World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
6344
World Ranking
8314
National Ranking
247

Gloria Roberts publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gloria Roberts sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 105 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gloria Roberts D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gloria Roberts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gloria Roberts is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health. Within this domain, Roberts has contributed extensively to topics related to Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare.

Their main fields of study include Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Speech and Hearing. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach combining genetic, neuroimaging, and psychiatric methodologies.

Roberts' recent publications demonstrate sustained engagement with large-scale neuroimaging and genetic investigations. Notable papers include:

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Genetic Variants Associated with Longitudinal Changes in Brain Structure Across the Lifespan, 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • What We Learn About Bipolar Disorder from Large-Scale Neuroimaging: Findings and Future Directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Longitudinal Structural Brain Changes in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Neuroimaging Study of 1232 Individuals by the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • In Vivo Hippocampal Subfield Volumes in Bipolar Disorder-A Mega-Analysis from The Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Roberts are Philip B. Mitchell, Janice M. Fullerton, Bronwyn J. Overs, Dominik Grotegerd, and Tilo Kircher. This network suggests ongoing cooperative research in neuropsychiatry and neurogenetics.

Scientific findings have been disseminated across various peer-reviewed venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Their research addresses multiple topics, highlighting complexity and intersectionality in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Key topics covered in their work are:

  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder : An MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    D P Hibar;L T Westlye;L T Westlye;N T Doan;N T Doan;N Jahanshad

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Metastable brain waves.

    James A. Roberts;Leonardo L. Gollo;Romesh G. Abeysuriya;Gloria Roberts

  • The contribution of geometry to the human connectome.

    James A. Roberts;Alistair Perry;Anton R. Lord;Gloria M. P. Roberts

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Widespread white matter microstructural abnormalities in bipolar disorder: evidence from mega- and meta-analyses across 3033 individuals

    Pauline Favre;Pauline Favre;Melissa Pauling;Melissa Pauling;Jacques Stout;Franz Hozer

  • Consistency-based thresholding of the human connectome.

    James A. Roberts;Alistair Perry;Gloria M. P. Roberts;Philip B. Mitchell;Philip B. Mitchell

  • Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group

    Abraham Nunes;Hugo G. Schnack;Christopher R.K. Ching;Christopher R.K. Ching;Ingrid Agartz

  • Functional Dysconnection of the Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Young People With Bipolar Disorder or at Genetic High Risk

    Gloria Roberts;Anton Lord;Andrew Frankland;Andrew Frankland;Adam Wright

  • Connectomics of bipolar disorder: a critical review, and evidence for dynamic instabilities within interoceptive networks

    Alistair Perry;Gloria Roberts;Philip B. Mitchell;Philip B. Mitchell;Michael Breakspear

  • What we learn about bipolar disorder from large‐scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA bipolar disorder working group

    Christopher R K Ching;Derrek P Hibar;Tiril P Gurholt;Tiril P Gurholt;Abraham Nunes

  • Deficits in learning and memory: Parahippocampal hyperactivity and frontocortical hypoactivity in cannabis users

    Liam Nestor;Gloria M. P. Roberts;Hugh Garavan;Robert Hester

  • Comparison of depressive episodes in bipolar disorder and in major depressive disorder within bipolar disorder pedigrees

    Philip B. Mitchell;Andrew Frankland;Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic;Gloria Roberts

  • Reduced Inferior Frontal Gyrus Activation During Response Inhibition to Emotional Stimuli in Youth at High Risk of Bipolar Disorder

    Gloria Roberts;Gloria Roberts;Melissa J. Green;Michael Breakspear;Clare McCormack;Clare McCormack

  • The Association Between Familial Risk and Brain Abnormalities Is Disease Specific: An ENIGMA-Relatives Study of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Sonja M.C. de Zwarte;Rachel M. Brouwer;Ingrid Agartz;Ingrid Agartz;Martin Alda;Martin Alda

  • Evidence of increased activation underlying cognitive control in ecstasy and cannabis users.

    Gloria M.P. Roberts;Hugh Garavan

  • Fronto-limbic dysconnectivity leads to impaired brain network controllability in young people with bipolar disorder and those at high genetic risk

    Jayson Jeganathan;Alistair Perry;Danielle S. Bassett;Gloria Roberts

  • Longitudinal Structural Brain Changes in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Neuroimaging Study of 1232 Individuals by the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    Christoph Abé;Christopher R K Ching;Benny Liberg;Alexander V Lebedev

  • The organisation of the elderly connectome

    Alistair Perry;Wei Wen;Anton R. Lord;Anbupalam Thalamuthu

  • Prevalence of psychopathology in bipolar high-risk offspring and siblings: a meta-analysis

    Phoebe Lau;David J. Hawes;Caroline Hunt;Andrew Frankland

  • Bipolar disorder in a national survey using the World Mental Health Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview: the impact of differing diagnostic algorithms.

    P. B. Mitchell;Amy K. Johnston;A. Frankland;A. Frankland;T. Slade

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip B. Mitchell
Philip B. Mitchell University of New South Wales
Janice M. Fullerton
Janice M. Fullerton University of New South Wales
Rhoshel K. Lenroot
Rhoshel K. Lenroot University of New South Wales
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Michael Breakspear
Michael Breakspear University of Newcastle Australia
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic University of New South Wales
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Ole A. Andreassen
Ole A. Andreassen Oslo University Hospital
Melissa J. Green
Melissa J. Green University of New South Wales
Florence Levy
Florence Levy University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience can open the door to various interdisciplinary career pathways, especially in mental health and counseling. Many students consider complementing their neuroscience knowledge with advanced degrees in related fields such as counseling, psychology, and therapy.

Those aiming to become licensed counselors may look into cacrep-accredited online counseling programs that ensure rigorous professional training and industry recognition. Prospective students seeking value may also explore options for an affordable master's in counseling online, which can prepare graduates for clinical or school counseling careers.

For those interested in working with families and couples, online mft programs accredited by relevant counseling boards offer specialized training in marriage and family therapy. Additionally, students may pursue an affordable online masters in clinical psychology to build expertise in psychological assessment, intervention, and research.

Each of these online degree options can serve as a strong foundation for diverse roles in healthcare, education, and private practice, allowing neuroscience graduates to expand their career impact.

Best Scientists Citing Gloria Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles