisciplinary collaborations has contributed to advancing knowledge on the neural correlates of conscious experience and perceptual awareness measurement.

Best Publications

  • Introspection and subliminal perception

    Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy;Morten Overgaard

  • Measuring consciousness: is one measure better than the other?

    Kristian Sandberg;Bert Timmermans;Morten Overgaard;Axel Cleeremans

  • Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches

    Anil K. Seth;Zoltán Dienes;Axel Cleeremans;Morten Overgaard

  • Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? A comparison of report methodologies during a visual task.

    Morten Overgaard;Julian Rote;Kim Mouridsen;Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy

  • Seeing without Seeing? Degraded Conscious Vision in a Blindsight Patient

    Morten Overgaard;Katrin Fehl;Katrin Fehl;Kim Mouridsen;Bo Bergholt

  • Kinds of access: different methods for report reveal different kinds of metacognitive access.

    Morten Overgaard;Kristian Sandberg

  • How can we measure awareness? An overview of current methods

    Bert Timmermans;Axel Cleeremans

  • Association of Psychiatric and Neurologic Comorbidity With Mortality Among Persons With Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Danish Population.

    Diana E. Schendel;Diana E. Schendel;Morten Overgaard;Jakob Christensen;Lene Hjort;Lene Hjort

  • The earliest electrophysiological correlate of visual awareness

    Mika Koivisto;Mikko Lähteenmäki;Thomas Alrik Sørensen;Signe Vangkilde

  • Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation Demonstrates a Causal Role of Premotor Homunculus in Action Understanding

    John Michael;Kristian Sandberg;Kristian Sandberg;Joshua Skewes;Thomas Wolf

  • Measuring consciousness: Task accuracy and awareness as sigmoid functions of stimulus duration

    Kristian Sandberg;Bo Martin Bibby;Bert Timmermans;Axel Cleeremans

  • Occipital MEG Activity in the Early Time Range (<300 ms) Predicts Graded Changes in Perceptual Consciousness

    Lau Møller Andersen;Michael Nygaard Pedersen;Kristian Sandberg;Kristian Sandberg;Morten Overgaard;Morten Overgaard

  • Introspection in science.

    Morten Overgaard

  • Visual experience and blindsight: a methodological review

    Morten Overgaard;Morten Overgaard

  • Can No-Report Paradigms Extract True Correlates of Consciousness?

    Morten Overgaard;Peter Fazekas

  • Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness.

    Morten Overgaard;Bert Timmermans;Kristian Sandberg;Axel Cleeremans

  • Dopaminergic stimulation enhances confidence and accuracy in seeing rapidly presented words.

    Hans Olav Christensen Lou;Joshua Charles Skewes;Kristine Rømer Thomsen;Morten Overgaard;Morten Overgaard

  • Behavioral Methods in Consciousness Research

    Morten Overgaard

  • On the naturalising of phenomenology

    Morten Overgaard

  • Using the Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS)

    Kristian Sandberg;Morten Overgaard

  • Neural correlates of contents and levels of consciousness

    Morten Overgaard;Rikke Overgaard

Frequent Co-Authors

Axel Cleeremans
Axel Cleeremans Université Libre de Bruxelles
Geraint Rees
Geraint Rees University College London
Bahador Bahrami
Bahador Bahrami Max Planck Society
Gareth R. Barnes
Gareth R. Barnes University College London
Niko A. Busch
Niko A. Busch University of Münster
Per Kragh Andersen
Per Kragh Andersen University of Copenhagen
Ryota Kanai
Ryota Kanai University of Sussex
Valerie Voon
Valerie Voon University of Cambridge
Antti Revonsuo
Antti Revonsuo University of Turku
Shaun Gallagher
Shaun Gallagher University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online can open numerous doors, from foundational undergraduate programs to advanced graduate studies. Many institutions across the United States offer flexible online options designed for busy students or working professionals. Depending on your career goals, you can choose to specialize in counseling, clinical psychology, research, or even organizational psychology.

Regional choices can also play a significant role in your educational journey. For instance, the popular psychology degrees in Nashville offer unique local opportunities, while the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Oklahoma are recognized for their robust curriculum.

Students may also consider the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Orlando, which are known for strong student support and internship connections. Similarly, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno let students access specialized fields and local expertise.

Each of these locations provides distinct advantages, helping students build a strong foundation for careers in mental health, education, community services, or research—all while benefiting from the flexibility of online learning options.

Best Scientists Citing Morten Overgaard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles