World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9588 8969 948 907 158 4751
Neuroscience 36 9044 8357 665 617 163 4767

Devin Blair Terhune publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Devin Blair Terhune between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Devin Blair Terhune published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2022. 33 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2022. 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 15 publications
2006 2025

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Devin Blair Terhune: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 3
2007 3
2008 3
2009 8
2010 5
2011 7
2012 8
2013 9
2014 7
2015 5
2016 8
2017 6
2018 5
2019 9
2020 9
2021 19
2022 24
2023 21
2024 18
2025 15
Total 192
Download as CSV

Devin Blair Terhune publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Devin Blair Terhune sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397 163
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Devin Blair Terhune D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Devin Blair Terhune sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Devin Blair Terhune is affiliated with Goldsmiths University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans several fields including Neuroscience, Psychology, and Medicine, with notable publication counts in each. The main subfields explored in Terhune's work include Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their scholarly output frequently addresses topics such as Pain Management and Placebo Effect, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Neuroscience and Music Perception, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Mind Wandering and Attention, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, and intersecting themes of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes.

Devin Blair Terhune has published extensively in various academic venues. Most notably, they have contributed 12 papers to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 5 papers to the International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 3 papers to PLoS ONE, 2 papers to the Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, and 2 papers to Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • Towards a neurocognitive approach to dance movement therapy for mental health: A systematic review (2020), Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • Suggestibility in functional neurological disorder: a meta-analysis (2020), Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Myths and misconceptions about hypnosis and suggestion: Separating fact and fiction (2020), Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • A Critical Review of Standardized Measures of Hypnotic Suggestibility (2021), International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
  • Current Practices, Experiences, and Views in Clinical Hypnosis: Findings of an International Survey (2023), International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Terhune frequently collaborates with a set of co-authors, including Renata Sadibolova, Lillian Wieder, L. S. Merritt Millman, Madeline V. Stein, and Elaine Hunter. These collaborations indicate an active engagement in interdisciplinary research networks.

Best Publications

  • Yoga Asana sessions increase brain GABA levels: a pilot study

    Chris C. Streeter;J. Eric Jensen;Ruth M. Perlmutter;Howard J. Cabral

  • The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 controlled experimental trials.

    Trevor Thompson;Devin Blair Terhune;Charlotte Oram;Joseph Sharangparni

  • Performance on the Stroop predicts treatment compliance in cocaine-dependent individuals.

    Chris C Streeter;Chris C Streeter;Chris C Streeter;Devin Blair Terhune;Theodore H Whitfield;Staci Gruber

  • Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness

    Devin B. Terhune;Axel Cleeremans;Amir Raz;Steven Jay Lynn

  • The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis.

    Etzel Cardeña;Peter Jönsson;Devin B. Terhune;David Marcusson-Clavertz

  • The effects of microdose LSD on time perception: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Steliana Yanakieva;Naya Polychroni;Neiloufar Family;Luke T. J. Williams

  • New directions in hypnosis research: strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis

    Mark P Jensen;Graham A Jamieson;Antoine Lutz;Giuliana Mazzoni

  • Dissociative tendencies and individual differences in high hypnotic suggestibility

    Devin Blair Terhune;Etzel Cardeña;Magnus Lindgren

  • Enhanced cortical excitability in grapheme-color synesthesia and its modulation.

    Devin Blair Terhune;Sarah Tai;Alan Cowey;Tudor Popescu

  • Possession/trance phenomena

    Etzel Cardeña;Marjolein van Duijl;Lupita A. Weiner;Devin B. Terhune

  • Differential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis

    Devin Blair Terhune;Etzel Cardeña

  • The induction of synaesthesia with chemical agents: a systematic review

    David P. Luke;Devin Blair Terhune

  • Differential frontal-parietal phase synchrony during hypnosis as a function of hypnotic suggestibility.

    Devin Blair Terhune;Devin Blair Terhune;Etzel Cardeña;Magnus Lindgren

  • Transcranial random noise stimulation mitigates increased difficulty in an arithmetic learning task

    Tudor Popescu;Beatrix Krause;Devin Blair Terhune;Olivia Twose

  • The incidence and determinants of visual phenomenology during out-of-body experiences.

    Devin Blair Terhune

  • Towards a neurocognitive approach to dance movement therapy for mental health: A systematic review.

    L S Merritt Millman;Devin Blair Terhune;Elaine C M Hunter;Guido Orgs

  • Dissociated control as a signature of typological variability in high hypnotic suggestibility

    Devin Blair Terhune;Etzel Cardeña;Magnus Lindgren

  • Subjective Duration as a Signature of Coding Efficiency : Emerging Links Among Stimulus Repetition, Predictive Coding, and Cortical GABA Levels

    William J. Matthews;Devin B. Terhune;Hedderik van Rijn;David M. Eagleman

  • Hypnotic experience is related to emotional contagion.

    Etzel Cardeña;Devin Blair Terhune;Angelica Lööf;Sandra Buratti

  • Disruption of synaesthesia by posthypnotic suggestion: An ERP study

    Devin Blair Terhune;Etzel Cardeña;Magnus Lindgren

  • Phosphene Perception Relates to Visual Cortex Glutamate Levels and Covaries with Atypical Visuospatial Awareness.

    Devin Blair Terhune;Elizabeth Murray;Jamie Near;Charlotte J. Stagg

  • Daydreaming style moderates the relation between working memory and mind-wandering: Integrating two hypotheses.

    David Marcusson-Clavertz;Etzel Cardeña;Devin Blair Terhune

  • Hypnosis and imagination

    Devin Blair Terhune;D. A. Oakley

Frequent Co-Authors

Etzel Cardeña
Etzel Cardeña Lund University
Roi Cohen Kadosh
Roi Cohen Kadosh University of Surrey
Magnus Lindgren
Magnus Lindgren Lund University
Perry F. Renshaw
Perry F. Renshaw University of Utah
Warren H. Meck
Warren H. Meck Duke University
Richard J. Brown
Richard J. Brown University of Manchester
Alan Cowey
Alan Cowey University of Oxford
Steven Jay Lynn
Steven Jay Lynn Binghamton University
Erik Z. Woody
Erik Z. Woody University of Waterloo
Amanda J. Barnier
Amanda J. Barnier Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens up a wide range of rewarding career paths, especially in counseling and mental health services. With growing demand for mental health professionals, many students are considering programs that offer the best educational value and strong job prospects.

When choosing a program, it’s important to consider both cost and career outcomes. Resources such as the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Florida and the best value counseling programs in Los Angeles can help you identify top options in major regions.

Prospective students should also look into the best value counseling programs in Missouri and the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania for more guidance on choosing an affordable path with strong job placement rates.

With many accredited online options, you can customize your education to fit your interests and location—opening doors to roles in clinical counseling, research, school psychology, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Devin Blair Terhune

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles